Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Kellogg Company

154 cases in this site's copy of the record · 5 of those 154 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 04, 06, 07, 08, 09, 13, 14, 15, 25, 32 · Battle Creek, MI; CINCINNATI, OH; Chicago, IL; Cincinnati, OH; Gardner, IL; Grand Rapids, MI and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	152
RC	Petition for an election	1
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	1

The cases

Page 1 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 September 2025Case 15-CA-373644OpenMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 September 2025Case 15-CA-372685ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 275
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2024Case 15-CA-354927ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2023Case 07-CA-331230ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 June 2023Case 15-CA-320720ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 June 2023Case 15-CA-320216ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 April 2023Case 07-CA-316840ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2023Case 14-CA-315569ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 February 2023Case 07-CA-312642ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 January 2023Case 07-CA-309806ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 November 2022Case 07-CA-308187OpenGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2022Case 07-CA-299766ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2022Case 07-CA-298655OpenGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2022Case 15-CA-297206ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 March 2022Case 07-CA-292124ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2022Case 07-CA-291542ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 January 2022Case 14-CA-288820ClosedKansas City, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 December 2021Case 15-CA-287109ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 155
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 December 2021Case 15-CA-287108ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 155
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 November 2021Case 07-CA-286010ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2021Case 07-CA-285476ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 1,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2021Case 07-CA-284183ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 1,336
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 September 2021Case 15-CA-283300ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2021Case 15-CA-282817ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 July 2021Case 07-CA-280243ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 410
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2021Case 07-CA-279243ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 410
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 June 2021Case 15-CA-278087ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2021Case 07-CA-278005ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 360
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 April 2021Case 07-CA-276345ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 410
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 April 2021Case 15-CA-275170ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 300
KELLOGG COMPANY
CA
Filed 3 December 2020Case 15-CA-269690ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 November 2020Case 07-CA-269488ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 375
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 November 2020Case 04-CA-268887ClosedLancaster, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 360
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 November 2020Case 15-CA-268804ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 November 2020Case 08-CA-268434ClosedZanesville, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2020Case 07-CA-268115ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2020Case 15-CA-267442ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2020Case 15-CA-267267ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2020Case 07-CA-267071ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 325
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2020Case 07-CA-267070ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 325
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2020Case 07-CA-267069ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 325
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2020Case 07-CA-267068ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 325
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2020Case 15-CA-266762ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2020Case 15-CA-263734ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2020Case 15-CA-262177ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2020Case 15-CA-260596ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
KELLOGG COMPANY
CA
Filed 23 April 2020Case 09-CA-259541ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 April 2020Case 15-CA-259535ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
KELLOGG COMPANY
CA
Filed 20 April 2020Case 09-CA-259437ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 55
KELLOGG COMPANY
CA
Filed 20 April 2020Case 09-CA-259424ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2020Case 15-CA-257593ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 February 2020Case 15-CA-256208ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 January 2020Case 07-CA-254988ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 360
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2020Case 07-CA-254682ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 360
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 December 2019Case 15-CA-253619ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 155
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 September 2019Case 15-CA-248832ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 236
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2019Case 15-CA-248013ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 280
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 September 2019Case 15-CA-247675ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 August 2019Case 15-CA-246972OpenMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 230
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 July 2019Case 15-CA-245784ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 July 2019Case 15-CA-245794ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 July 2019Case 15-CA-245793ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 July 2019Case 15-CA-244640ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 July 2019Case 15-CA-244616ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 July 2019Case 15-CA-244565ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 June 2019Case 15-CA-243738ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 June 2019Case 04-CA-243614ClosedLancaster, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2019Case 15-CA-242717ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 May 2019Case 14-CA-240881ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 April 2019Case 15-CA-239252ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2019Case 15-CA-236693ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 February 2019Case 15-CA-236214OpenMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2019Case 15-CA-236159ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 November 2018Case 15-CA-230734ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2018Case 14-CA-227832ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 501
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2018Case 14-CA-227830ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 501
