Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

ABM Janitorial Services

140 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 140 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 09, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 27, 29, 31, 32 · Arlington, VA; Bloomington, MN; Brownsville, TN; Burlington, NJ; CINCINNATI, OH; Chicago Heights, IL and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	131
RC	Petition for an election	5
RD	Petition to decertify	4

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 September 2024Case 06-CA-350959ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2024Case 06-CA-350157ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2024Case 06-CA-350135ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 July 2023Case 20-CA-322470ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 8,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 May 2023Case 20-CA-318348ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 15
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 16 December 2020Case 18-CA-270318ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 10
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 26 February 2020Case 18-CA-256992ClosedGolden Valley, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 May 2019Case 14-CA-242460ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2019Case 02-CA-236338ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 January 2019Case 02-CA-234846ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 January 2019Case 02-CA-234797ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 January 2019Case 31-CA-234354ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 November 2018Case 13-CA-231499ClosedGary, INRegion 13Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2018Case 15-CA-226605ClosedBrownsville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 October 2017Case 22-CA-207325ClosedParamus, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 July 2017Case 02-CA-202231ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 June 2017Case 32-CA-200599ClosedSunnyvale, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 8
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2017Case 02-CA-200144ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2017Case 02-CA-199294ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2017Case 02-CA-192795ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 January 2017Case 13-CA-190821ClosedLincolnwood, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2016Case 02-CA-187317ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 May 2016Case 21-CA-177297ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2016Case 21-CA-176764ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 14
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2015Case 05-CA-164156ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 October 2015Case 05-CA-162404ClosedArlington, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 September 2015Case 01-CA-160261ClosedEast Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 August 2015Case 01-CA-157516ClosedEast Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 June 2015Case 07-CA-153761ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50,000
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 23 April 2015Case 29-CA-150961ClosedHauppauge, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 40
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 9 March 2015Case 18-CA-147746ClosedMINNEAPOLIS, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 23 February 2015Case 29-RC-146871ClosedHicksville, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 11
Included: All full-time and regular part-time employees employed by the company at 150 Motor Parkway Hauppaugue, NY Excluded: Supervisors and guards as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2015Case 02-CA-146413ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 January 2015Case 07-CA-145500ClosedTroy, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 12 December 2014Case 09-CA-142792ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 December 2014Case 07-CA-142604ClosedTroy, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 22
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 2 October 2014Case 15-CA-137988ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 11
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2014Case 06-CA-134719ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 160
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 24 June 2014Case 18-CA-131392ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 7
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 June 2014Case 32-CA-130890ClosedSan Jose, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 April 2014Case 07-CA-127711ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 April 2014Case 13-CA-127422ClosedChicago Heights, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2014Case 07-CA-123630ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 February 2014Case 27-CA-122242ClosedEnglewood, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 23 December 2013Case 18-CA-119470ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2013Case 06-CA-115966ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2013Case 31-CA-115863ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2013Case 27-CA-114978ClosedEnglewood, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2013Case 27-CA-114974ClosedWestminster, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 50
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 21 August 2013Case 01-CA-111688ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 July 2013Case 07-CA-109858ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 20 June 2013Case 18-CA-107626ClosedBloomington, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 20
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 11 June 2013Case 18-CA-106950ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 20
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 3 June 2013Case 18-CA-106350ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 3 June 2013Case 18-CA-106347ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 26 March 2013Case 02-CA-101255ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 February 2013Case 16-CA-098544ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2013Case 20-CA-097815ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 24 January 2013Case 18-CA-097006ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 November 2012Case 32-CA-092900ClosedPLEASANTON, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 26 October 2012Case 29-RD-092105ClosedJamaica, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 122
Included: all full-time and regular part-time building, cargo and ramp cleaning employees at the Delta Airlines terminal at John F. Kennedy International Airport, including lead personnel, employed by ABM Janitorial Services . Excluded: All other employees, confidential employees, office clerical employees, guards, watchmen and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2012Case 21-CA-092163ClosedLOS ANGELES, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 3 October 2012Case 29-RD-090513ClosedJamaica, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 122
Included: All full-time and regular part-time building, cargo and ramp cleaning employees at the Delta Airlines Terminal at John F. Kennedy International Airport, including lead personnel, employed by ABM Janitorial Services Northeast, Inc. Excluded: all other employees, confidential employees, office clerical employees, guards, watchmen and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 28 September 2012Case 07-RC-090221ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 10
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 24 September 2012Case 32-CA-089945ClosedSan Jose, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 September 2012Case 13-CA-089919ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2012Case 01-CA-088871ClosedSomerville, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,186
