Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Kimberly Clark Corporation

35 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 35 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 04, 10, 15, 19, 21 · Chester, PA; Conway, AR; Everett, WA; Fullerton, CA; Loudon, TN; Maumelle, AR and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	33
RC	Petition for an election	1
RD	Petition to decertify	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2013Case 15-CA-115595ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 720
KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION
RC
Filed 19 October 2012Case 10-RC-091714ClosedLoudon, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 250
Included All regular Machine Operators, Waste Water, Quality Control, Mechanics, E&I and Electricians. Excluded All other employees. All La Costa and 3rd party employees, supervisors, managerial, office clerical, technical, confidential, security employees and guards, process specialists, temporary employees, professional employees and engineers.
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION
CA
Filed 11 October 2012Case 10-CA-091138ClosedLoudon, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 280
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2011Case 19-CA-033148ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 725
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 February 2011Case 19-CA-032966ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 725
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2011Case 19-CA-032932ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 750
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
CA
Filed 21 January 2011Case 19-CA-032913ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 726
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 December 2010Case 21-CA-039604ClosedFullerton, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 November 2010Case 19-CA-032849ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2010Case 19-CA-032809ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 850
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2009Case 19-CA-032076ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 850
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2009Case 15-CA-019114ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2009Case 15-CA-019113ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2009Case 19-CA-031850ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 720
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 2009Case 15-CA-019002ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2009Case 19-CA-031695ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 750
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
CA
Filed 25 July 2008Case 21-CA-038429ClosedFullerton, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 July 2008Case 19-CA-031437ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 July 2008Case 19-CA-031435ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 700
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
CA
Filed 25 June 2008Case 21-CA-038409ClosedFullerton, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 300
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
CA
Filed 5 June 2008Case 21-CA-038383ClosedFullerton, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 290
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
CA
Filed 8 May 2008Case 21-CA-038355ClosedFullerton, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 290
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 August 2007Case 19-CA-031038ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 750
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
CA
Filed 14 August 2007Case 26-CA-022837ClosedConway, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 100
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
RD
Filed 31 May 2007Case 26-RD-001138ClosedConway, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 97
Included: All full time integrated maintenance technicians, mechanical and electrical maintenance employees, and maintenance planners Excluded: Production employees, integrated maintenance trainees, process specialists, operators, which include line leaders, technicians, non-maintenance safety and training coordinators, truck drivers, office clerical, professionals, guards, and supervisors.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 May 2007Case 19-CA-030868ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 750
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
CA
Filed 22 February 2007Case 26-CA-022685ClosedConway, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 December 2006Case 19-CA-030639ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 November 2006Case 19-CA-030608ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2006Case 19-CA-030598ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 150
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
CA
Filed 20 October 2006Case 26-CA-022582ClosedConway, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 100
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
CA
Filed 7 February 2006Case 26-CA-022372ClosedConway, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
CA
Filed 30 August 2004Case 26-CA-021837ClosedMaumelle, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 275
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
CA
Filed 22 January 2001Case 34-CA-009557ClosedNew Milford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 750
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 September 1999Case 04-CA-028591ClosedChester, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 1,000

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.