Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

DHL Express

135 cases in this site's copy of the record · 6 of those 135 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 12, 13, 14, 16, 19, 20, 22, 29, 31, 32 · Alsip, IL; Avalon, PA; Boston, MA; Breinigsville, PA; Bridgeton, MO; Carrollton, TX and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	129
RC	Petition for an election	6

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 August 2026Case 02-CA-393073OpenMount Vernon, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 45
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 14 July 2026Case 09-CA-390978OpenErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 8 June 2026Case 09-CA-388716OpenErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 August 2025Case 14-CA-372028ClosedHazelwood, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 36
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 25 August 2025Case 09-CA-372076ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 1,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 2025Case 14-CA-371896OpenHazelwood, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 36
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 7 July 2025Case 09-CA-368940OpenErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2025Case 19-CA-368418OpenSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 July 2024Case 31-CA-346066ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2024Case 06-CA-341089ClosedAvalon, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 38
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 March 2024Case 31-CA-337653ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 5 February 2024Case 09-CA-335211ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 5 February 2024Case 09-CA-335182ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2024Case 31-CA-334226ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 20 December 2023Case 09-CA-332470ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 December 2023Case 19-CA-332026ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 December 2023Case 32-CA-332226ClosedFremont, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2023Case 31-CA-332066ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 15 December 2023Case 09-CA-332025ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 14 December 2023Case 09-CA-332252ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 December 2023Case 04-CA-331860ClosedSharon Hill, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 3,000
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 12 December 2023Case 09-CA-331978ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 12 December 2023Case 09-CA-331977ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 40
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 11 December 2023Case 09-CA-331651ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 8 December 2023Case 09-CA-331852ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 8 December 2023Case 09-CA-331663ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 8 December 2023Case 09-CA-331656ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2023Case 31-CA-331521ClosedRedondo Beach, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2023Case 16-CA-331284ClosedCarrollton, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 20
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 1 December 2023Case 09-CA-331235ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 17 October 2023Case 09-CA-328227ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 29 August 2023Case 09-CA-325423ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 June 2023Case 19-CA-320253ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 70
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 May 2023Case 08-CA-317282ClosedMiddleburg Heights, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 50
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 18 April 2023Case 09-CA-316500ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 18 April 2023Case 09-CA-316493ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 18 April 2023Case 09-CA-316482ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 March 2023Case 04-CA-314744ClosedSharon Hill, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 1
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 23 March 2023Case 09-CA-314887ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 20 December 2022Case 09-CA-309426ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 20 December 2022Case 09-CA-309413ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 20 December 2022Case 09-CA-309407ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 20 December 2022Case 09-CA-309401ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 20 December 2022Case 09-CA-309382ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 20 December 2022Case 09-CA-309376ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 14 October 2022Case 09-CA-305474ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 7 October 2022Case 09-CA-304942ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 3 October 2022Case 09-CA-304522ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 28 September 2022Case 09-CA-304300ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 20 September 2022Case 09-CA-303861ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 8 September 2022Case 09-CA-302960ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 September 2022Case 12-CA-302659ClosedDoral, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 41
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 1 September 2022Case 09-CA-302608ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 1 September 2022Case 09-CA-302576ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 30 August 2022Case 09-CA-302441ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 24 August 2022Case 09-CA-302072ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 August 2022Case 01-CA-300555ClosedWestborough, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 150
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 21 January 2022Case 01-CA-289306ClosedSouth Boston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 9 December 2020Case 01-CA-270072ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 4 December 2020Case 01-CA-269721ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 January 2020Case 22-CA-254430ClosedElizabeth, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 December 2019Case 07-CA-252925ClosedRomulus, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 120
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 10 July 2019Case 19-RC-244651ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 11
Included: All full-time and part-time operational supplement agents (Office Clerical) located at SeaTac and Seattle. Excluded: All other employees, guards and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 January 2019Case 20-CA-234926ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 31 October 2018Case 12-CA-230257ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 27 September 2018Case 05-RC-228241ClosedHanover, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 3
All full-time and regular part-time service agents, but excluding; all other employees, managers, guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 September 2018Case 01-CA-227869ClosedPawtucket, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 3
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 9 February 2018Case 01-RC-214554ClosedPawtucket, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 3