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 July 2012Case 16-CA-085100ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2012Case 16-CA-084436ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 June 2012Case 20-CA-083000ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 May 2012Case 16-CA-082213ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 April 2012Case 16-CA-079647ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10
ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES
CA
Filed 30 March 2012Case 02-CA-077865ClosedNEW YORK, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 January 2012Case 22-CA-073079ClosedEast Hanover, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 December 2011Case 29-CA-070498ClosedHicksville, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2011Case 02-CA-068414ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2011Case 02-CA-066291ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 October 2011Case 13-CA-066021ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 1
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 29 March 2011Case 29-RC-012023ClosedFlushing, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 45
Included: All regular full-time and regular part-time employees including cleaners, maintenance, hostess employees by the employer at La Guardia Airport. Excluded: All other employees defined by the Act.
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 3 March 2011Case 29-RD-001155ClosedFlushing, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 45
All full time and regular part-time cleaners and related employees, including but not limited to host/hostess and maintenance employees located at LaGuardia Airport, American Airlines All other employees, including clerical employees, managerial employees, confidential employees, professional employees, guards, watchmen, and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 January 2011Case 21-CA-039661ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 650
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2011Case 05-CA-036380ClosedFrederick, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 October 2010Case 21-CA-039551ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 August 2010Case 31-CA-029906ClosedSanta Monica, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 August 2010Case 31-CA-029898ClosedSanta Monica, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2010Case 02-CA-039998ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2010Case 21-CA-039388ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2010Case 07-CA-052961ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2010Case 20-CA-035036ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 2,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 15 April 2010Case 04-RC-021680ClosedBurlington, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 4
All full-time and part time janitors at the Burlington Center Mall, 2501 Burlington/Mt. Holly Road Burlington, NJ 08016
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 March 2010Case 21-CA-039271ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2010Case 18-CA-019303ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 February 2010Case 18-CA-019292ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2010Case 32-CA-024957ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 February 2010Case 18-CA-019281ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2010Case 31-CA-029569ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2010Case 18-CA-019265ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 2,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 23 December 2009Case 29-RC-011844ClosedHicksville, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 3
Included: all full time and part time janitorial employees, maintenance employees, cleaning employees, floor technicians and window cleaners employed by the employer at its Saks Fifth Avenue located at 455 Commack Road, suite 1250 Deer park NY 11729. Excluded: all others
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 December 2009Case 21-CA-039167ClosedIrvine, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 November 2009Case 13-CA-045619ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2009Case 20-CA-034630ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 7 August 2009Case 22-RD-001527ClosedNewark, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 300
Included: All janitors/cleaners Excluded: Supervisors, clericals and all other managements as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2008Case 13-CA-045019ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2008Case 20-CA-034180ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 September 2008Case 07-CA-051518ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 September 2008Case 06-CA-036217ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 August 2008Case 18-CA-018836ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 August 2008Case 21-CA-038443ClosedTustin, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 August 2008Case 21-CA-038441ClosedTustin, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2008Case 20-CA-033952ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2008Case 18-CA-018759ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 April 2008Case 18-CA-018749ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2008Case 32-CA-023829ClosedSan Jose, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 45
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 November 2007Case 20-CA-033723ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 November 2007Case 07-CA-050871ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2007Case 04-CA-035748ClosedKing of Prussia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 October 2007Case 01-CA-044240ClosedSouth Boston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2007Case 18-CA-018492ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2007Case 18-CA-018471ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 June 2007Case 20-CA-033478ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 June 2007Case 01-CA-044004ClosedSouth Boston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 June 2007Case 20-CA-033473ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 March 2007Case 20-CA-033361ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 February 2007Case 20-CA-033289ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2007Case 06-CA-035492ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 October 2006Case 31-CA-028040ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 27
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2006Case 06-CA-035373ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 October 2006Case 04-CA-034964ClosedKing of Prussia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2006Case 20-CA-033096ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 March 2006Case 20-CA-032937ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2006Case 32-CA-022427ClosedSan Ramon, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 December 2005Case 34-CA-011375ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 December 2005Case 20-CA-032824ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 November 2005Case 20-CA-032793ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 September 2005Case 20-CA-032689ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 June 2005Case 20-CA-032576ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2005Case 21-CA-036856ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 February 2005Case 20-CA-032366ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 January 2005Case 20-CA-032289ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 March 2003Case 06-CA-033327ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 80

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.