Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

BAE Systems

94 cases in this site's copy of the record · 3 of those 94 are marked open by the Board · Region 05, 09, 10, 12, 16, 19, 20, 25, 32 · Arlington, VA; Beale AFB, CA; Beale Air Force Base, CA; Clear Air Force Station, AK; Clear, AK; Fort Wayne, IN and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	91
RC	Petition for an election	2
RD	Petition to decertify	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 May 2025Case 05-CA-366389ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2025Case 32-CA-360037OpenSan Jose, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2024Case 10-CA-351585ClosedRadford, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2024Case 10-CA-351521ClosedRadford, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2024Case 10-CA-351493ClosedRadford, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2024Case 10-CA-351482OpenRadford, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2024Case 10-CA-351481ClosedRadford, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2024Case 10-CA-351475ClosedRadford, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 800
BAE SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 5 August 2024Case 09-CA-347749OpenLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 December 2022Case 05-CA-308656ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 804
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 January 2022Case 10-CA-289335ClosedRadford, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2021Case 19-CA-283890ClosedRedmond, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 February 2021Case 05-CA-272934ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 720
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 June 2020Case 05-CA-261957ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 February 2020Case 19-CA-256994ClosedKeyport, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 125
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 February 2020Case 05-CA-256737ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 571
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2020Case 05-CA-256059ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 571
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2019Case 05-CA-248905ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 508
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 May 2019Case 05-CA-241453ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 484
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 March 2019Case 05-CA-237481ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 March 2019Case 05-CA-237475ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 488
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2019Case 05-CA-235565ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 494
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2019Case 05-CA-234329ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 494
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 December 2018Case 20-CA-233320ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 72
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 December 2018Case 20-CA-233319ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 72
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2018Case 10-CA-225548ClosedRadford, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 May 2018Case 05-CA-221801ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 506
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 May 2018Case 25-CA-221289ClosedFort Wayne, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 750
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 February 2017Case 05-CA-193580ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 435
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2016Case 05-CA-190374ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 445
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2016Case 05-CA-190357ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 445
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 December 2016Case 05-CA-189502ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2016Case 05-CA-189555ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 402
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2016Case 05-CA-187856ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 407
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 November 2016Case 05-CA-187504ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 402
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 September 2016Case 05-CA-185200ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 500
BAE SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 25 August 2016Case 09-CA-182880ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 125
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 2016Case 05-CA-182568ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 366
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 2016Case 05-CA-182561ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 366
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2016Case 19-CA-177846ClosedClear, AKRegion 19Workers in the unit 101
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 March 2016Case 05-CA-172344ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 800
BAE SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 12 February 2016Case 05-CA-169626ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 November 2015Case 05-CA-163341ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 297
BAE SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 30 October 2015Case 05-CA-163154ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 297
BAE SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 25 August 2015Case 25-CA-158731ClosedFort Wayne, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 1,000
BAE SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 24 August 2015Case 05-CA-158628ClosedArlington, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2015Case 05-CA-147384ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 2015Case 05-CA-146766ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 312
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 February 2015Case 05-CA-146276ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 312
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2015Case 20-CA-144973ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 November 2014Case 20-CA-140951ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 October 2014Case 10-CA-139450ClosedRadford, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2014Case 20-CA-139079ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 August 2014Case 12-CA-135823ClosedJacksonville, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 April 2014Case 05-CA-126254ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 344
BAE SYSTEMS
RC
Filed 3 February 2014Case 20-RC-121773ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2013Case 05-CA-117606ClosedArlington, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 399
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 August 2013Case 20-CA-112211ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2013Case 05-CA-111114ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 402
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 April 2013Case 05-CA-102134ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 December 2012Case 05-CA-095315ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2012Case 05-CA-087755ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 475
BAE SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 20 August 2012Case 05-CA-087754ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 475
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 July 2012Case 05-CA-085350ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 July 2012Case 20-CA-085227ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 200
BAE SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 24 May 2012Case 05-CA-081970ClosedYORK, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 April 2012Case 05-CA-078506ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,300
BAE SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 2 April 2012Case 05-CA-078042ClosedYORK, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 March 2012Case 16-CA-076974ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 160
BAE SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 26 September 2011Case 05-CA-065422ClosedYORK, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 May 2011Case 19-CA-033074ClosedClear Air Force Station, AKRegion 19Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2011Case 05-CA-036368ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 685
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2010Case 20-CA-035296ClosedBeale Air Force Base, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2010Case 20-CA-035264ClosedBeale AFB, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 September 2010Case 16-CA-027637ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2010Case 19-CA-032553ClosedClear Air Force Station, AKRegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 March 2010Case 20-CA-034965ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2010Case 37-CA-007942ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 350
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 2 February 2010Case 37-RD-000429ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 162
All full-time and regular part-time workers within the maintenance department that hold the classifications of general maintenance, mechanics, mechanic helpers, maintenance helpers, welders, technicians, locksmiths, painters, fabric workers, tools and parts attendants, material handlers, forklift operators, construction repairers and small arms repairers employed by the Employer at Schofield Army Base in Mililani, ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2009Case 05-CA-035328ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 September 2009Case 37-CA-007833ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 September 2009Case 37-CA-007832ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 September 2009Case 37-CA-007831ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 July 2009Case 37-CA-007802ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 July 2009Case 37-CA-007801ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 350
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 3 November 2008Case 37-RC-004194ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 162
INCLUDED: All full-time and regular part-time employees in the Maintenance Division employed by the Employer at Schofield Army Base, Mililani, Hawaii. (All full-time and regular part-time workers within the Maintenance Department that hold the classifications of General Maintenance, Mechanics, Mechanic Helpers, Welders, Techinicians, Locksmiths, Painters, Fabric WOrkers, Dispatchers, Tool & Parts Attendants, ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 October 2008Case 37-CA-007644ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 July 2008Case 20-CA-034050ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2008Case 16-CA-026213ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 October 2007Case 37-CA-007438ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 October 2007Case 37-CA-007437ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 July 2007Case 16-CA-025696ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 April 2007Case 16-CA-025558ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 1,100
BAE SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 17 April 2006Case 09-CA-042788ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 177

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.