Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

MVM

13 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 13 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 05, 12, 14, 22 · Ashburn, VA; Boston, MA; Gaithersburg, MD; Newark, NJ; SAN JUAN, PR; Saint Louis, MO and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	9
RC	Petition for an election	4

The cases

Petition for an election
RC
Filed 11 January 2018Case 14-RC-212869ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 15
Included: all full-time and part-time security personnel performing security functions as a Pre-analyst Linguist employed by the employer at 317 S. 16th St. St. Louis Mo. 63103 Excluded: clerical, managerial, salaried, and supervisory personnel as defined by the act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 March 2016Case 05-CA-172793ClosedAshburn, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 October 2012Case 24-CA-092063ClosedSAN JUAN, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 June 2012Case 24-CA-083470ClosedSan Juan, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 June 2012Case 05-CA-082579ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 110
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 3 November 2009Case 05-RC-016383ClosedGaithersburg, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 400
Included: All full-time and regular part-time security officers at the following contracted NIH facilities in Rockville, MD; Bethesda, MD; Gaithersburg, MD and Poolesville, MD: 6610 Rockledge Drive, Rockville, Maryland 20817; 6701 Rockledge Drive, Rockville, Maryland 20817; 6705 Rockledge Drive, Rockville, Maryland 20817; 6700B Rockledge Drive, Rockville, Maryland 20817; 10401 Fernwood Dr. Bethesda, Maryland 20817; ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 August 2009Case 05-CA-035186ClosedAshburn, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2009Case 22-CA-028932ClosedNewark, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 50
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 2 July 2008Case 01-RC-022226ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 80
Included: All employees currently recognized as SPFPA, Local 547 protecting the Federal Buildings in and arouond the Boston area. Excluded: All office, clerical, professional employees, and supervisors as defined in the National Labor Relations Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 16 November 2007Case 12-RC-009285ClosedVienna, VARegion 12Workers in the unit 10
Included: All full and part time Officers working for the employer, pursuant to the employers Federal Government Contract, in the localities of Miami and West Palm Beach, FL. Excluded: All Office, Cleical, Professional employees, and Supervisors, as defined by the NLRA.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2004Case 24-CA-009822ClosedSan Juan, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2004Case 24-CA-009821ClosedSan Juan, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 August 2003Case 05-CA-031390ClosedVienna, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 200

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.