Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Brinks, Inc.

16 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 16 are marked open by the Board · Region 07, 08, 13, 14, 22, 25, 29 · Brooklyn, NY; Chicago, IL; Cleveland, OH; Detroit, MI; Newark, NJ; Oklahoma City, OK and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	11
RC	Petition for an election	3
RD	Petition to decertify	2

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2019Case 07-CA-235647ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2015Case 13-CA-158790ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 August 2015Case 13-CA-158496ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2015Case 13-CA-158453ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 26 June 2015Case 13-RC-154924ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 106
Included: All Full and Part Time employees performing security duties for the above named employer in and around Chicago and surounding areas.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 May 2015Case 13-CA-152455Closedchicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
BRINKS, INC.
CA
Filed 27 June 2014Case 25-CA-131628ClosedSOUTH BEND, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2012Case 08-CA-075851ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2011Case 08-CA-070782ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 November 2011Case 08-CA-068986ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2009Case 22-CA-029123ClosedNewark, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 60
Brinks Inc.
RD
Filed 2 July 2009Case 22-RD-001522ClosedNewark, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 65
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 10 March 2009Case 29-RC-011732ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 150
Included: All full time and/or regular part time security officers drivers tech auditors & armed vault custodians performing guard duites as defined in section 9 (b)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended employed by brinks inc @ 652Kent Avenue Brooklyn New York 11211 Excluded: All office clerical employees professional employees supervisors as defined in the Act as amended and all other employees
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 14 January 2009Case 17-RC-012604ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 20
Included: ALL FULL TIME AND/OR REGULAR PART TIME SECURITY OFFICERS, DRIVERS, TECH AUDITORS & ARMED VAULT CUSTODIANS PERFORMING GUARD DUTIES AS DEFINED IN SECTION 9(b)(3) OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT, AS AMENDED EMPLOYED BY BRINKS, INC. @ 2800 SHULL AVE., OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73111 Excluded: ALL OFFICE CLERICAL EMPLOYEES, PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES, SUPERVISORS, AS DEFINED INT HE ACT, AS AMENDED, AND ALL OTHER ...
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 15 March 2007Case 22-RD-001470ClosedNewark, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 45
Inc. Guards, drivers, messanger and vault employees. Exc. All other employees and superviors as defined in the act.
Brinks Inc.
CA
Filed 2 April 2001Case 29-CA-024167ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 700

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.