Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Paragon Systems

174 cases in this site's copy of the record · 2 of those 174 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 27, 28 · Aberdeen, SD; Arlington, VA; Atlanta, GA; Attleboro, MA; BOSTON, MA; Baltimore, MD and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	156
RC	Petition for an election	13
RD	Petition to decertify	2
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	1
UD	Petition on union security	2

The cases

Page 1 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 March 2026Case 15-CA-383423ClosedMetairie, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2025Case 05-CA-374087ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 36
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2025Case 12-CA-372955OpenOrlando, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 15
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 29 July 2025Case 05-RC-370400ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 30
Included: All Private Security (SPO) Special Police Excluded: Management
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2025Case 12-CA-365298ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 May 2025Case 12-CA-365243ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 April 2025Case 05-CA-364067ClosedFrederick, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 22
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2025Case 15-CA-363820ClosedKenner, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 August 2024Case 21-CA-349684ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2024Case 05-CA-347551ClosedFrederick, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 19
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 May 2024Case 21-CA-342207ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 December 2023Case 05-CA-332274ClosedFrederick, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 21
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2023Case 05-CA-331396ClosedFrederick, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 21
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 November 2023Case 05-CA-331102OpenFrederick, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 21
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 June 2023Case 15-CA-320709ClosedKenner, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 May 2023Case 10-CA-317337ClosedSanford, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 April 2023Case 13-CA-315779ClosedSouth Holland, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 12,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 March 2023Case 12-CA-314951ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 118
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 January 2023Case 05-CA-309987ClosedFrederick, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 22
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 December 2022Case 03-CA-309646ClosedSaint Albans, VTRegion 03Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 November 2022Case 28-CA-307287ClosedMaricopa, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2022Case 08-CA-305896ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 October 2022Case 13-CA-305246ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 June 2022Case 04-CA-297498ClosedSlatington, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 27
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 May 2022Case 16-CA-296770ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 19
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 May 2022Case 08-CA-295216ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2022Case 05-CA-294142ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 140
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 28 February 2022Case 27-RD-291371ClosedOgden, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 65
Include: Ogden IRS Security Guards
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 November 2021Case 05-CA-286575ClosedArlington, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 November 2021Case 12-CA-286008ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 120
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 13 August 2021Case 27-RC-281340ClosedPocatello, IDRegion 27Workers in the unit 62
Include: All full-time and part time armed and unarmed security officers employed by the Employer. Exclude: Clerical, Managerial, Salaried, and supervisory personal as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 July 2021Case 13-CA-280211ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
PARAGON SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 22 June 2021Case 21-CA-278990ClosedLaguna Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 June 2021Case 21-CA-278723ClosedLaguna Niguel, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 400
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 2 June 2021Case 05-RC-277919ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 30
Included: All armed and unarmed officers. Excluded: All personal, Captains, Project Manager, office
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2021Case 21-CA-277549ClosedCovina, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 April 2021Case 21-CA-276393ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2021Case 13-CA-274729ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 March 2021Case 13-CA-274369ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 March 2021Case 27-CA-273919ClosedOgden, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 February 2021Case 05-CA-273286ClosedHerndon, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 January 2021Case 03-CA-271810ClosedRochester, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 260
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 2021Case 13-CA-271359ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2021Case 05-CA-271288ClosedDerwood, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 November 2020Case 27-CA-269515ClosedOgden, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 November 2020Case 05-CA-269428ClosedHerndon, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 November 2020Case 27-CA-269081ClosedOgden, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2020Case 13-CA-266675ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 8
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 July 2020Case 13-CA-262580ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2020Case 13-CA-258423ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 February 2020Case 13-CA-256900ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2020Case 10-CA-255909ClosedRaleigh, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 January 2020Case 10-CA-255202ClosedRaleigh, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 January 2020Case 10-CA-254778ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 January 2020Case 05-CA-254903ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 38
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 December 2019Case 15-CA-253650ClosedKenner, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 December 2019Case 13-CA-253581ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 December 2019Case 15-CA-253153ClosedKenner, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 90
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 31 October 2019Case 05-RC-250930ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 8
Included: All full-time and part-time guards employed by the Employer at the U.S. Peace Corps facility; Excluded: Office clericals, professional employees, managers or other supervisors as defined by the Act
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2019Case 10-CA-250277ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 August 2019Case 10-CA-246819ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2019Case 10-CA-245527ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 July 2019Case 10-CA-244450ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 May 2019Case 05-CA-241446ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 14
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2019Case 05-CA-237734ClosedHerndon, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 39
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2019Case 05-CA-237733ClosedHerndon, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 39
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2019Case 05-CA-237732ClosedHerndon, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 39
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 March 2019Case 13-CA-237369ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 February 2019Case 13-CA-236548ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 February 2019Case 18-CA-236549ClosedAberdeen, SDRegion 18Workers in the unit 30
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 5 February 2019Case 05-RC-235322ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 22
Included: All full-time and part-time armed and unarmed security officers employed by the employer; Excluded: Clerical, managerial, salaried, and supervisory personnel as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 January 2019Case 01-CA-234695ClosedAttleboro, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 180
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2018Case 08-CA-230291ClosedYoungstown, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 11
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 October 2018Case 15-CA-228675ClosedBaton Rouge, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 September 2018Case 05-CA-227709ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 39
