Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Deco Security Services

33 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 33 are marked open by the Board · Region 05, 07, 08, 09, 13, 14, 18, 25, 27 · Baltimore, MD; CINCINNATI, OH; CLEVELAND, OH; Champlin, MN; Cincinnati, OH; Cleveland, OH and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	32
RC	Petition for an election	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 May 2018Case 27-CA-219652ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 250
DECO SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 9 January 2014Case 08-CA-120271ClosedCLEVELAND, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 250
DECO SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 22 October 2013Case 08-CA-115246ClosedCLEVELAND, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2013Case 08-CA-113331ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 250
DECO SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 9 May 2013Case 08-CA-104691ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 250
DECO SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 10 April 2013Case 09-CA-102401ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 50
DECO SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 4 March 2013Case 09-CA-099711ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 50
DECO SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 19 February 2013Case 09-CA-098686ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 2012Case 30-CA-087087ClosedChamplin, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 90
DECO SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 9 February 2012Case 25-CA-074164ClosedINDIANAPOLIS, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 200
DECO SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 3 November 2011Case 09-CA-068161ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 60
DECO Security Services
CA
Filed 2 November 2011Case 25-CA-068027ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2011Case 08-CA-067220ClosedCLEVELAND, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 August 2011Case 08-CA-063326ClosedMogadore, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 June 2011Case 25-CA-031884ClosedGreenfield, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 180
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 December 2010Case 08-CA-039280ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 100
DECO Security Services
CA
Filed 21 December 2010Case 08-CA-039278ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 75
DECO Security Services
CA
Filed 12 July 2010Case 17-CA-024896ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 14Workers in the unit 82
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2009Case 08-CA-038638ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2009Case 07-CA-052399ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 80
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 6 March 2009Case 05-RC-016294ClosedRichmond, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 165
Included: All full-time and regular part-time security officers employed by the Employer assigned to the federal buildings located in Richmond, Roanoke, Charlottesville, and outlying areas in the State of Virginia (including Norfolk) pursuant to the Employer's contract with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for the provision of security services at said facilities Excluded: All office clerical employees, ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 April 2008Case 05-CA-034278ClosedRockville, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2008Case 05-CA-034077ClosedRockville, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 150
DECO SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 29 October 2007Case 09-CA-043964ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 52
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 August 2007Case 05-CA-033794ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 August 2007Case 05-CA-033793ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2007Case 05-CA-033745ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 157
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2007Case 05-CA-033744ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 157
DECO Security Services
CA
Filed 15 May 2007Case 05-CA-033593ClosedRichmond, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 100
DECO Security Services
CA
Filed 18 April 2007Case 05-CA-033556ClosedRichmond, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 100
DECO Security Services
CA
Filed 2 March 2007Case 05-CA-033486ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 100
DECO SECURITY SERVICES
CA
Filed 27 June 2006Case 09-CA-042926ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
DECO Security Services
CA
Filed 27 September 2002Case 13-CA-040526ClosedOnamia, MNRegion 13Workers in the unit 60

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.