Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Bimbo Bakeries USA

276 cases in this site's copy of the record · 24 of those 276 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 03, 04, 05, 06, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31 · ALBANY, NY; Albany, NY; Albuquerque, NM; Alsip, IL; Arlington, TX; Bakersfield, CA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	270
RC	Petition for an election	6

The cases

Page 2 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2022Case 28-CA-294445ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 January 2022Case 28-CA-289326ClosedLos Ranchos de Albuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 December 2021Case 16-CA-288297ClosedSan Antonio, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 190
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 October 2021Case 16-CA-284378ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 21
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
CA
Filed 7 October 2021Case 16-CA-284229ClosedMcKinney, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 21
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 August 2021Case 16-CA-281491ClosedMcKinney, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 3
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 July 2021Case 16-CA-280179ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 233
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2021Case 16-CA-278024ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 232
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2021Case 16-CA-275781ClosedRockwall, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2021Case 16-CA-275773ClosedRockwall, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 232
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 April 2021Case 28-CA-275470ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 2021Case 16-CA-274935ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 232
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 March 2021Case 16-CA-274723ClosedArlington, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 March 2021Case 16-CA-273850ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 January 2021Case 16-CA-271507ClosedSchertz, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 42
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 December 2020Case 10-CA-270846ClosedMcdonough, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 3
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 December 2020Case 16-CA-270374ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 240
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 December 2020Case 16-CA-270071ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 240
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 December 2020Case 16-CA-270065ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 240
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 November 2020Case 16-CA-268732ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 240
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 November 2020Case 14-CA-268609ClosedMattoon, ILRegion 14Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 October 2020Case 14-CA-267767ClosedMattoon, ILRegion 14Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 September 2020Case 10-CA-266017ClosedDecatur, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 275
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2020Case 20-CA-265890ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2020Case 20-CA-265888ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 August 2020Case 16-CA-264448ClosedGarland, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 July 2020Case 01-CA-262501ClosedGreenwich, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 July 2020Case 01-CA-262482ClosedGreenwich, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 July 2020Case 01-CA-262420ClosedGreenwich, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 May 2020Case 13-CA-260355ClosedCicero, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 May 2020Case 16-CA-260407ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 230
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2020Case 16-CA-259741ClosedSan Antonio, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 140
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 April 2020Case 16-CA-259041ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 232
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 April 2020Case 14-CA-259029ClosedKansas City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 2020Case 28-CA-256586ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2020Case 16-CA-256291ClosedSan Antonio, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 January 2020Case 16-CA-255292ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 230
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2020Case 16-CA-254655ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 230
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2020Case 16-CA-254512ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 230
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2020Case 16-CA-254460ClosedGrand Prairie, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 November 2019Case 16-CA-251320ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 230
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 September 2019Case 16-CA-248655ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 230
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 September 2019Case 16-CA-247683ClosedRockwall, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 September 2019Case 22-CA-247594ClosedKearny, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 37
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 July 2019Case 16-CA-245780ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 220
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 July 2019Case 16-CA-245290ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 220
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 June 2019Case 20-CA-243651ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 April 2019Case 01-CA-239971ClosedGreenwich, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 March 2019Case 16-CA-238758ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 185
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 March 2019Case 28-CA-236945ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2019Case 28-CA-235382ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 January 2019Case 29-CA-233515ClosedMaspeth, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 20,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 September 2018Case 16-CA-228029ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 225
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 September 2018Case 14-CA-227704ClosedWichita, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 August 2018Case 28-CA-225820ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2018Case 31-CA-224983ClosedFontana, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 June 2018Case 22-CA-221911ClosedSouth Plainfield, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 50
Bimbo Bakeries, USA
CA
Filed 26 February 2018Case 01-CA-215557ClosedGreenwich, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 325
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2018Case 13-CA-214067ClosedAlsip, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 October 2017Case 03-CA-208400ClosedAlbany, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 April 2017Case 27-CA-196268ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 125
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 February 2017Case 10-CA-192816ClosedGastonia, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 January 2017Case 16-CA-191805ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 185
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 December 2016Case 28-CA-189720ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 4
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 October 2016Case 27-CA-185990ClosedCommerce City, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 October 2016Case 19-CA-185759ClosedKent, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 102
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
