Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

DFW Security Protective Force

68 cases in this site's copy of the record · 1 of those 68 are marked open by the Board · Region 06, 13, 14, 16, 18 · Aurora, IL; Chicago, IL; Farmington, MN; Fort Worth, TX; Haltom City, TX; Houston, TX and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	66
RC	Petition for an election	2

The cases

Petition for an election
RC
Filed 25 February 2026Case 18-RC-381801ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 24
Included: All employees performing guard duties as defined in section 9(b)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act, employed by DFW Security Protective Force @ 512 Division Street Farmington, MN 55024 & 6311 34th S Minneapolis 55450 Excluded All office clerical employees, professional employees and supervisors defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 February 2026Case 16-CA-381735OpenRichland Hills, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 14
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 December 2025Case 16-CA-376601ClosedHaltom City, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 14
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 September 2024Case 16-CA-350911ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 September 2024Case 16-CA-350910ClosedHaltom City, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 September 2024Case 16-CA-350493ClosedHaltom City, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 September 2024Case 16-CA-350474ClosedHaltom City, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2023Case 18-CA-317293ClosedFarmington, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 March 2023Case 18-CA-315261ClosedFarmington, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 June 2022Case 13-CA-297808ClosedAurora, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 November 2021Case 16-CA-286515ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 November 2021Case 16-CA-286103ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2021Case 16-CA-285112ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2021Case 16-CA-284947ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2021Case 16-CA-284938ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2021Case 16-CA-284933ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2021Case 16-CA-284920ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 October 2021Case 16-CA-284004ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2021Case 16-CA-283900ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2021Case 16-CA-283675ClosedHaltom City, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2021Case 16-CA-283669ClosedHaltom City, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2021Case 16-CA-283658ClosedHaltom City, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 September 2021Case 16-CA-282368ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 July 2021Case 16-CA-279920ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 13
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 July 2021Case 16-CA-279736ClosedHaltom City, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 9 July 2021Case 13-RC-279684ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 38
Included: FAA Security Guards assigned to the federal buildings in the state of Illinois. Excluded: All other employees of the Employer covered by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 June 2021Case 16-CA-278924ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 June 2021Case 16-CA-278827ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2021Case 16-CA-277063ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2021Case 16-CA-276407ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 April 2021Case 16-CA-276007ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
DFW SECURITY PROTECTIVE FORCE
CA
Filed 21 April 2021Case 16-CA-275980ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 April 2021Case 16-CA-275795ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 April 2021Case 18-CA-275770ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 25
DFW SECURITY PROTECTIVE FORCE
CA
Filed 14 April 2021Case 16-CA-275635ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2021Case 16-CA-274576ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2021Case 16-CA-274564ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 September 2020Case 16-CA-266584ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 7
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2020Case 16-CA-265915ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 August 2020Case 16-CA-264521ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 July 2020Case 18-CA-263848ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 January 2020Case 18-CA-254819ClosedFarmington, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 9
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 September 2019Case 13-CA-248729ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2019Case 06-CA-246603ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 July 2019Case 16-CA-244306ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 May 2019Case 16-CA-242446ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 April 2019Case 06-CA-239547ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2019Case 16-CA-237132ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 32
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2019Case 16-CA-237100ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 32
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2019Case 16-CA-235284ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2018Case 16-CA-230343ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 October 2018Case 16-CA-228735ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 August 2018Case 16-CA-226598ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 August 2018Case 16-CA-225162ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 December 2017Case 16-CA-212158ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 November 2017Case 06-CA-210584ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 13
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 November 2017Case 06-CA-210583ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 13
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 November 2017Case 06-CA-210570ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 13
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 November 2017Case 06-CA-210518ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 13
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 August 2017Case 06-CA-204720ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2017Case 14-CA-195393ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 January 2017Case 14-CA-191177ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 54
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 September 2016Case 14-CA-184549ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 September 2016Case 14-CA-183543ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 54
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 July 2016Case 14-CA-180205ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 June 2016Case 14-CA-178815ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 54
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 May 2016Case 14-CA-177071ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 54
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 May 2016Case 14-CA-177024ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 54

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.