Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

67 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 67 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 03, 07 · BUCHANAN, NY; Buchanan, NY; Covert, MI; Oswego, NY; PLYMOUTH, MA; Plymouth, MA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	61
RC	Petition for an election	3
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	3

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 July 2019Case 07-CA-244436ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 650
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 June 2019Case 07-CA-242994ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 110
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 January 2018Case 02-CA-213442ClosedBuchanan, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 350
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS INC.
CA
Filed 17 August 2016Case 01-CA-182426ClosedPLYMOUTH, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS INC
CA
Filed 12 August 2016Case 01-CA-182145ClosedPLYMOUTH, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2016Case 07-CA-178388ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS INC.
CA
Filed 12 April 2016Case 01-CA-173864ClosedPLYMOUTH, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 20 January 2016Case 01-CA-168103ClosedPLYMOUTH, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 3 December 2015Case 01-CA-165432ClosedPLYMOUTH, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 23 November 2015Case 01-CA-164815ClosedPLYMOUTH, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 23 November 2015Case 01-CA-164729ClosedPLYMOUTH, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 15 October 2015Case 01-CA-161935ClosedPLYMOUTH, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2015Case 02-CA-161809ClosedWhite Plains, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2015Case 02-CA-161790ClosedWhite Plains, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 200
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS INC.
CA
Filed 27 August 2015Case 01-CA-158947ClosedPLYMOUTH, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 August 2015Case 07-CA-158484ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2015Case 07-CA-158034ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 30 June 2015Case 03-RC-155136ClosedOswego, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 25
Included: all hourly full time and part time, armed Security Shift Supervisors employed by the employer at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. Excluded: all part time and full time armed and unarmed security officers, clerical, administrative, professional and salaried supervisory employees as defined by the National Labor Relations Act.
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 2 September 2014Case 01-CA-135824ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS INC.
CA
Filed 28 July 2014Case 01-CA-133594ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 50
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 10 June 2014Case 01-CA-130501ClosedPLYMOUTH, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 350
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 6 January 2014Case 01-CA-120047ClosedPLYMOUTH, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 December 2013Case 07-CA-118806ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2013Case 07-CA-105436ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 15 April 2013Case 01-CA-102860ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2013Case 07-CA-099253ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2013Case 07-CA-096720ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 January 2013Case 07-CA-095945ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 January 2013Case 07-CA-095941ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 250
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 9 October 2012Case 02-CA-090887ClosedBUCHANAN, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 390
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2012Case 01-CA-085812ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 July 2012Case 01-CA-085349ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 July 2012Case 01-CA-085316ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 June 2012Case 01-CA-082658ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 350
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 10 May 2012Case 01-CA-080772ClosedPLYMOUTH, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 400
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC
CA
Filed 12 March 2012Case 02-CA-076381ClosedBUCHANAN, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 February 2012Case 07-CA-074832ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 February 2012Case 07-CA-073639ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 2
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 1 February 2012Case 07-UC-073591ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2012Case 07-CA-073600ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 2
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 30 January 2012Case 01-CA-073431ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 November 2011Case 01-CA-069875ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 350
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 22 November 2011Case 01-CA-069362ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 350
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 22 September 2011Case 01-CA-065184ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 22 September 2011Case 01-CA-065127ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
CA
Filed 8 July 2011Case 02-CA-060994ClosedBuchanan, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 450
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 15 March 2011Case 07-RC-023416ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 57
Included: full-time and regular part-time Technicians employed by the Employer at its Palisades Plant. Excluded: All exempt employees, all other non-exempt employees, all operating, meaintenance and construction employees, guards and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2010Case 01-CA-046406ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2010Case 01-CA-046405ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2010Case 07-CA-053155ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 95
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 February 2010Case 01-CA-045966ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 2010Case 07-CA-052642ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 110
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 December 2008Case 07-CA-051715ClosedSouth Haven, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 51
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 November 2008Case 02-CA-039036ClosedBuchanan, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 850
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2008Case 01-CA-044764ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 May 2008Case 01-CA-044645ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 May 2008Case 01-CA-044627ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 260
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 25 April 2008Case 01-UC-000867ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 249
All job titles listed on Schedule A of the current collective bargaining agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Exhibit 2 lists those positions sought to be excluded from the unit.
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 13 March 2008Case 01-UC-000866ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 147
Included: All job titles in Schedule A of the current collective bargaining agreement attached hereto as Exhi bit I, Exhi bit 2 lists those positions sought to be excluded from the unit Excluded: All guards and supervisors as defined in the National Labor Relations Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 March 2008Case 01-CA-044519ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 October 2007Case 01-CA-044236ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 260
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 October 2007Case 01-CA-044217ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 260
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2007Case 01-CA-044210ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 260
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 June 2007Case 01-CA-043980ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 260
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 21 May 2007Case 07-RC-023109ClosedCovert, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 51
Included: All Technical employees (non-exempt) Chemistry, Radiation Protection, Instrument & Control, All Lead Technicians, Drafters & Quality Control Inspectors. Excluded: All exempt employees, all other non-exempt employees, all operating, maintenance, and construction employees, guards and supervisors, as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 March 2007Case 01-CA-043848ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2007Case 01-CA-043838ClosedPlymouth, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 260

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.