Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Guardsmark

10 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 10 are marked open by the Board · Region 03, 07, 09, 13, 19, 20, 32 · Buffalo, NY; Cincinnati, OH; Livonia, MI; Oak Brook, IL; Oakland, CA; Redmond, WA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	6
RC	Petition for an election	3
UD	Petition on union security	1

The cases

Petition for an election
RC
Filed 9 June 2011Case 07-RC-060256ClosedLivonia, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 6
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 12 February 2009Case 07-RC-023252ClosedRoseville, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 15
Included: All full time and or reg. part time armed & unrmed security officers performing guard duties as defined the Section 9(b)(3) of the Act. employed by Guardsmark $41111 18 l/2 Mile Rd. Sterling Hts. MI Ford trans plant Excluded: All office clerical emp. prof. emp. supervisors as defined in the act & all other emp.
GUARDSMARK
CA
Filed 5 November 2007Case 09-CA-043969ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2007Case 32-CA-023128ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 10,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 4 December 2006Case 03-RC-011739ClosedBuffalo, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 17
All security guards. Excluded: Supervisors as defined in section 2 (11) of the National Labor Relations Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2006Case 32-CA-022895ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 November 2003Case 20-CA-031573ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2003Case 20-CA-031495ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Petition on union security
UD
Filed 17 June 2003Case 13-UD-000468ClosedOak Brook, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2000Case 19-CA-026995ClosedRedmond, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.