Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Akal Security

78 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 78 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 03, 04, 05, 08, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 25, 27, 28, 29 · Albuquerque, NM; Atlanta, GA; Baltimore, MD; Bel Air, MD; Boston, MA; Brooklyn, NY and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	67
RC	Petition for an election	3
RD	Petition to decertify	7
UD	Petition on union security	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 July 2019Case 13-CA-245429ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 May 2019Case 13-CA-240997ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 July 2017Case 04-CA-201742ClosedScranton, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 24
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 June 2017Case 04-CA-200844ClosedScranton, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 24
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2017Case 04-CA-194226ClosedScranton, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 24
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 August 2016Case 28-CA-182378ClosedMesa, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2015Case 12-CA-165240ClosedTOA ALTA, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 November 2015Case 12-CA-164881ClosedSan Juan, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 60
AKAL SECURITY
RD
Filed 4 June 2015Case 18-RD-153601ClosedSaint Paul, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 18
Minnesota Court Security Officers Association Local #158
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 17 April 2015Case 03-CA-150317ClosedEspanola, NMRegion 03Workers in the unit 50
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 10 February 2015Case 03-CA-146060ClosedEspanola, NMRegion 03Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 2015Case 28-CA-144331ClosedMesa, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 80
AKAL SECURITY
RC
Filed 29 July 2014Case 10-RC-133607ClosedMacon, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 43
All lead court security officers and court security officers employed in Albany, GA, Columbus, GA and Macon, GA, excluding supervisors.
AKAL SECURITY
RD
Filed 24 July 2014Case 10-RD-133364ClosedMacon, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 43
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 27 November 2013Case 10-RD-117930ClosedMacon, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 32
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 August 2013Case 14-CA-110598ClosedKansas City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 50
AKAL SECURITY
CA
Filed 27 December 2012Case 04-CA-095546ClosedESPANOLA, NMRegion 04Workers in the unit 70
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 June 2012Case 05-CA-083345ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 100
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 30 March 2012Case 24-CA-077818ClosedSan Juan, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 December 2011Case 12-CA-069953ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 144
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 7 October 2011Case 26-RC-066334ClosedLittle Rock, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 26
Included: All full-time and share time court security officers and lead court security officers employed by Akal Security, Inc. and performing guard services in Federal Court Buildings in the Easters District of Arkansas. Excluded: All office clerical employees, professional employees, and supervisors as defined in the Act.
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 28 June 2011Case 13-CA-060648ClosedEspanola, NMRegion 13Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2010Case 20-CA-035276ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 13
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2010Case 37-CA-008156ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 13
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 24 September 2010Case 01-CA-046393ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2010Case 37-CA-008042ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 100
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 3 March 2010Case 37-CA-007963ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2009Case 08-CA-038711ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 4,000
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 10 November 2009Case 28-CA-022778ClosedEspanola, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 239
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 October 2009Case 20-CA-034702ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 September 2009Case 10-CA-038054ClosedSanta Cruz, NMRegion 10Workers in the unit 1,000
AKAL SECURITY
CA
Filed 20 July 2009Case 25-CA-031074ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 25
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 15 April 2009Case 18-CA-019020ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 21
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 9 January 2009Case 37-CA-007693ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 20
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 9 January 2009Case 37-CA-007692ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 20
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 6 January 2009Case 37-CA-007689ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2008Case 05-CA-034571ClosedBel Air, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 September 2008Case 12-CA-025997ClosedSanta Cruz, NMRegion 12Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 September 2008Case 28-CA-022140ClosedEspanola, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 150
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 10 October 2007Case 08-CA-037455ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 3,000
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 28 August 2007Case 08-CA-037368ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 3,000
AKAL SECURITY
UD
Filed 21 August 2007Case 25-UD-000259ClosedFort Wayne, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 119
Included: SEE ATTACHMENT TO PETITION
AKAL Security
RD
Filed 25 July 2007Case 19-RD-003769ClosedCouer d'Alene, IDRegion 19Workers in the unit 5
Included: All full time and shared position, federal court security officers (CSO), federal special security officers (SSOS), lead federal security officers (LESOS), and lead federal special security officers employed by the company in the 9th Circuit. Excluded: All other employees, including office clericals and professional employees as defined in the Act.
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 12 July 2007Case 27-CA-020542ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 10
AKAL Security
RD
Filed 5 June 2007Case 37-RD-000418ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 31
Included: All full-time and regular part-time security officers employed by the Employer at all Federal buildings on the islands of Guam and Saipan and are providing guard duties as defined in Section 9(b)(3) of the Act, as amended. Excluded: All other employees, including executives, supervisors, professional employees, and clerical employees, as defined in the Act, as amended.
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 14 May 2007Case 13-RD-002564ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 100
Included: All security Officers in the Chicagoland area that are members of SPFPA local 200. Excluded: All managers and supervisors.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2007Case 08-CA-037176ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 March 2007Case 13-CA-043904ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 500
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 6 March 2007Case 10-CA-036722ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 9,050
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 27 December 2006Case 12-CA-025236ClosedDavie, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2006Case 13-CA-043614ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 440
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 September 2006Case 13-CA-043600ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 20
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 19 June 2006Case 27-CA-020093ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 19 June 2006Case 27-CA-020092ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 5 June 2006Case 14-CA-028653ClosedEast Saint Louis, ILRegion 14Workers in the unit 101
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 17 May 2006Case 29-CA-027673ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 May 2006Case 27-CA-020029ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 28 April 2006Case 13-CA-043354ClosedSanta Cruz, NMRegion 13Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2006Case 16-CA-024895ClosedMidlothian, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2006Case 19-CA-030253ClosedSanta Cruz, NMRegion 19Workers in the unit 48
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 23 March 2006Case 16-CA-024864ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 7
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 20 January 2006Case 14-CA-028517ClosedEast Saint Louis, ILRegion 14Workers in the unit 101
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 9 January 2006Case 16-CA-024737ClosedWaco, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 94
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 22 November 2005Case 11-CA-021007ClosedKingwood, TXRegion 10Workers in the unit 10
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 30 September 2005Case 20-CA-032716ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,500
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 16 September 2005Case 29-CA-027174ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 29 August 2005Case 16-CA-024477ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 22
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 25 July 2005Case 29-CA-027080ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 60
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 29 April 2005Case 19-CA-029758ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2005Case 16-CA-024242ClosedWaco, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 95
AKAL Security
RC
Filed 23 March 2005Case 28-RC-006357ClosedEspanola, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 68
Included: All full-time and shared position United states Marshals Service (USMS), credentialed Court Security Officer (CSO's), Lead Court Security Officers (LCSO's), and Senior Lead Court Security Officer (SLCSO's) assigned to the federal courthouses and other United States Justice Department related office buildings pursuant to the Employer's contract(s) with the USMS for security within the jurisdictional ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 February 2005Case 13-CA-042411ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 December 2004Case 13-CA-042314ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 15
AKAL Security
CA
Filed 23 July 2004Case 13-CA-042030ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 240
AKAL Security
RD
Filed 31 March 2004Case 12-RD-000971ClosedSanta Cruz, NMRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 April 2001Case 28-CA-017099ClosedSanta Cruz, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 February 2001Case 28-CA-017034ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 June 1999Case 29-CA-022794ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 50

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.