CA
Filed 4 October 2016Case 09-CA-185632ClosedLondon, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 140
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 June 2016Case 04-CA-177858ClosedBirmingham, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2016Case 27-CA-173235ClosedSalt Lake City, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2016Case 04-CA-169583ClosedBirmingham, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 December 2015Case 15-CA-165409ClosedMERIDIAN, MSRegion 15Workers in the unit 220
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
CA
Filed 31 August 2015Case 22-CA-159039ClosedSOUTH PLAINFIELD, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 August 2015Case 28-CA-158214ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 June 2015Case 16-CA-153619ClosedArlington, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 76
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
CA
Filed 26 May 2015Case 16-CA-153055ClosedArlington, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 76
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
CA
Filed 23 May 2015Case 25-CA-153004ClosedOwensboro, KYRegion 25Workers in the unit 100
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 22 May 2015Case 16-RC-152831ClosedArlington, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 13
Included: Maintenance, Shipping and receiving. Excluded: All other emplyees, including break relief, drivers, mixers, ovens, rackers, slicers, packers, vacarion relief, supervisors, managers, office clerical, professional, guards, quality.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2015Case 16-CA-152768ClosedRockwall, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 100
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
CA
Filed 1 May 2015Case 09-CA-151615ClosedLONDON, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 133
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 30 April 2015Case 16-RC-151211ClosedArlington, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 63
INCLUDED: All Breakers, Dividers, Mixers, Ovens, Rackers, Slicers, and Packers. EXCLUDED: Supervisors, Managers, Office, Clerical, and Professional Employees.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 24 April 2015Case 16-RC-150819ClosedArlington, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 63
INCLUDED: ALL BREAKERS, DIVIDERS, MIXERS, OVENS, RACKERS, SLICERS, AND PACKERS. EXCLUDED: SUPERVISORS, MANAGERS, OFFICE, CLERICAL, AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES.
BIMBO BAKERIES (USA)
CA
Filed 3 February 2015Case 21-CA-145701ClosedESCONDIDO, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 50
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
CA
Filed 5 January 2015Case 09-CA-143849ClosedLONDON, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 November 2014Case 31-CA-140677ClosedEscondido, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 800
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
CA
Filed 20 October 2014Case 21-CA-139109ClosedMONTEBELLO, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 800
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
CA
Filed 15 September 2014Case 21-CA-136878ClosedESCONDIDO, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 June 2014Case 20-CA-130615ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2014Case 27-CA-129036ClosedCommerce City, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 March 2014Case 27-CA-125555ClosedSalt Lake City, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 260
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 March 2014Case 27-CA-125455ClosedSalt Lake City, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 260
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2014Case 03-CA-123783ClosedALBANY, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 February 2014Case 03-CA-122298ClosedAlbany, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 January 2014Case 16-CA-121592ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 250
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
CA
Filed 21 January 2014Case 12-CA-120864ClosedMIAMI, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 70
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 December 2013Case 03-CA-118990ClosedAlbany, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 350
Bimbo Bakeries, USA
CA
Filed 12 December 2013Case 14-CA-118851ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2013Case 10-CA-116859ClosedDecatur, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 September 2013Case 27-CA-114305ClosedCommerce City, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
CA
Filed 19 August 2013Case 18-CA-111456ClosedSioux City, IARegion 18Workers in the unit 20
Bimbo Bakeries, USA
CA
Filed 20 May 2013Case 16-CA-105621ClosedRockwall, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 51
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
CA
Filed 25 February 2013Case 09-CA-099123ClosedLOUISVILLE, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
CA
Filed 25 February 2013Case 09-CA-099122ClosedLOUISVILLE, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2012Case 28-CA-075854ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 February 2012Case 16-CA-075604ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 320
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
CA
Filed 12 January 2012Case 21-CA-072351ClosedEscondido, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 50
Bimbo Bakeries, USA
CA
Filed 28 June 2011Case 05-CA-060712ClosedCarlisle, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 300
Bimbo Bakeries, USA
CA
Filed 22 November 2010Case 21-CA-039586ClosedEscondido, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 September 2010Case 05-CA-036131ClosedElkridge, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2010Case 16-CA-027341ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 December 2009Case 21-CA-039175ClosedMontebello, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2009Case 16-CA-026961ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 185
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 August 2009Case 04-CA-037007ClosedNorristown, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 165
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2009Case 21-CA-038913ClosedMontebello, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2009Case 16-CA-026828ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 197
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 March 2009Case 31-CA-029160ClosedBakersfield, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 March 2009Case 06-CA-036425ClosedBakersfield, CARegion 06Workers in the unit 50
Bimbo Bakeries, USA
CA
Filed 24 November 2008Case 21-CA-038609ClosedMontebello, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 600
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 5 March 2008Case 16-RC-010834ClosedLubbock, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 12
INCLUDED: Transport Bread Products - Transport Drivers Only. EXCLUDED: All others - including those defined in the act - Managers, Supervisors, Security and Secretaries.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 December 2007Case 21-CA-038157ClosedMontebello, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2007Case 16-CA-025956ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 253
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2007Case 16-CA-025829ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 July 2007Case 21-CA-037896ClosedMontebello, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 600
Bimbo Bakeries, USA
RC
Filed 7 June 2007Case 16-RC-010792ClosedSan Antonio, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 21
INCLUDED: All Part-time and full time traansport drivers and garage mechanics EXCLUDED: All office clerical employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 October 2006Case 21-CA-037493ClosedMontebello, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2004Case 17-CA-022872ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 3
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 18 August 2004Case 17-RC-012294ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 3

Page 2 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.