Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Interstate Brands Corporation

105 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 105 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 03, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 27, 29, 31 · Biddeford, ME; Bidderford, ME; Billings, MT; Boonville, MO; COLUMBUS, OH; Cincinnati, OH and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	92
RC	Petition for an election	11
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	2

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 2012Case 21-CA-077839ClosedIrvine, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 November 2011Case 19-CA-068750ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 October 2011Case 27-CA-067085ClosedSalt Lake City, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 400
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 8 September 2011Case 09-CA-064190ClosedCOLUMBUS, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 April 2011Case 14-CA-030352ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 July 2010Case 19-CA-032619ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2010Case 19-CA-032583ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2010Case 31-CA-029731ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 May 2010Case 19-CA-032529ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 12
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 24 August 2009Case 25-CA-031106ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 500
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 11 August 2009Case 17-RC-012628ClosedEmporia, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 11
Included: All full-time and regular part-time mechanics and hostlers employed at the employer's facility at 1525 Industrial Road, Emporia, KS. Excluded: Production employees, road drivers, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act and all other employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2009Case 08-CA-038405ClosedNorthwood, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 May 2009Case 12-CA-026333ClosedOrlando, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2009Case 01-CA-045374ClosedBiddeford, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 340
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 22 April 2009Case 17-RC-012615ClosedIndependence, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 3
Included: All full time and regular part time lead clerks and clerks employed by the Employer at its 1431 Noland Road location Excluded: all guards and supervisors as defined in the Act and all other employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2009Case 14-CA-029662ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 325
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2009Case 14-CA-029661ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 22,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 January 2009Case 12-CA-026151ClosedOrlando, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 9 January 2009Case 25-CA-030928ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 100
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 22 December 2008Case 25-CA-030923ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2008Case 10-CA-037666ClosedKnoxville, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 125
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 November 2008Case 11-CA-022121ClosedRocky Mount, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 September 2008Case 01-CA-044936ClosedBiddeford, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 350
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 12 August 2008Case 25-CA-030776ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 16
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 August 2008Case 05-CA-034437ClosedRichmond, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 July 2008Case 11-CA-021999ClosedRocky Mount, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 June 2008Case 11-CA-021978ClosedRocky Mount, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 June 2008Case 14-CA-029385ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 June 2008Case 26-CA-023084ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 May 2008Case 26-CA-023072ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 300
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 29 May 2008Case 25-CA-030712ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 300
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 14 May 2008Case 25-CA-030687ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 16
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 May 2008Case 19-CA-031355ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2008Case 01-CA-044620ClosedBiddeford, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 400
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 25 April 2008Case 14-RC-012706ClosedSaint Clair, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 3
INCLUDED: All full-time and regular part-time clerks employed by the Employer at its St. Clair, Missouri facility EXCLUDED: drivers, salesman, office clerical and professional employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act and all other employees
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 8 April 2008Case 25-CA-030654ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 16
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2008Case 26-CA-023021ClosedMayfield, KYRegion 15Workers in the unit 13
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 March 2008Case 05-CA-034179ClosedPortsmouth, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 February 2008Case 19-CA-031223ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 15 October 2007Case 27-UC-000224ClosedBillings, MTRegion 27Workers in the unit 11
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 September 2007Case 01-CA-044203ClosedBiddeford, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2007Case 01-CA-044198ClosedBiddeford, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 September 2007Case 19-CA-031056ClosedSpokane, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2007Case 19-CA-031054ClosedTukwila, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 September 2007Case 27-CA-020627ClosedBillings, MTRegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 4 September 2007Case 05-RC-016143ClosedRichmond, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 6
Included: Route Sales Drivers Excluded: Supervision
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 27 August 2007Case 25-CA-030440ClosedWindfall, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 200
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 22 August 2007Case 25-CA-030434ClosedColumbus, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 300
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 10 August 2007Case 25-CA-030413ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 46,219
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 25 July 2007Case 18-RC-017520ClosedIowa City, IARegion 18Workers in the unit 3
