Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

General Electric Company

60 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 60 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 03, 06, 08, 09, 10, 12, 14, 19, 25, 28 · Albuquerque, NM; Cincinnati, OH; Cleveland, OH; East Cleveland, OH; East Hartford, CT; Erie, PA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	56
RC	Petition for an election	3
RD	Petition to decertify	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 July 2023Case 01-CA-322217ClosedLynn, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 2,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 November 2022Case 10-CA-307979ClosedMadisonville, KYRegion 10Workers in the unit 450
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
CA
Filed 27 May 2022Case 01-CA-296678ClosedLynn, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 2,400
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
CA
Filed 2 March 2022Case 01-CA-291655ClosedLynn, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 56,000
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
RC
Filed 1 March 2022Case 09-RC-291478ClosedPeebles, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 280
Employees Included All full-time and Part-time Employees of the Employer including all Data acquisition technicians, Engineering Test technicians, Control Console technicians and EHS assistant 7. Employees Excluded All office clerical employees, all professional employees, all other employees, guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
CA
Filed 15 February 2022Case 09-CA-290696ClosedPeebles, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 October 2021Case 01-CA-284801ClosedLynn, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 560,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 September 2017Case 06-CA-206394ClosedErie, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1,700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 September 2017Case 06-CA-206252ClosedErie, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 9
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 September 2017Case 06-CA-205651ClosedErie, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1,700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 February 2017Case 06-CA-193285ClosedGrove City, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2017Case 06-CA-191709ClosedErie, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1,700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 December 2016Case 06-CA-190010ClosedErie, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1,700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 November 2016Case 06-CA-188585ClosedErie, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1,700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2016Case 06-CA-183315ClosedErie, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1,700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 July 2016Case 06-CA-180016ClosedGrove City, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1,007
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 May 2016Case 06-CA-176011ClosedGrove City, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1,007
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 April 2016Case 06-CA-174812ClosedErie, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1,700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 April 2015Case 08-CA-150049ClosedEuclid, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 60
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
CA
Filed 17 February 2015Case 09-CA-146534ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 November 2014Case 06-CA-140393ClosedGrove City, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 October 2014Case 06-CA-138426ClosedGrove City, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 April 2014Case 10-CA-126879ClosedMadisonville, KYRegion 10Workers in the unit 545
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 October 2013Case 03-CA-114785ClosedFairfield, CTRegion 03Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2013Case 06-CA-114702ClosedErie, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 3,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2013Case 06-CA-114700ClosedErie, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 3,500
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
CA
Filed 10 September 2013Case 01-CA-113118ClosedEast Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 25
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
CA
Filed 21 August 2013Case 09-CA-111779ClosedLOUISVILLE, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 100,000
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
CA
Filed 21 August 2013Case 09-CA-111761ClosedLOUISVILLE, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 100,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 June 2013Case 06-CA-107214ClosedErie, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 3,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 May 2013Case 06-CA-104777ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 3,500
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
CA
Filed 7 December 2012Case 09-CA-094529ClosedLOUISVILLE, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2012Case 25-CA-087135ClosedWest Burlington, IARegion 25Workers in the unit 170
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
CA
Filed 15 June 2012Case 09-CA-083254ClosedLOUISVILLE, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 100,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2012Case 25-CA-081035ClosedWest Burlington, IARegion 25Workers in the unit 17
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2012Case 25-CA-081025ClosedWest Burlington, IARegion 25Workers in the unit 170
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2012Case 25-CA-081023ClosedWest Burlington, IARegion 25Workers in the unit 170
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2012Case 25-CA-080079ClosedWest Burlington, IARegion 25Workers in the unit 170
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 3 February 2012Case 14-RC-073765ClosedWest Burlington, IARegion 14Workers in the unit 153
Included: All full-time and regular part-time production and maintenance employees at the employer's West Burlington, Iowa facility. Excluded: All others, including but not limited to Buyers, Designers, Engineers, Office Clerical, Production Leaders and Supervisors, Managerial Executives, Confidential employees, Craft Employees, and Guards as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 December 2010Case 08-CA-039250ClosedEast Cleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 June 2010Case 01-CA-046180ClosedLynn, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 May 2010Case 08-CA-038935ClosedEast Cleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2009Case 09-CA-045196ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 March 2009Case 28-CA-022380ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 360
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 December 2008Case 06-CA-036294ClosedErie, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 December 2008Case 06-CA-036291ClosedErie, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 November 2008Case 28-CA-022248ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 360
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 29 July 2008Case 36-RD-001710ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 6
Hourly service personnel in the greater metro Portland/Vancouver area; excluding mangers, dispatchers, HR reps, and all other employees not working the Portland/Vancouver area.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2008Case 28-CA-021999ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2008Case 28-CA-021793ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 375
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 November 2007Case 28-CA-021675ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 600
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 4 April 2007Case 12-RC-009248ClosedMarietta, GARegion 12Workers in the unit 15
Included: All service technicians at the employer's Daytona Beach, Florida facilities. Excluded: All other employees of the employer, including office clerical, guards, and supervisors, as defined in the Act, as amended.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2005Case 08-CA-036163ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 May 2003Case 11-CA-019955ClosedSalem, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 April 2002Case 06-CA-032699ClosedErie, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 August 2001Case 28-CA-017403ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 670
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2001Case 28-CA-017370ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 670
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
CA
Filed 5 July 2001Case 09-CA-038591ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 6,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 June 1999Case 01-CA-037311ClosedLynn, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 January 1994Case 06-CA-026117ClosedWashington, WVRegion 06Workers in the unit 600

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.