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 September 2018Case 07-CA-227418ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2018Case 07-CA-224720ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2018Case 15-CA-223655ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 150
KELLOGG COMPANY
CA
Filed 10 July 2018Case 09-CA-223472ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 June 2018Case 15-CA-222677ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 April 2018Case 07-CA-219116ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 April 2018Case 07-CA-218528ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 375
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 April 2018Case 07-CA-218043ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 380
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 March 2018Case 15-CA-217442ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 March 2018Case 15-CA-217441ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2018Case 15-CA-216910ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2018Case 15-CA-216550ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 February 2018Case 15-CA-215165ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 290
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 October 2017Case 15-CA-208189ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 September 2017Case 15-CA-206495ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 September 2017Case 15-CA-206184ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2017Case 15-CA-203140ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 280
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 May 2017Case 15-CA-198474ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 March 2017Case 07-CA-195816ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2017Case 15-CA-195716ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 280
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2017Case 15-CA-195660ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 280
KELLOGG COMPANY
CA
Filed 31 January 2017Case 09-CA-192212ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 375
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 December 2016Case 07-CA-189643ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 December 2016Case 07-CA-189463ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2016Case 07-CA-188606ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 1,800
KELLOGG COMPANY
CA
Filed 18 October 2016Case 09-CA-186431ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 375
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2016Case 07-CA-186376ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 October 2016Case 07-CA-185563ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 July 2016Case 07-CA-180677ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
KELLOGG COMPANY
CA
Filed 8 April 2016Case 09-CA-173648ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 400
KELLOGG COMPANY
CA
Filed 6 April 2016Case 09-CA-173477ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2016Case 07-CA-172476ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 March 2016Case 15-CA-170985ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 March 2016Case 15-CA-170961ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2016Case 15-CA-170992ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2016Case 15-CA-170963ClosedRossville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 2016Case 15-CA-167679ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 280
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 June 2015Case 07-CA-154936ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 June 2015Case 07-CA-154723ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2015Case 07-CA-151154ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 March 2015Case 04-CA-148349ClosedLancaster, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 342
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 March 2015Case 04-CA-148348ClosedLancaster, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 342
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 March 2015Case 04-CA-148347ClosedLancaster, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 342
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 March 2015Case 04-CA-148346ClosedLancaster, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 342
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 March 2015Case 07-CA-147913ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2015Case 07-CA-144980ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2015Case 14-CA-143854ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2014Case 07-CA-142882ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2014Case 07-CA-139136ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2014Case 07-CA-131566ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 June 2014Case 01-CA-131164ClosedNewington, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 29
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 June 2014Case 07-CA-130570ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 April 2014Case 04-CA-126149ClosedLancaster, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 March 2014Case 07-CA-124552ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2014Case 07-CA-123603ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 February 2014Case 07-CA-123100ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2014Case 07-CA-122721ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
KELLOGG COMPANY
CA
Filed 5 February 2014Case 15-CA-122106ClosedMEMPHIS, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
KELLOGG COMPANY
CA
Filed 14 November 2013Case 15-CA-117109ClosedROSSVILLE, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2013Case 15-CA-115259ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 226
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 30 August 2013Case 13-RC-112362ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 250
Included- All general laborers, material handlers, skilled operators, klockner operators, cooks, maintenance coordinator, maintenance planner, forklift operators, sanitation workers, electricians, electronic technicians, mechanics, QA clerks, QA technicians, shift coordinators, and shipping and receiving coordinators employed by the Employer at its facility currently located at 2945 W. 31st Street, Chicago, Illinois
KELLOGG COMPANY
CA
Filed 1 July 2013Case 09-CA-108365ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 55
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 21 May 2013Case 07-UC-105604ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07
Included: all regular hourly employees in the Battle Creek plant of the Company. Hereinafter, reference to employees means employees in the bargaining unit, reference to jobs and classifications means jobs and classifications held by employes in the bargaining unit, and reference to departments means departments in which employees in the bargaining unit work unless otherwise indicated by the context. Excluded: ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 April 2013Case 07-CA-103151ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2013Case 32-CA-101554ClosedSan Jose, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2013Case 07-CA-096651ClosedWyoming, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2012Case 07-CA-090326ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 August 2012Case 07-CA-088421ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 August 2012Case 07-CA-086408ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 October 2011Case 07-CA-066386ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 July 2011Case 07-CA-061040ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 1,670
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 May 2010Case 04-CA-037497ClosedLancaster, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 January 2010Case 07-CA-052624ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2009Case 07-CA-052332ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 465

Page 1 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.