Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Comcast

77 cases in this site's copy of the record · 1 of those 77 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 04, 05, 06, 07, 10, 12, 13, 15, 18, 20, 22, 25, 27, 32 · Absecon, NJ; Afton, TN; Alpharetta, GA; Ann Arbor, MI; Arden Hills, MN; Atlanta, GA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	67
RC	Petition for an election	6
RD	Petition to decertify	4

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 September 2026Case 10-CA-395076OpenNorth Charleston, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2025Case 06-CA-366425ClosedPleasant Hills, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 April 2025Case 06-CA-363897ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 October 2024Case 07-CA-352124ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 August 2023Case 10-CA-323411ClosedAfton, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 1
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 2 May 2023Case 15-RC-317182ClosedLittle Rock, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 25
Included: CTl, CT2, CT3, CT4, CT4 Business, CT4 Home Security, CT5 B, CT5 HS Excluded: NCT4, NCT5, Warehouse, All Guards, Clerical, Supervisors as Defined by the Act
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 3 March 2023Case 15-RC-313284ClosedLittle Rock, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 38
Included: CT1, CT2, CT3, CT4, CT4 Business, CT5 Business, NCT4, NCT5, CT4 Home Security, CT5 Home Security Excluded: Management
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 August 2022Case 13-CA-302088ClosedMerrillville, INRegion 13Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 July 2020Case 04-CA-262729ClosedAbsecon, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2019Case 06-CA-250629ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 170
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2019Case 04-CA-245546ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2019Case 10-CA-242537ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 September 2018Case 05-CA-227631ClosedWinchester, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2018Case 32-CA-213300ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 2017Case 10-CA-204824ClosedGreeneville, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2017Case 10-CA-200022ClosedAlpharetta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 May 2017Case 06-CA-199538ClosedBeaver Falls, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 August 2016Case 12-CA-181408ClosedStuart, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 May 2016Case 18-CA-177439ClosedSaint Paul, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 April 2016Case 04-CA-174203ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2016Case 32-CA-171901ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 January 2016Case 13-CA-168545ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 January 2016Case 13-CA-168065ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 65
COMCAST
CA
Filed 31 July 2015Case 01-CA-157199ClosedBOSTON, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 April 2015Case 32-CA-149548ClosedLivermore, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 114
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 March 2015Case 07-CA-148073ClosedAnn Arbor, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
COMCAST
CA
Filed 27 December 2013Case 04-CA-119711ClosedEGG HARBOR TOWNSHIP, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 100
COMCAST
CA
Filed 14 June 2013Case 04-CA-107299ClosedEgg Harbor Township, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2013Case 32-CA-103995ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 9 April 2013Case 20-RD-102324ClosedBurlingame, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 131
Installer, advanced installer, service technician, system technician, advanced technician, head-end technician, warehouse, ini-store sales employed in Burlingame, Fremont, Pacifica and Menlo Park, CA
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 28 March 2013Case 01-RC-101426ClosedBeverly, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 82
Included: all full time communications and network technicians at Tozier Rd in Beverly, MA Excluded: all others
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2013Case 32-CA-099235ClosedLivermore, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 209
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2013Case 32-CA-098187ClosedConcord, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50,000
COMCAST
CA
Filed 27 November 2012Case 10-CA-093781ClosedAlpharetta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 200
COMCAST
CA
Filed 5 October 2012Case 10-CA-090882ClosedAlpharetta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 June 2012Case 32-CA-082605ClosedLivermore, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 212
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 February 2012Case 32-CA-074330ClosedLivermore, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 212
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 July 2011Case 20-CA-035673ClosedSan Rafael, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 July 2011Case 13-CA-060989ClosedWoodhaven, MIRegion 13Workers in the unit 71
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 1 June 2011Case 20-RC-018356ClosedSan Rafael, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 62
All Fulfillment, Business and Network technicians and warehouse representatives. Excluded: Office clerical employees, professional employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 24 March 2011Case 22-RC-013239ClosedUnion, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 28
Inc. All full time Line Maintenance Engineers. Exc. Warehouse technicians, construction technicians, office and clerical staff, managers, guards and professional employees as defined by the NLRB.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 March 2011Case 12-CA-027077ClosedFort Myers, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 March 2011Case 22-CA-029877ClosedUnion, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 15
COMCAST
CA
Filed 22 November 2010Case 32-CA-025482ClosedSan Jose, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 November 2010Case 32-CA-025456ClosedLivermore, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2010Case 20-CA-035297ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 March 2010Case 12-CA-026666ClosedWest Palm Beach, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2009Case 07-CA-052593ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2009Case 07-CA-052592ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 23 October 2009Case 27-RC-008576ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 55
Included: All salespersons located at both addresses. Excluded: All other employees and supervisors as defined inthe Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2009Case 32-CA-024775ClosedSan Jose, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2009Case 20-CA-034654ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 95
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2009Case 32-CA-024426ClosedLivermore, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 94,551
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2009Case 32-CA-024425ClosedLivermore, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 148
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2009Case 25-CA-031003ClosedLivermore, CARegion 25Workers in the unit 94,551
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2009Case 25-CA-031002ClosedLivermore, CARegion 25Workers in the unit 148
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2008Case 32-CA-024159ClosedSan Jose, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2008Case 32-CA-023828ClosedSan Ramon, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 December 2007Case 32-CA-023666ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 July 2007Case 32-CA-023355ClosedSan Jose, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 30 March 2007Case 34-RD-000334ClosedSeymour, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 70
All full-time and regular part-time installer/repair technicians, dispatchers, lead dispatcher, technicans, head-end technicians, construction technicians, draftsmen, construction repair and warehouse one and warehouse two employees employed by the Employer; but excluding all other employees, and guards, professional employees and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2007Case 05-CA-033507ClosedFrederick, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 December 2006Case 32-CA-022987ClosedSan Ramon, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 February 2005Case 13-CA-042409ClosedOak Brook, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 February 2005Case 13-CA-042408ClosedOak Brook, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 2005Case 20-CA-032317ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 December 2004Case 20-CA-032241ClosedBurlingame, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 May 2004Case 32-CA-021362ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 80
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 1 December 2003Case 12-RD-000958ClosedHialeah, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 72
Included: BSST Field Technicians, System Technicians, Warehouse, Converter Techs, Audit Techs. Excluded: Clerical Workers, direct sales.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 June 2003Case 06-CA-033509ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 974
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 June 2003Case 06-CA-033491ClosedWashington, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 45
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 20 May 2003Case 18-RD-002460ClosedArden Hills, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 18
Inventory Control, Receiver Control Tech 1, Receiver Control Tech 2, Receiver Control Lead, Warehouse Coordinator 1, Warehouse Coordinator 2, AT& T Broadband, (Comcast), Employees, St. Paul, Brooklyn Park, and Arden Hills, Minnesota, at the following locations: 1. AT&T (Comcast) Brooklyn Park Office, 6901 Winnetka Avenue, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. 55428 2. AT&T (Comcast) Arden Hills Warehouse, 1238 Gray Fox Road, ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2003Case 06-CA-033442ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2003Case 06-CA-033441ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 120
COMCAST
CA
Filed 24 April 2003Case 13-CA-041140ClosedMorris, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 March 2003Case 06-CA-033319ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 974
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 March 2003Case 06-CA-033318ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 974

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.