Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Methodist Hospital

32 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 32 are marked open by the Board · Region 13, 18, 20, 29 · Brooklyn, NY; Gary, IN; Minneapolis, MN; Sacramento, CA; Saint Louis Park, MN; Sciota, MN

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	29
RC	Petition for an election	3

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 June 2025Case 18-CA-368792ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 June 2025Case 18-CA-368764ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 June 2025Case 18-CA-368756ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 June 2025Case 18-CA-368746ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 June 2025Case 18-CA-368738ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,200
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 6 January 2025Case 18-RC-357896ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 98
Included: All Health Unit Coordinators employed by employer at Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital Excluded: All supervisors, guards, and managerial employees as defined by the Act and all other employees
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 November 2022Case 18-CA-307425ClosedSciota, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 October 2022Case 18-CA-305070ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2022Case 18-CA-302192ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,055
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2022Case 18-CA-302190ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,055
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2022Case 18-CA-302189ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,055
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2022Case 18-CA-302187ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,055
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2022Case 18-CA-302186ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,055
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2022Case 18-CA-302178ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,055
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2022Case 18-CA-302176ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,055
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2022Case 18-CA-302175ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,055
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2022Case 18-CA-302173ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,055
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2022Case 18-CA-302134ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,055
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2015Case 13-CA-159727ClosedGary, INRegion 13Workers in the unit 100
METHODIST HOSPITAL
CA
Filed 17 April 2012Case 18-CA-079054ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 December 2011Case 29-CA-070120ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 22
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 September 2010Case 29-CA-030389ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2009Case 29-CA-029868ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2009Case 18-CA-019028ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 November 2008Case 18-CA-018919ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 3,700
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 16 May 2008Case 20-RC-018187ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 3
RNs performing Unit and document coordination, non-manager RNs.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2008Case 18-CA-018679ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 February 2008Case 18-CA-018645ClosedSaint Louis Park, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 11 October 2007Case 29-RC-011518ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 6
Included: All regular full time and regular part time Vascular Technologist residual to the existing technical unit now represented by the uion Excluded: All supervisors and guards as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 September 2006Case 13-CA-043584ClosedGary, INRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 July 2004Case 20-CA-032007ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 December 2000Case 18-CA-015858ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 825

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.