Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Americold Logistics

53 cases in this site's copy of the record · 1 of those 53 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 04, 05, 10, 14, 16, 18, 19, 21, 25, 28, 31, 32 · ATLANTA, GA; Atlanta, GA; Bethlehem, PA; Bettendorf, IA; Carson, CA; Carthage, MO and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	45
RC	Petition for an election	6
RD	Petition to decertify	2

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2026Case 01-CA-379122OpenPlainville, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 50
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 16 May 2024Case 18-RD-342406ClosedDarien, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 53
Included: All full-time and regular part-time warehouse associates, including maintenance employees, sanitation employees, inventory control associates, and warehouse leads, employed by the employer at the Darien, Wisconsin facility. Excluded: Office clerical employees, confidential employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 October 2023Case 04-CA-327905ClosedFogelsville, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 October 2023Case 04-CA-327901ClosedFogelsville, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 October 2022Case 25-CA-304998ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 75
AMERICOLD LOGISTICS
CA
Filed 2 March 2022Case 01-CA-291517ClosedGloucester, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2021Case 28-CA-286534ClosedTolleson, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 September 2021Case 01-CA-282434ClosedGloucester, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 April 2021Case 19-CA-275843ClosedWallula, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 February 2021Case 21-CA-273298ClosedCarson, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 15
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 24 September 2018Case 25-RD-227840ClosedRochelle, ILRegion 25Workers in the unit 136
Included: All full-time and part-time warehouse employees; Excluded: Office clerical employees, maintenance employees, customer service representatives, foremen
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 14 March 2018Case 10-RC-216578ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 40
ATTACHMENT The Petitioner presently represents employees of Americold Logistics in the following unit: All warehouse employees employed by the Employer, including maintenance employees at its Westgate, 1740 Westgate Parkway; Southgate/Skygate, 1845 Westgate Parkway; Tradewater, 6500 Tradewater; and Lakewood, 3300 Lakewood Ave., S.W. facilities in Atlanta, Georgia; and its Sprouts, 1239 Oakley Drive facility in East ...
AmeriCold Logistics
CA
Filed 21 February 2018Case 25-CA-215310ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 October 2017Case 14-CA-208027ClosedCarthage, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2016Case 10-CA-184782ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2016Case 14-CA-176669ClosedCarthage, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2016Case 25-CA-170496ClosedBettendorf, IARegion 25Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2016Case 25-CA-170483ClosedBettendorf, IARegion 25Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 July 2015Case 14-CA-155501ClosedCarthage, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 160
AMERICOLD LOGISTICS
CA
Filed 26 May 2015Case 01-CA-152883ClosedGLOUCESTER, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 32
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2014Case 04-CA-140518ClosedFogelsville, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 May 2014Case 04-CA-129401ClosedFogelsville, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 May 2014Case 25-CA-128011ClosedBettendorf, IARegion 25Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2014Case 25-CA-127527ClosedBettendorf, IARegion 25Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 February 2014Case 10-CA-122147ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 50
AMERICOLD LOGISTICS
CA
Filed 12 December 2013Case 04-CA-118966ClosedFOGELSVILLE, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 150
AMERICOLD LOGISTICS
CA
Filed 22 November 2013Case 04-CA-117703ClosedFOGELSVILLE, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 September 2013Case 25-CA-114442ClosedBettendorf, IARegion 25Workers in the unit 80
AMERICOLD LOGISTICS
CA
Filed 25 September 2013Case 18-CA-114066ClosedPark Rapids, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 50
AMERICOLD LOGISTICS
CA
Filed 7 August 2013Case 04-CA-110836ClosedATLANTA, GARegion 04Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 March 2013Case 25-CA-099436ClosedBettendorf, IARegion 25Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 March 2013Case 25-CA-099429ClosedBettendorf, IARegion 25Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 October 2011Case 14-CA-065929ClosedRock Island, ILRegion 14Workers in the unit 44
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2011Case 16-CA-064451ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 August 2010Case 04-CA-037642ClosedBethlehem, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2010Case 04-CA-037625ClosedBethlehem, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 25
AMERICOLD LOGISTICS
RC
Filed 14 July 2009Case 25-RC-010468ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 130
All full-time and regular part-time warehouse employees at the Indianapolis, IN location BUT EXCLUDING all office clerical employees, all sales employees, all professional employees, temporary agency employees, all guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2009Case 10-CA-037972ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2009Case 25-CA-031055ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 140
AmeriCold Logistics
RC
Filed 15 October 2008Case 18-RC-017608ClosedPark Rapids, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 3
Included: All full-time and part-time office/clerical, shipping and receiving clerks.
AmeriCold Logistics
RC
Filed 16 September 2008Case 32-RC-005585ClosedWatsonville, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 10
Included: All full-time and part-time warehouse employees employed by the employer at its 750 W. Riverside Drive, Watsonville, California facility. Excluded: All other employees, including all office and plant clericals, guards, and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 August 2008Case 01-CA-044910ClosedGloucester, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 50
AmeriCold Logistics
RC
Filed 26 August 2008Case 18-RC-017597ClosedPark Rapids, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 40
Included: All full-time and regular part-time warehouse employees, maintenance employees, clerical and crew leaders. Excluded: Drivers and any guards and sueprvisors as defined by the Act.
AmeriCold Logistics
CA
Filed 7 May 2008Case 05-CA-034300ClosedManchester, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 130
AmeriCold Logistics
CA
Filed 7 May 2008Case 05-CA-034299ClosedManchester, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 130
AmeriCold Logistics
CA
Filed 23 April 2008Case 31-CA-028709ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 November 2007Case 10-CA-037133ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 428
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 16 November 2007Case 05-RC-016174ClosedManchester, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 115
Included: All full-time and part-time warehouse employees including but not limited to: (lift truck operators, dock clerks, inventory control, maintenance, and sanitation depts..) Excluded: All professional employees, managers supervisors, and guards as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2007Case 33-CA-015383ClosedBettendorf, IARegion 25Workers in the unit 41
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2006Case 04-CA-035028ClosedFogelsville, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2006Case 17-CA-023706ClosedCarthage, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 50
AmeriCold Logistics
CA
Filed 17 June 2002Case 17-CA-021726ClosedCarthage, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 225
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 September 1999Case 31-CA-024115ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 70

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.