Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Johns Manville

54 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 54 are marked open by the Board · Region 04, 08, 10, 14, 16, 20, 22, 25 · Berlin, NJ; Cleburne, TX; Defiance, OH; Edison, NJ; Etowah, TN; McPherson, KS and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	51
RC	Petition for an election	3

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 August 2024Case 10-CA-348139ClosedEtowah, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 August 2024Case 10-CA-347848ClosedEtowah, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 August 2024Case 10-CA-347843ClosedEtowah, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 August 2024Case 10-CA-347758ClosedEtowah, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 August 2024Case 10-CA-347755ClosedEtowah, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 April 2024Case 10-CA-340460ClosedEtowah, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2023Case 08-CA-327020ClosedWaterville, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 28
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 May 2023Case 25-CA-318671ClosedRichmond, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 86
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 May 2023Case 04-CA-318135ClosedBerlin, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 185
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 May 2023Case 25-CA-317797ClosedRichmond, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 110
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2023Case 25-CA-314045ClosedRichmond, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 February 2023Case 04-CA-312708ClosedBerlin, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 180
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2022Case 25-CA-301539ClosedRichmond, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 July 2022Case 10-CA-299082ClosedWinder, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 320
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2022Case 10-CA-292457ClosedEtowah, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 January 2022Case 10-CA-289286ClosedEtowah, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 October 2021Case 04-CA-284730ClosedBerlin, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 182
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2021Case 10-CA-283324ClosedEtowah, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 240
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 April 2021Case 04-CA-276417ClosedBerlin, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 183
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 June 2020Case 04-CA-261249ClosedBerlin, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 173
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 May 2020Case 08-CA-260466ClosedToledo, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 480
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 May 2020Case 04-CA-260508ClosedBerlin, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 173
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2020Case 14-CA-258283ClosedMcPherson, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 March 2020Case 14-CA-257964ClosedMcpherson, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 178
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 March 2020Case 14-CA-257873ClosedMcpherson, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 178
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 6 March 2020Case 14-RC-257594ClosedMcPherson, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 178
Included: All full and regular part time production and warehouse employees working at Johns Manville in McPherson, KS. Excluded: Office clerical employees, professional employees, managerial employees, guards, supervisors, and maintenance employees, as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2020Case 08-CA-254672ClosedWaterville, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 480
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2019Case 08-CA-249518ClosedWaterville, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 480
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2019Case 22-CA-247326ClosedEdison, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 July 2019Case 08-CA-245686ClosedWaterville, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 480
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 April 2018Case 10-CA-217595ClosedEtowah, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 140
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2018Case 10-CA-217065ClosedEtowah, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 140
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 January 2018Case 10-CA-212532ClosedWinder, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 June 2017Case 16-CA-200372ClosedCleburne, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 February 2017Case 16-CA-193322ClosedCleburne, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 September 2016Case 16-CA-183781ClosedCleburne, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 August 2016Case 08-CA-182613ClosedWaterville, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 April 2016Case 08-CA-174775ClosedWaterville, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 22
JOHNS MANVILLE
CA
Filed 20 May 2015Case 25-CA-152724ClosedRichmond, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2015Case 08-CA-152648ClosedWaterville, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2014Case 16-CA-120060ClosedCleburne, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 September 2013Case 10-CA-114289ClosedEtowah, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 300
JOHNS MANVILLE
CA
Filed 1 August 2013Case 08-CA-110301ClosedWATERVILLE, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 March 2013Case 08-CA-099902ClosedDefiance, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 57
JOHNS MANVILLE
RC
Filed 27 April 2011Case 10-RC-060048ClosedEtowah, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Included All regular full time Production, Maintenance, Quality, Warehouse and Shipping employees Excluded Any and all Supervisors, Guards, Confidential and Clerical employees as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 January 2011Case 16-CA-027854ClosedCleburne, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 375
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2007Case 08-CA-037504ClosedToledo, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 October 2007Case 08-CA-037458ClosedWaterville, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2007Case 08-CA-037256ClosedToledo, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 March 2007Case 04-CA-035241ClosedBerlin, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 189
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 August 2005Case 20-CA-032666ClosedWilliams, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 August 2005Case 20-CA-032663ClosedWilliams, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2005Case 04-CA-034059ClosedBerlin, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 200
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 19 July 2005Case 20-RC-018045ClosedWilliams, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 285
All production and maitnenance; warehouse workers, production process leaders. Machine chiefs operators, packaging leaders, batch and binder attendants, facing operators, hot end floor operators, blow wool tenders, packaging operators; packaging attendants. Excluded: Shift supervisors, distribution workers, office clerical employees, salesmen, professional employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.