Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

ACV Enviro

40 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 40 are marked open by the Board · Region 02, 04, 06, 22 · Aston, PA; Avenel, NJ; Clayton, NJ; ELIZABETH, NJ; Elizabeth, NJ; New Windsor, NY and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	39
RC	Petition for an election	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 December 2019Case 04-CA-252711ClosedAston, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 50
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 15 October 2019Case 06-RC-249880ClosedWilliamsport, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 11
Included: Mechanics, Lead Mechanics, Drivers, Field Techs, Field Tech Supervisor, Foremen, Driver Trainer, Welder Excluded: All other employees
ACV ENVIRO
CA
Filed 14 May 2019Case 22-CA-242543ClosedTOMS RIVER, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 115
ACV ENVIRO
CA
Filed 10 May 2019Case 22-CA-241163ClosedELIZABETH, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 20
ACV ENVIRO
CA
Filed 10 May 2019Case 22-CA-241147ClosedRAHWAY, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 April 2019Case 22-CA-240162ClosedElizabeth, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 April 2019Case 22-CA-240049ClosedRahway, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 April 2019Case 04-CA-239687ClosedAston, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2019Case 04-CA-238489ClosedClayton, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2019Case 02-CA-238585ClosedNew Windsor, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 March 2019Case 04-CA-237914ClosedAston, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 March 2019Case 04-CA-237726ClosedClayton, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2019Case 22-CA-237823ClosedRahway, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2019Case 22-CA-237738ClosedRahway, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2019Case 22-CA-237728ClosedElizabeth, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2019Case 22-CA-237721ClosedElizabeth, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2019Case 22-CA-237671ClosedElizabeth, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2019Case 22-CA-237669ClosedRahway, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2019Case 04-CA-237719ClosedClayton, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2019Case 04-CA-237687ClosedClayton, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2019Case 02-CA-237920ClosedNew Windsor, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2019Case 02-CA-237848ClosedNew Windsor, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2019Case 02-CA-237749ClosedNew Windsor, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 March 2019Case 22-CA-236975ClosedRahway, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 March 2019Case 22-CA-236972ClosedElizabeth, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 February 2019Case 22-CA-236098ClosedElizabeth, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 February 2019Case 04-CA-235424ClosedAvenel, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 January 2019Case 22-CA-234248ClosedElizabeth, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2019Case 22-CA-234157ClosedElizabeth, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2019Case 22-CA-233955ClosedRahway, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2019Case 04-CA-233876ClosedClayton, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2019Case 02-CA-234006ClosedNew Windsor, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2019Case 02-CA-233989ClosedNew Windsor, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 January 2019Case 04-CA-233765ClosedClayton, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 45
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 December 2018Case 22-CA-233403ClosedElizabeth, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 December 2018Case 04-CA-233343ClosedClayton, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 November 2018Case 22-CA-231476ClosedElizabeth, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 November 2018Case 22-CA-230963ClosedElizabeth, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 68
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 November 2018Case 02-CA-231151ClosedNew Windsor, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 November 2018Case 22-CA-230339ClosedElizabeth, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 70

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.