Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Allied Waste

63 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 63 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 03, 08, 09, 10, 13, 15, 16, 19, 20, 25, 32 · Abilene, TX; Altanta, GA; Auburn, MA; Brewton, AL; Brewtpn, AL; Chicago, IL and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	54
RC	Petition for an election	4
RD	Petition to decertify	3
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	2

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2012Case 15-CA-075401ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2012Case 15-CA-071958ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 November 2011Case 15-CA-068516ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 October 2011Case 15-CA-067001ClosedPensacola, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 September 2011Case 15-CA-064840ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 September 2011Case 15-CA-064834ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 September 2011Case 15-CA-064525ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2011Case 15-CA-063434ClosedBrewton, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 August 2011Case 15-CA-063221ClosedBrewtpn, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 August 2011Case 15-CA-063201ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 August 2011Case 15-CA-062510ClosedPensacola, FLRegion 15Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 August 2011Case 15-CA-061967ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2011Case 15-CA-061727ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2011Case 15-CA-061723ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 July 2011Case 15-CA-061611ClosedPensacola, FLRegion 15Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 July 2011Case 15-CA-061610ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 July 2011Case 15-CA-061433ClosedPensacola, FLRegion 15Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2011Case 15-CA-020082ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2011Case 15-CA-020081ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 June 2011Case 15-CA-020073ClosedBrewton, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2011Case 15-CA-020039ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2011Case 15-CA-020038ClosedBrewton, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2011Case 15-CA-020036ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 May 2011Case 15-CA-020025ClosedPensacola, FLRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 April 2011Case 15-CA-019994ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 June 2010Case 16-CA-027473ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2010Case 15-CA-019531ClosedPensacola, FLRegion 15Workers in the unit 50
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 6 January 2010Case 20-RC-018283ClosedSan Carlos, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 30
Customer service representatives, operations clerks, dispatch clerks, accountants, accounting clerks. Excluded: Guards, supervisors.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 November 2009Case 13-CA-045656ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 October 2009Case 33-CA-015917ClosedDixon, ILRegion 25Workers in the unit 45
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 October 2009Case 33-CA-015912ClosedDixon, ILRegion 25Workers in the unit 45
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 2 October 2009Case 20-RD-002480ClosedSan Carlos, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 28
All full time and regular part-time employees employed by the Employer in its maintenance department, including all mechanics, welders, painters and maintenance utility employees at its facility located at 225 Shoreway Road, San Carlos, California Excluded: All other employees, including all drivers and employees represented by another labor organization, office clerical employees, clerks, secretarial employees, ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2009Case 15-CA-019079ClosedPensacola, FLRegion 15Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2009Case 15-CA-019077ClosedBrewton, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2009Case 03-CA-027170ClosedPensacola, FLRegion 03Workers in the unit 50
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 21 January 2009Case 19-RD-003810ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 12
Included: Teamsters Union Local 174, customer service reps, edm. assistants, operations clerks, A/R clerks, A/P clerks, payroll benefits clerks, Maint. clerks. Receptionists employed at 54 S Dawson Street facility, Seattle, Washington. Excluded: Managerial employees, H/R coordinator, controller, staff accountant, state employees, guards and supervisors.
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 14 January 2009Case 20-RD-002473ClosedSan Carlos, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 28
All full-time and regular part-time employees employed by the Employer in its maintenance department, including all mechanics, welders, painters and maintenance utility employees at its facility located at 225 Shoreway Road, San Carlos, California All other employees, including all drivers and employees represented by another labor organization, office clerical employees, clerks, secretarial employees, Tandem and ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 December 2008Case 32-CA-024248ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2008Case 15-CA-018840ClosedPensacola, FLRegion 15Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2008Case 15-CA-018837ClosedPensacola, FLRegion 15Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2008Case 01-CA-044959ClosedAuburn, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 75
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 19 September 2008Case 32-RC-005586ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Included: Full-time and regular part-time drivers; Yard Maintenance Utility Employee. Excluded: All other employees, employees provided by temporary employment agencies, all employees, guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 8 September 2008Case 32-RC-005583ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 46
Included: Full-time and regular part-time drivers, yard maintenance utility employee. Excluded: All other employees, employees provided by temporary employment agencies, all office clerical employees, guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 August 2008Case 26-CA-023135ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 January 2008Case 10-CA-037173ClosedAltanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 100
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 28 December 2007Case 32-UC-000423ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 46
Included: Union seeks to include employee Lia Lee in the bargaining unit. Excluded: Supervisors
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2007Case 26-CA-022935ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 November 2007Case 26-CA-022926ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 200
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 25 September 2007Case 32-UC-000422ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 45
Included: Union seeks to include employee Lee Lia in the bargaining unit. Excluded: Others
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2007Case 32-CA-023544ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 45
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2007Case 26-CA-022815ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15
ALLIED WASTE
CA
Filed 18 May 2007Case 09-CA-043615ClosedLesage, WVRegion 09Workers in the unit 87
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 May 2007Case 32-CA-023243ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 October 2006Case 08-CA-036839ClosedElyria, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 100
ALLIED WASTE
CA
Filed 12 September 2006Case 09-CA-043105ClosedLesage, WVRegion 09Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 March 2006Case 16-CA-024837ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2006Case 16-CA-024740ClosedAbilene, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 September 2005Case 16-CA-024527ClosedAbilene, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2005Case 16-CA-024419ClosedAbilene, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 June 2005Case 16-CA-024325ClosedAbilene, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 30
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 15 August 2003Case 13-RC-021034ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2003Case 13-CA-040868ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2000Case 19-CA-027260ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 60

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.