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 September 2018Case 15-CA-227562ClosedNew Orleans, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 September 2018Case 13-CA-227158ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2018Case 15-CA-225634ClosedNew Orleans, LARegion 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2018Case 13-CA-225027ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2018Case 13-CA-225026ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2018Case 15-CA-222698ClosedNew Orleans, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 90
PARAGON SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 1 June 2018Case 21-CA-221463ClosedCOVINA, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 April 2018Case 13-CA-219351ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2018Case 13-CA-219279ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 April 2018Case 13-CA-217960ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2018Case 13-CA-216713ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 March 2018Case 25-CA-216437ClosedSpringfield, ILRegion 25Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2018Case 04-CA-213251ClosedScranton, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 24
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2017Case 10-CA-209281ClosedHoover, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 October 2017Case 13-CA-207699ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 September 2017Case 13-CA-205901ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 August 2017Case 13-CA-205162ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2017Case 13-CA-201591ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2017Case 25-CA-198281ClosedSpringfield, ILRegion 25Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2017Case 13-CA-198331ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2017Case 13-CA-198277ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2017Case 13-CA-198276ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2017Case 13-CA-198275ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2017Case 13-CA-198274ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2017Case 13-CA-198272ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2017Case 13-CA-198271ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2017Case 13-CA-198270ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2017Case 13-CA-198269ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2017Case 13-CA-198268ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2017Case 13-CA-198266ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2017Case 13-CA-198265ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2017Case 13-CA-198264ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2017Case 13-CA-198010ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2017Case 13-CA-198009ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2017Case 13-CA-198008ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2017Case 13-CA-198005ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 March 2017Case 13-CA-194254ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2017Case 08-CA-192733ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 December 2016Case 05-CA-190536ClosedHerndon, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 November 2016Case 08-CA-187912ClosedKent, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 48
Petition on union security
UD
Filed 14 October 2016Case 05-UD-186230ClosedWoodlawn, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 70
Included: Full-time and part-time security guards, as defined in Section 9(b)(3) of the NLRB, as assigned by Employer at Wabash Social Security Administration. Excluded: Office clerical employees, professional employees, project managers, captains, and all other supervisors as defined by the Act.
Petition on union security
UD
Filed 13 July 2016Case 05-UD-180049ClosedRockville, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 58
Included: All bargaining unit employees
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 July 2016Case 08-CA-180048ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 February 2016Case 13-CA-170711ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 400
PARAGON SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 8 February 2016Case 16-CA-169463ClosedCorpus Christi, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2016Case 16-CA-169461ClosedLaredo, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 January 2016Case 10-CA-168371ClosedHerndon, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 November 2015Case 08-CA-164409ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 4,700
PARAGON SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 22 June 2015Case 01-CA-154584ClosedBOSTON, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 April 2015Case 10-CA-149955ClosedHerndon, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 November 2014Case 20-CA-140714ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 90
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 3 October 2014Case 10-UC-138113ClosedBirmingham, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 137
The employer for a single contract to provide security guard services in the state of Alabama for federal facilities serviced by the Federal Protective Service ("FPS") is Paragon Systems, Inc. Paragon Systems, Inc. is the employer for employees currently designated into four (4) separate bargaining units. Two of these bargaining units are represented by the Petitioner, the Protection and Response Officers of America ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 September 2014Case 20-CA-137322ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 July 2014Case 10-CA-133128ClosedPelham, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 June 2014Case 10-CA-130684ClosedPelham, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 April 2014Case 10-CA-126981ClosedPelham, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 6
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 18 March 2014Case 05-RC-124709ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 98
Included All full and part-time regular security officers and sergeants employed by the Employer at the Federal Triangle Center/EPA East-12th & Constitution Avenue NW & EPA West-1301 Constitution Avenue NW-Wash, DC 20423 & 20001. Excluded All Lieutenants, Captains, managerial employees, office clerical employees, professional employees and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 March 2014Case 08-CA-123461ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 4,700
PARAGON SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 4 February 2014Case 09-CA-121905ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 60
PARAGON SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 23 January 2014Case 09-CA-121121ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 December 2013Case 20-CA-118772ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 95
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2013Case 20-CA-115888ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 112
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 20 August 2013Case 12-RC-111630ClosedHerndon, VARegion 12Workers in the unit 17
Included: All regular part time and full time Protective Security Officers employed by the employer in Tallahassee, Panama City, Pensacola, Quincy and Mariette Florida and surrounding areas. Excluded: All office employees, clerical employees, professional employees and supervisors as defined by hte Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 3 June 2013Case 01-RC-106310ClosedBangor, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Included All full time and part time security officers performing security duties at the Margaret Chase Federal Building Excluded All other employees, including office and clerical professionals and supervisors as defined in the Act
PARAGON SYSTEMS
RC
Filed 30 May 2013Case 01-RC-106134ClosedBangor, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Included All full time and part tme security guard employees working for the employer at Federal Building on the Government Homeland Security Contract in Bangor, Maine Excluded All other employees, including office and clerical professionals and supervisors as defined in the Act
PARAGON SYSTEMS
CA
Filed 5 April 2013Case 21-CA-102127ClosedHERNDON, VARegion 21Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 March 2013Case 05-CA-099928ClosedHerndon, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 50
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 26 February 2013Case 05-RC-099051ClosedLeesburg, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 20
Included: All full-time and regular part-time security guards working at Skyline Towers located at 5107 Leasburg Pike, Falls Church, Virginia Excluded: All supervisors, administrative, professional and clerical staff employed by the employer at the above location as described by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2013Case 05-CA-096530ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 54
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 7 November 2012Case 05-RC-092718ClosedHerndon, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 45
Included: All full-time and regular part-time security officers and sergeants employed by the employer at the St. Elizabeth Complex in Washington, DC located at 2701 Martin Kuther King Avenue, Southeast WDC 20032 Excluded: All office clerical employees, professional employees, and supervisors as defined by the Act
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2012Case 20-CA-092434ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 October 2012Case 27-CA-091962ClosedSalt Lake City, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 July 2012Case 20-CA-084920ClosedSouth San Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 June 2012Case 02-CA-082792ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 May 2012Case 21-CA-082291ClosedCovina, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 300

Page 1 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.