Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

American Building Maintenance

139 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 139 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21, 27, 28, 29, 31 · Alexandria, VA; Brooklyn, NY; Century City, CA; Chicago, IL; Detroit, MI; El Paso, TX and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	136
RC	Petition for an election	1
RD	Petition to decertify	1
UD	Petition on union security	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2023Case 02-CA-330530ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2023Case 02-CA-330515ClosedManhattan, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 August 2023Case 18-CA-323338ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 June 2023Case 18-CA-320602ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 April 2023Case 18-CA-316464ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 October 2019Case 04-CA-249889ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 17
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 October 2019Case 04-CA-249886ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 May 2017Case 19-CA-198867ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2017Case 19-CA-198050ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CA
Filed 5 April 2017Case 21-CA-196394ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 September 2015Case 20-CA-160392ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 August 2015Case 31-CA-158713ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 2015Case 31-CA-157719ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 2015Case 31-CA-157718ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 June 2015Case 27-CA-153831ClosedEnglewood, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 102
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 December 2014Case 07-CA-143226ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 November 2014Case 31-CA-140567ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 May 2014Case 19-CA-129256ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2014Case 02-CA-128297ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2014Case 02-CA-128293ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2014Case 02-CA-128291ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 April 2014Case 19-CA-125845ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 150
AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CA
Filed 26 March 2014Case 31-CA-125311ClosedCentury City, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 3
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 January 2014Case 19-CA-121317ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2014Case 31-CA-120812ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 January 2014Case 31-CA-120010ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 January 2014Case 31-CA-120006ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 December 2013Case 31-CA-120007ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1,000
AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CA
Filed 26 November 2013Case 21-CA-117877ClosedLOS ANGELES, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,000
AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CA
Filed 22 October 2013Case 21-CA-115428ClosedLOS ANGELES, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,000
AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CA
Filed 24 September 2013Case 02-CA-114007ClosedNEW YORK, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 11
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 July 2013Case 19-CA-109242ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 June 2013Case 19-CA-107477ClosedSEATTLE, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 May 2013Case 31-CA-106332ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1,000
AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CA
Filed 21 February 2013Case 18-CA-098911ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 10
AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CA
Filed 21 February 2013Case 18-CA-098841ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 February 2013Case 31-CA-098166ClosedLOS ANGELES, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 December 2012Case 31-CA-095496ClosedLOS ANGELES, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2012Case 31-CA-094652ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2012Case 31-CA-091602ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CA
Filed 9 October 2012Case 02-CA-090898ClosedNEW YORK, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2012Case 01-CA-089790ClosedSomerville, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2012Case 19-CA-085549ClosedSpokane, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 180
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 July 2012Case 21-CA-084631ClosedLOS ANGELES, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2012Case 31-CA-083231ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 June 2012Case 21-CA-082823ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 June 2012Case 19-CA-082740ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 600
AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CA
Filed 6 June 2012Case 02-CA-082543ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 April 2012Case 31-CA-079806ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2012Case 31-CA-078307ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CA
Filed 20 March 2012Case 02-CA-077014ClosedNEW YORK, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2012Case 31-CA-076072ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 February 2012Case 21-CA-074546ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2012Case 21-CA-074212ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 January 2012Case 31-CA-073670ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 January 2012Case 31-CA-073056ClosedLOS ANGELES, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1,000
AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CA
Filed 5 January 2012Case 21-CA-071969ClosedLOS ANGELES, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 December 2011Case 31-CA-071225ClosedLOS ANGELES, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2011Case 31-CA-069126ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 November 2011Case 02-CA-068722ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2011Case 29-CA-067673ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2011Case 29-CA-067662ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 October 2011Case 21-CA-067193ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2011Case 02-CA-065909ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2011Case 02-CA-065054ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 2011Case 02-CA-063122ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 March 2011Case 29-CA-030705ClosedFlushing, NYRegion 29
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 February 2011Case 02-CA-040362ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 70
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 September 2010Case 21-CA-039490ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 19
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 August 2010Case 07-CA-053112ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 22
