Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Meijer

18 cases in this site's copy of the record · 2 of those 18 are marked open by the Board · Region 07, 09, 13, 25 · Chesterfield, MI; Cincinnati, OH; Dayton, OH; Elgin, IL; Grand Rapids, MI; Lansing, MI and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	17
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2026Case 07-CA-387954OpenGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2025Case 07-CA-372208OpenChesterfield, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 250
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 20 June 2024Case 07-UC-345205ClosedLansing, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 1
Included: All full-time and regular part-time Grocery, Meat, Produce, Food Service, Service, General Merchandise, Greeter (entered into the position or hired on or after September 17, 2012), Warehouse, Auditors (entered into the position or hired on or after February 2, 2020), Properties Shop Equipment Mechanic, and Distribution Maintenance employees at the covered units. Excluded: Employees of any leased operation, ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 June 2024Case 07-CA-343927ClosedSault Sainte Marie, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2023Case 07-CA-328745ClosedGrand Rapids, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2023Case 25-CA-317717ClosedOwensboro, KYRegion 25Workers in the unit 250
MEIJER
CA
Filed 13 August 2020Case 09-CA-264652ClosedTipp City, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 April 2020Case 13-CA-259604ClosedElgin, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 100
MEIJER
CA
Filed 3 February 2016Case 09-CA-169085ClosedDayton, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 November 2008Case 09-CA-044697ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 November 2008Case 09-CA-044696ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 November 2008Case 09-CA-044688ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 October 2008Case 09-CA-044664ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2008Case 09-CA-044638ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
MEIJER
CA
Filed 19 March 2007Case 09-CA-043498ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2007Case 07-CA-050182ClosedNorthville, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2003Case 07-CA-046960ClosedMonroe, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 June 2003Case 07-CA-046317ClosedWalker, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 300

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.