Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Four Points by Sheraton

7 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 7 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 04, 31, 32 · Los Angeles, CA; Philadelphia, PA; San Jose, CA; Santa Monica, CA; Waterbury, CT

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	4
RD	Petition to decertify	2
RM	Petition filed by an employer	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 August 2012Case 32-CA-088361ClosedSan Jose, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 December 2011Case 32-CA-071562ClosedSan Jose, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 40
Petition filed by an employer
RM
Filed 1 October 2009Case 04-RM-001283ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 28
All employees in the Housekeeping and Maintenance departments.
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 29 February 2008Case 31-RD-001580ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 168
Included: All regular Full-time and regular part-time hotel service, housekeeping, food and beverage and laundry employees (including room cleaners, houseperson bell person, telephone operators, kitchen, employees, servers, busers, bartenders, cashiers, host, concierges, laundry workers, front desk, recreational, parking and shuttle van employees) employed by the employer at the hotel but Excluded: excluding all ...
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 19 October 2007Case 31-RD-001575ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 168
Included: All regular Full-time and regular part-time hotel service, housekeeping, food and beverage and laundry employees (including room cleaners, houseperson bell person, telephone operators, kitchen, employees, servers, busers, bartenders, cashiers, host, concierges, laundry workers, front desk, recreational, parking and shuttle van employees) employed by the employer at the hotel but Excluded: excluding all ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2003Case 31-CA-026588ClosedSanta Monica, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 106
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 1997Case 34-CA-007879ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.