Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Allied Barton Security Services

72 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 72 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 09, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 22, 27, 29, 32 · Alexandria, VA; Arlington, VA; Baltimore, MD; Bellevue, WA; Boston, MA; Bridgeton, MO and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	65
RC	Petition for an election	5
RD	Petition to decertify	2

The cases

Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 28 July 2016Case 05-RD-181063ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 250
Included: All full-time and regular part-time security officers of the employer employed; Excluded: All office clerical employees, managerial employees, and supervisors as defined in the Act
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2015Case 05-CA-166520ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 December 2015Case 29-CA-166279ClosedQueens, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 November 2015Case 05-CA-164525ClosedArlington, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 7
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2015Case 02-CA-164169ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 2 November 2015Case 04-RC-163090ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 15
Included: All regular part-time and full time employees of the Employer engaged in providing Security services under the Employer's contract in the 1800 block of Lombard Ave., Philadelphia, PA. Excluded: All clerical, confidential, administrative, managerial and Supervisory personnel as defined in the National Labor Relations Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2015Case 05-CA-161421ClosedAlexandria, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2015Case 05-CA-160940ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2015Case 05-CA-160374Closedwashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2015Case 05-CA-157289ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 10
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 9 July 2015Case 29-RC-155636ClosedManhasset, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 17
Included: All full time and regular part-time employees of the Employer engaged in providing security services on the Employer's contract at Americom/Americana Malls at 2028 Northern Blvd. Manhasset and 130 Wheatley Plaza Greenville in Suffolk County New York. Excluded: All clerical, confidential, managerial and supervisory employees as defined in the National Labor Relations Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 May 2015Case 12-CA-152523ClosedJacksonville, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 April 2015Case 05-CA-149869ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2015Case 19-CA-146914ClosedTukwila, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 9 February 2015Case 09-CA-146038ClosedLOUISVILLE, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 20
ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 5 February 2015Case 18-CA-145803ClosedMINNEAPOLIS, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 50
ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 19 December 2014Case 18-CA-143200ClosedMINNEAPOLIS, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 November 2014Case 04-CA-140609ClosedConshohocken, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 October 2014Case 04-CA-138752ClosedRidley Park, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 August 2014Case 05-CA-134611ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2014Case 05-CA-130023ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2014Case 05-CA-129932ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 September 2013Case 29-CA-112768ClosedElmhurst, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 21 June 2013Case 09-CA-107744ClosedLOUISVILLE, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 16
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 May 2013Case 13-CA-104156ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 March 2013Case 07-CA-100912ClosedDearborn, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 14
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2012Case 13-CA-094486ClosedMerrillville, INRegion 13Workers in the unit 57
ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 15 November 2012Case 18-CA-093302ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2012Case 03-CA-092030ClosedBuffalo, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2012Case 03-CA-091455ClosedBuffalo, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 June 2012Case 13-CA-083023ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 100
ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 24 January 2012Case 09-CA-073100ClosedLOUISVILLE, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 480
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2011Case 02-CA-070009ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2011Case 14-CA-067889ClosedBridgeton, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 September 2011Case 07-CA-065320ClosedConshohocken, PARegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 August 2011Case 01-CA-062245ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 60
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 7 July 2011Case 07-RC-060932ClosedRomeo, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 11
Included: All full time and Regular part time Security Officers Excluded: Supervisors
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 1 July 2011Case 07-RC-060796ClosedLivonia, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 17
Included All full time and regular part time security officers Excluded Supervisors
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2011Case 09-CA-060019ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 March 2011Case 27-CA-021863ClosedLakewood, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 February 2011Case 13-CA-046603ClosedNorthbrook, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 February 2011Case 13-CA-046590ClosedKing of Prussia, PARegion 13Workers in the unit 26
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2011Case 05-CA-036377ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 December 2010Case 09-CA-046181ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 August 2010Case 02-CA-040089ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 April 2010Case 01-CA-046101ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 70
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2010Case 07-CA-052776ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 February 2010Case 04-CA-037331ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 January 2010Case 07-CA-052665ClosedRoseville, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2009Case 05-CA-035323ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 September 2009Case 02-CA-039498ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2009Case 32-CA-024713ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 3 September 2009Case 04-RC-021590ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 130
All full time and regular part time security guards employed by the Employer at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, including the Main Building, Perelman Building, Rodin Museum, Mount Pleasant and Cedar Grove.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2009Case 02-CA-039462ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2009Case 22-CA-028924ClosedLyndhurst, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 May 2009Case 22-CA-028917ClosedLyndhurst, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 October 2008Case 19-CA-031559ClosedTukwila, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 5 June 2008Case 02-RD-001565ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,100
Included: All full and part-time unarmed security guards, employed by the employer at Department of City Administrative Services sites within New York City. Excluded: All armed security guards, managerial, clerical, supervisory and non-guard or employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2008Case 19-CA-031207ClosedBellevue, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 November 2007Case 13-CA-044416ClosedNorthbrook, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 November 2007Case 02-CA-038537ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2007Case 13-CA-044211ClosedNaperville, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 June 2007Case 02-CA-038296ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 May 2007Case 29-CA-028305ClosedNew York, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 40,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 April 2007Case 20-CA-033385ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2007Case 29-CA-028225ClosedStaten Island, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 40,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 January 2007Case 04-CA-035150ClosedKing of Prussia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 September 2006Case 04-CA-034910ClosedKing of Prussia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 June 2006Case 04-CA-034697ClosedKing of Prussia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 March 2006Case 20-CA-032938ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2006Case 01-CA-043144ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 March 2006Case 06-CA-035088ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 100

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.