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2010Case 31-CA-029883ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2010Case 31-CA-029882ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2010Case 31-CA-029880ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition on union security
UD
Filed 16 July 2010Case 31-UD-000301ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 36
Included: All employees coming under the classifications of the Agreement or performing the duties of those classifications, covered work shall include: airline ticket offices and non-public areas, ramps, storage facilities, maintenance facilities, cargo area facilities, all work contracted for by the City of Los Angeles, Department of Airports, and any covered work at all LAX terminals. Excluded: Any employee or ...
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 2 July 2010Case 31-RD-001609ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 36
Included: All employees coming under the classifications of the Agreement or performing the duties of those classifications, covered work shall include: airline ticket offices and non-public areas, ramps, storage facilities, maintenance facilities, cargo area facilities, all work contracted for by the City of Los Angeles, Department of Airports, and any covered work at all LAX terminals. Excluded: Any employee or ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 March 2010Case 06-CA-036850ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 November 2009Case 20-CA-034766ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 November 2009Case 20-CA-034765ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 November 2009Case 20-CA-034764ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 November 2009Case 18-CA-019212ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2009Case 13-CA-045614ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 38
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2009Case 02-CA-039545ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 September 2009Case 31-CA-029442ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 September 2009Case 21-CA-038996ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 7
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 September 2009Case 31-CA-029403ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 May 2009Case 18-CA-019054ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 February 2009Case 02-CA-039170ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 February 2009Case 02-CA-039145ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2009Case 02-CA-039137ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2009Case 02-CA-039119ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 December 2008Case 20-CA-034245ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 November 2008Case 02-CA-039056ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 September 2008Case 07-CA-051488ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 September 2008Case 21-CA-038485ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 December 2007Case 05-CA-034018ClosedAlexandria, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 December 2007Case 18-CA-018587ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 November 2007Case 05-CA-033952ClosedAlexandria, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2007Case 34-CA-011873ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 75,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2007Case 01-CA-044262ClosedWallingford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 75,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 October 2007Case 04-CA-035708ClosedNew York, NYRegion 04Workers in the unit 75,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2007Case 20-CA-033545ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 July 2007Case 02-CA-038371ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 June 2007Case 18-CA-018407ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 April 2007Case 07-CA-050291ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 14
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2007Case 03-CA-026251ClosedUtica, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 72
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2007Case 07-CA-050197ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 43
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 January 2007Case 18-CA-018293ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2007Case 18-CA-018289ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2007Case 20-CA-033255ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2007Case 18-CA-018285ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2007Case 18-CA-018274ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 January 2007Case 18-CA-018269ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 January 2007Case 18-CA-018261ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 January 2007Case 18-CA-018258ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 December 2006Case 20-CA-033231ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 December 2006Case 18-CA-018236ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 October 2006Case 20-CA-033169ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 October 2006Case 20-CA-033154ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 October 2006Case 20-CA-033153ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 26
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 September 2006Case 20-CA-033134ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 August 2006Case 02-CA-037816ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2006Case 06-CA-035247ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2006Case 06-CA-035246ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2006Case 06-CA-035083ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 10
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 11 August 2005Case 28-RC-006401ClosedEl Paso, TXRegion 28Workers in the unit 9
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 May 2005Case 02-CA-036997ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2005Case 20-CA-032397ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 May 2004Case 30-CA-016823ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2003Case 06-CA-033805ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 November 2003Case 30-CA-016639ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2000Case 02-CA-033390ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 April 2000Case 21-CA-033936ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 200
AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CA
Filed 14 April 2000Case 21-CA-033930ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2000Case 21-CA-033887ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2000Case 21-CA-033886ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2000Case 21-CA-033885ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2000Case 21-CA-033884ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 1998Case 20-CA-028396ClosedOakland, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 December 1996Case 20-CA-027581ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 5

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.