Included: All full-time and regular part-time lead clerks, clerks, stock employees employed at the employer's Thrift store located 23 Gateway One Center Plaza, Iowa City, Iowa Excluded: Guards, supervisors, and management as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2007Case 01-CA-044059ClosedBiddeford, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 July 2007Case 27-CA-020544ClosedSalt Lake City, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2007Case 01-CA-044042ClosedBiddeford, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 July 2007Case 27-CA-020539ClosedSalt Lake City, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 July 2007Case 27-CA-020538ClosedSalt Lake City, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 July 2007Case 01-CA-044027ClosedBiddeford, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 June 2007Case 21-CA-037857ClosedPomona, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 650
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2007Case 01-CA-043984ClosedBiddeford, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 June 2007Case 01-CA-043979ClosedBiddeford, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2007Case 21-CA-037792ClosedPomona, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 650
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2007Case 21-CA-037791ClosedPomona, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 650
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 April 2007Case 14-CA-028955ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 301
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 April 2007Case 01-CA-043879ClosedBiddeford, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 April 2007Case 03-CA-026249ClosedRochester, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2007Case 27-CA-020433ClosedSalt Lake City, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 March 2007Case 26-CA-022702ClosedMayfield, KYRegion 15Workers in the unit 13
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2007Case 27-CA-020418ClosedSalt Lake City, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2007Case 08-CA-037023ClosedNorthwood, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2007Case 26-CA-022655ClosedMayfield, KYRegion 15Workers in the unit 13
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2007Case 26-CA-022654ClosedMayfield, KYRegion 15Workers in the unit 13
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2007Case 11-CA-021443ClosedRocky Mount, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 10
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 20 December 2006Case 25-CA-030199ClosedColumbus, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2006Case 27-CA-020315ClosedSalt Lake City, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 5 December 2006Case 05-RC-016062ClosedRichmond, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 7
Included: All Full and Part-time lead clerks, store clerks, and loaders Excluded: All guards and supervisors
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 October 2006Case 01-CA-043499ClosedBiddeford, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2006Case 03-CA-025992ClosedUtica, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 July 2006Case 27-CA-020138ClosedSalt Lake City, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2006Case 14-CA-028691ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 301
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2006Case 20-CA-032866ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2005Case 01-CA-042876ClosedBiddeford, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 August 2004Case 21-CA-036469ClosedPomona, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 2,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 7 July 2004Case 06-RC-012361ClosedNutter Fort, WVRegion 06Workers in the unit 3
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 July 2004Case 01-CA-041905ClosedBidderford, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2004Case 17-CA-022597ClosedTulsa, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 December 2003Case 17-CA-022544ClosedSpringfield, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 235
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2003Case 17-CA-022529ClosedSpringfield, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 235
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2003Case 17-CA-022528ClosedBoonville, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 235
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 28 April 2003Case 12-UC-000153ClosedOrlando, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 405
Existing: Separate units of (1) Merita Inside Plant employees, (2) Wonder Sales employees, and (3) Wonder Thrift Stores employees. Proposed: All Merita Inside Plant employees, including floormen, mixers, oven operators, divider operators, wrapping, loader & dumper employees, breakmen, lidmen, roll pan stackers, moulders, helpers, shipping clerks, shipping helpers, sanitors and thrift store clerks, and lead thrift ...
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 19 March 2003Case 30-RC-006530ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 17
Included: All full-time and regular part-time employees of the employer. Excluded: All office clerical, Guards, and Supervisors as Defined in the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 27 December 2002Case 13-RC-020928ClosedHodgkins, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2002Case 13-CA-040536ClosedSchiller Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2002Case 13-CA-040533ClosedHodgkins, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 500
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 26 September 2002Case 06-RC-012137ClosedWellsburg, WVRegion 06Workers in the unit 3
All full-time and regular part-time thrift store sales clerks and lead thrift store sales clerks employed by the Employer at its Wellsburg, West Virginia, facility; excluding, office clerical employees and guards, professional employees and supervisors as defined in the Act.
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 19 August 2002Case 09-CA-039534ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 154
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 June 2002Case 26-CA-020781ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 March 2002Case 17-CA-021604ClosedKansas City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 March 2002Case 29-CA-024801ClosedJamaica, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2002Case 26-CA-020575ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2001Case 25-CA-027932ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 300
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 13 November 2001Case 18-RC-016907ClosedDavenport, IARegion 18Workers in the unit 8
INCLUDED: All regular full time and all regular part time outlet store clerks employed by the Employer at the Cedar Rapids, Marion and North Liberty, Iowa Locations. EXCLUDED: All office clerical, guards, supervisors and professional employees as defined in the National Labor Relations Act as amended.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2001Case 10-CA-033036ClosedColumbus, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2000Case 17-CA-020786ClosedSpringfield, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 May 2000Case 13-CA-038588ClosedSchiller Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 500
INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 25 February 2000Case 09-CA-037436ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 170
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 September 1998Case 07-CA-041400ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 400

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.