Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

ABM

198 cases in this site's copy of the record · 6 of those 198 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 09, 10, 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 27, 29, 31, 32 · Atlanta, GA; Boston, MA; Bridgewater, NJ; CINCINNATI, OH; Central Islip, NY; Century City, CA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	191
RC	Petition for an election	5
RM	Petition filed by an employer	1
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	1

The cases

Page 2 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2013Case 09-CA-099251ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2013Case 20-CA-097057ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2013Case 04-CA-096419ClosedPHILADELPHIA, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 December 2012Case 21-CA-094284ClosedLOS ANGELES, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2012Case 20-CA-092408ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 June 2012Case 27-CA-084060ClosedEnglewood, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2012Case 31-CA-083866ClosedCentury City, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2012Case 27-CA-083899ClosedEnglewood, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2012Case 25-CA-083169ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 October 2011Case 29-CA-067652ClosedCentral Islip, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 August 2011Case 09-CA-062457ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 December 2010Case 21-CA-039628ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 November 2010Case 32-CA-025496ClosedSan Ramon, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 November 2010Case 20-CA-035323ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2010Case 22-CA-029437ClosedNewark, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 March 2010Case 20-CA-034954ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2010Case 20-CA-034905ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2009Case 20-CA-034788ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2009Case 21-CA-039129ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 November 2009Case 07-CA-052529ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2009Case 32-CA-024657ClosedSan Ramon, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 March 2009Case 16-CA-026640ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2009Case 05-CA-034759ClosedFrederick, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 February 2009Case 20-CA-034321ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 October 2008Case 20-CA-034143ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 11 February 2008Case 22-RC-012884ClosedBridgewater, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 6
Included: All full time and regular part time Engineers, Maintenance and Boilers Operators employed by the Employer at the Wells Properties Excluded: All other employees by the employer including temporary employees, casual employees, office clericals, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2007Case 20-CA-033682ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 August 2007Case 09-CA-043755ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 August 2007Case 09-CA-043754ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2007Case 09-CA-043733ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2007Case 09-CA-043732ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2007Case 09-CA-043731ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2007Case 09-CA-043730ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2007Case 09-CA-043729ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2007Case 09-CA-043728ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2007Case 09-CA-043727ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2007Case 02-CA-038264ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2007Case 09-CA-043514ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2007Case 09-CA-043513ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 March 2007Case 20-CA-033345ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2006Case 20-CA-032971ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2006Case 20-CA-032946ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 March 2006Case 02-CA-037555ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 March 2006Case 20-CA-032917ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2006Case 20-CA-032890ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 October 2005Case 20-CA-032765ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2005Case 20-CA-032456ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2002Case 02-CA-034635ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000

Page 2 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.