Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

CVS Caremark

34 cases in this site's copy of the record · 1 of those 34 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 04, 06, 12, 13, 20, 28 · Bensenville, IL; Chicago, IL; Monroeville, PA; Redwood City, CA; Saint Petersburg, FL; San Francisco, CA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	31
RC	Petition for an election	3

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 August 2024Case 20-CA-349128ClosedRedwood City, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2021Case 20-CA-287388ClosedSan Mateo, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 20
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 30 November 2021Case 20-RC-286919ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 18
Included: All full-time and regular part-time employees in the following classifications employed by the Employer at its facility located at 499 Haight Street, San Francisco, California: store associates, pharmacy technicians, pharmacy lead technicians, store associates rx, shift supervisors, shift supervisors rx, and inventory specialists; excluding all employees not situated in CVS/pharmacy retail stores; store ...
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 4 October 2021Case 20-RC-283889ClosedSan Mateo, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 20
Full-Time and part-time beauty advisors, store associates, pharmacy technicians, pharmacy lead technicians, store associate rx, shift supervisors, shift supervisors, rx, inventory specialists, home healthcare clerks, healthcare concierge. photo lab technicians and photo lab supervisors. . Excluding supervisors and guards.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 April 2021Case 13-CA-275412ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 April 2020Case 06-CA-259497ClosedMonroeville, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 101
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 March 2020Case 13-CA-257908ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2020Case 13-CA-256648ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 February 2020Case 13-CA-255847ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2019Case 13-CA-249567ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 September 2019Case 13-CA-249076ClosedBensenville, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 July 2019Case 13-CA-244813ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 May 2019Case 13-CA-241599ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 May 2019Case 13-CA-241598ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 April 2019Case 13-CA-239824ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 April 2019Case 13-CA-239819ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 February 2019Case 13-CA-236520OpenChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 January 2019Case 13-CA-234788ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 September 2018Case 13-CA-227152ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2017Case 13-CA-202305ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 May 2017Case 13-CA-199434ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 24 April 2017Case 04-RC-197389ClosedWilkes-Barre, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 335
Included: All employees in the packing, filling, opti-tech and material handlers departments. Excluded: All maintenance, pharmacist, non-clinical diverts, rx entry, participant services, office clerical and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 September 2016Case 13-CA-183860ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 August 2016Case 13-CA-182776ClosedBensenville, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 August 2016Case 13-CA-181273ClosedBensenville, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 May 2016Case 13-CA-177290ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2016Case 06-CA-176932ClosedMonroeville, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 May 2016Case 13-CA-175841ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 May 2016Case 13-CA-175419ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 135
CVS/Caremark
CA
Filed 17 April 2015Case 01-CA-150468ClosedWoonsocket, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 July 2014Case 12-CA-133567ClosedSaint Petersburg, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 1,000
CVS/Caremark
CA
Filed 4 February 2014Case 13-CA-121899ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 163,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2012Case 28-CA-076822ClosedScottsdale, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 December 2009Case 13-CA-045734ClosedWoonsocket, RIRegion 13Workers in the unit 845

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.