Included: All full time and regular part-time operation agents employed by the employer at its Pawtucket, RI location. Excluded: All other employees, guards and supervisors as defined In the National Labor Relations Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 January 2017Case 12-CA-192007ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 December 2016Case 12-CA-189742ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2016Case 12-CA-186337ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2015Case 12-CA-163263ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2015Case 12-CA-162873ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 October 2015Case 12-CA-162771ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 June 2015Case 12-CA-154565ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2014Case 12-CA-139705ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 December 2013Case 06-CA-118838ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2013Case 12-CA-097873ClosedMIAMI, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 December 2012Case 12-CA-095094ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
DHL EXPRESS
CA
Filed 9 October 2012Case 06-CA-090847ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2011Case 06-CA-066890ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2011Case 06-CA-060709ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2011Case 01-CA-046825ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 February 2011Case 12-CA-027055ClosedDoral, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 February 2011Case 12-CA-027054ClosedDoral, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2009Case 06-CA-036499ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2009Case 06-CA-036480ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 April 2009Case 08-CA-038246ClosedStrongsville, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2009Case 13-CA-045127ClosedBridgeton, MORegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2009Case 13-CA-045126ClosedBridgeton, MORegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2009Case 13-CA-045125ClosedBridgeton, MORegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2009Case 13-CA-045124ClosedBridgeton, MORegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2009Case 13-CA-045123ClosedBridgeton, MORegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2009Case 13-CA-045122ClosedBridgeton, MORegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2008Case 13-CA-045018ClosedBridgeton, MORegion 13Workers in the unit 850
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 October 2008Case 22-CA-028597ClosedEast Windsor, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 77
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2008Case 04-CA-036380ClosedBreinigsville, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2008Case 04-CA-036361ClosedBreinigsville, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2008Case 04-CA-036356ClosedBreinigsville, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 August 2008Case 13-CA-044883ClosedBridgeton, MORegion 13Workers in the unit 850
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 August 2008Case 13-CA-044882ClosedLake Forest, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 850
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2008Case 34-CA-011994ClosedWallingford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 February 2008Case 13-CA-044563ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 January 2008Case 29-CA-028709ClosedInwood, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 190
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 January 2008Case 22-CA-028186ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2007Case 13-CA-044376ClosedAlsip, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 November 2007Case 06-CA-035820ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 189
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2007Case 06-CA-035757ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 185
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2007Case 06-CA-035749ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 185
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 September 2007Case 32-CA-023526ClosedDublin, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 70
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 30 July 2007Case 04-RC-021327ClosedBreinigsville, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 400
All permanent full time and part time workers employed at the facility.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 June 2007Case 29-CA-028368ClosedJamaica, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 May 2007Case 06-CA-035592ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 189
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 March 2007Case 06-CA-035530ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2007Case 05-CA-033489ClosedVirginia Beach, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2007Case 06-CA-035491ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2007Case 06-CA-035471ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2007Case 06-CA-035469ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 189
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 November 2006Case 02-CA-037999ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
DHL EXPRESS
RC
Filed 29 September 2006Case 09-RC-018106ClosedWilmington, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 350
INCLUDED: All permanent full time and part time workers employed at the Wilmington, Ohio ILN Gateway EXCLUDED: All other employees including but not limited to, temporary, casual, seasonal, maintenance, guards, and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2006Case 13-CA-043579ClosedLake Forest, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 August 2006Case 13-CA-043576ClosedLake Forest, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 850
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 August 2006Case 05-CA-033215ClosedLinthicum, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2006Case 12-CA-025035ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 May 2006Case 06-CA-035169ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 189
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 April 2006Case 13-CA-043308ClosedLake Forest, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 850
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 February 2006Case 13-CA-043197ClosedFranklin Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2006Case 13-CA-043164ClosedLake Forest, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 850
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 January 2006Case 13-CA-043132ClosedLake Forest, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 August 2005Case 13-CA-042861ClosedLake Forest, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 850
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 June 2005Case 13-CA-042686ClosedLake Forest, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 850
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2005Case 13-CA-042413ClosedLisle, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2004Case 06-CA-034283ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 180
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 April 2004Case 06-CA-034055ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 30
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 22 September 2003Case 13-RC-021054ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 161

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.