Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Ford Motor Company

407 cases in this site's copy of the record · 46 of those 407 are marked open by the Board · Region 03, 05, 07, 08, 09, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 22, 25, 27, 28, 31 · AVON LAKE, OH; Allen Park, MI; Avon Lake, OH; Avon, OH; BROOK PARK, OH; Batavia, OH and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	398
CB	Charge against a union	1
RC	Petition for an election	4
RD	Petition to decertify	3
RM	Petition filed by an employer	1

The cases

Page 3 of 3, newest first: 1 2 3

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2011Case 08-CA-039330ClosedLima, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 September 2010Case 07-CA-053140ClosedSterling Heights, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 2010Case 08-CA-039088ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 August 2010Case 31-CA-029870ClosedRancho Cucamonga, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 August 2010Case 10-CA-038513ClosedMcDonough, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 May 2010Case 16-CA-027440ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 May 2010Case 16-CA-027427ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 33
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 February 2010Case 08-CA-038814ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 February 2010Case 08-CA-038783ClosedWalton Hills, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 380
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2010Case 03-CA-027514ClosedBlasdell, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 2010Case 16-CA-027242ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 33
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 January 2010Case 08-CA-038740ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2009Case 08-CA-038703ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 September 2009Case 16-CA-026996ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 June 2009Case 10-CA-037942ClosedMcDonough, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2009Case 16-CA-026803ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2009Case 16-CA-026782ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 42
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2009Case 13-CA-045294ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 44
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 May 2009Case 31-CA-029242ClosedRancho Cucamonga, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 April 2009Case 31-CA-029194ClosedRancho Cucamonga, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 April 2009Case 26-CA-023401ClosedRancho Cucamonga, CARegion 15Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 April 2009Case 09-CA-044896ClosedSharonville, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 April 2009Case 08-CA-038250ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2009Case 16-CA-026658ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 38
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 March 2009Case 08-CA-038221ClosedWalton Hills, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2009Case 08-CA-038200ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2009Case 07-CA-051812ClosedWayne, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 February 2009Case 17-CA-024403ClosedKansas City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2009Case 08-CA-038115ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 374
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 December 2008Case 17-CA-024372ClosedClaycomo, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 October 2008Case 07-CA-051548ClosedFlat Rock, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 3,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 August 2008Case 08-CA-037905ClosedAvon Lake, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 August 2008Case 09-CA-044516ClosedSharonville, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 May 2008Case 26-CA-023051ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 170
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 April 2008Case 13-CA-044670ClosedChicago Heights, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 April 2008Case 05-CA-034245ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2008Case 28-CA-021861ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 April 2008Case 08-CA-037705ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 March 2008Case 10-CA-037295ClosedHapeville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 2,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 March 2008Case 05-CA-034178ClosedNorfolk, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2008Case 08-CA-037626ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2008Case 08-CA-037583ClosedWalton Hills, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 December 2007Case 08-CA-037549ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 November 2007Case 03-CA-026500ClosedBuffalo, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 October 2007Case 13-CA-044314ClosedChicago Heights, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 950
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 October 2007Case 08-CA-037430ClosedAvon Lake, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 September 2007Case 26-CA-022868ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 176
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 2007Case 08-CA-037358ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 February 2007Case 07-CA-050177ClosedDearborn, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 February 2007Case 10-CA-036685ClosedMcDonough, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 91
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2007Case 08-CA-037020ClosedAvon Lake, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 January 2007Case 08-CA-037003ClosedAvon Lake, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 January 2007Case 08-CA-037002ClosedAvon Lake, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2007Case 08-CA-036986ClosedAvon Lake, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2006Case 08-CA-036849ClosedAvon Lake, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2006Case 08-CA-036796ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 July 2006Case 10-CA-036346ClosedHapeville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 2,000
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
CA
Filed 8 May 2006Case 09-CA-042829ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 February 2006Case 08-CA-036382ClosedAvon Lake, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 December 2005Case 08-CA-036292ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 5,000
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
CA
Filed 12 December 2005Case 25-CA-029821ClosedPRINCETON, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 53
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
CA
Filed 12 December 2005Case 25-CA-029820ClosedPRINCETON, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 53
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
CA
Filed 12 December 2005Case 25-CA-029819ClosedPRINCETON, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 53
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2005Case 08-CA-036193ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 October 2005Case 08-CA-036149ClosedLorain, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2005Case 26-CA-022239ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 180
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 12 September 2005Case 07-RD-003493ClosedAllen Park, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 185
Included: All U.S. based full-time and regular part-time engineers solely employed by Ford Motor Company in the Body Construction Engineering organization within Vehicle Operations Manufacturing Engineering, as certified by the Board in Case 7-RC-22764. Excluded: Managerial employees, confidential employees, guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act, and all other employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 2005Case 05-CA-032631ClosedWinchester, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 July 2005Case 07-CA-048767ClosedAllen Park, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 183
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 June 2005Case 08-CA-035887ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2005Case 07-CA-048622ClosedDearborn, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 May 2005Case 03-CA-025394ClosedBuffalo, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2005Case 09-CA-041921ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2005Case 08-CA-035761ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2005Case 10-CA-035570ClosedHapeville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 2,000
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
CA
Filed 4 April 2005Case 25-CA-029549ClosedPRINCETON, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 March 2005Case 08-CA-035681ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 February 2005Case 08-CA-035631ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 February 2005Case 07-CA-048345ClosedDearborn, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 February 2005Case 03-CA-025264ClosedBlasdell, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2005Case 16-CA-024106ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 78
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 January 2005Case 08-CA-035595ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 4,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 October 2004Case 10-CA-035256ClosedHapeville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 October 2004Case 08-CA-035337ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2004Case 17-CA-022871ClosedKansas City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 August 2004Case 08-CA-035218ClosedAvon Lake, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 June 2004Case 13-CA-041948ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 110
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 May 2004Case 26-CA-021693ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 230
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 2004Case 10-CA-034930ClosedHapeville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2004Case 13-CA-041745ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 2,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2004Case 13-CA-041689ClosedChicago Heights, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 56
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
CA
Filed 30 September 2003Case 09-CA-040583ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 6,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 August 2003Case 13-CA-041241ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 June 2003Case 13-CA-041135ClosedMelrose Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 165
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 2003Case 07-CA-045799ClosedWixom, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 October 2002Case 13-CA-040606ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 2001Case 17-CA-021135ClosedClaycomo, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 50
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
CA
Filed 6 November 2000Case 09-CA-038050ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2000Case 10-CA-032733ClosedHapeville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 2,800
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
CA
Filed 25 October 2000Case 09-CA-038014ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 August 2000Case 10-CA-032600ClosedHapeville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 2,000
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
CA
Filed 12 May 2000Case 09-CA-037650ClosedBatavia, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 900
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
CA
Filed 8 March 2000Case 09-CA-037464ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 6,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 February 2000Case 18-CA-015534ClosedSaint Paul, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,870
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 January 2000Case 08-CA-031280ClosedBrook Park, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 February 1998Case 13-CA-036804ClosedMelrose Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 220
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 1997Case 07-CA-040374ClosedRaisinville, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 1

Page 3 of 3, newest first: 1 2 3

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.