Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Phillips 66

59 cases in this site's copy of the record · 10 of those 59 are marked open by the Board · Region 03, 10, 14, 15, 16, 19, 21, 22, 27, 31, 32 · ARROYO GRANDE, CA; Arroyo Grande, CA; Bath, NY; Belle Chasse, LA; Billings, MT; Borger, TX and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	55
RD	Petition to decertify	4

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 July 2026Case 27-CA-391173OpenBillings, MTRegion 27Workers in the unit 192
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 23 January 2026Case 21-RD-379648ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 7
Included: The Portion of the unit including all full-time and regular part-time Midstream Lead Maintenance Technician, Midstream Maintenance Technician, Midstream Lead Person, Midstream Bulk Operator employees and any other employee whose principal duties include: receiving, storing, and dispensing bulk liquid commodities, gauging. loading, blending, compounding, package and terminal warehousing, products testing, ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 March 2025Case 10-CA-362305ClosedSavannah, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 15
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 18 March 2025Case 10-RD-362117ClosedSavannah, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 8
Included: USW Local 643 9-00795 UNIT 4
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 February 2025Case 22-CA-360321OpenLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 December 2024Case 14-CA-356412ClosedPonca City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 November 2024Case 14-CA-355035ClosedPonca City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 May 2024Case 14-CA-341913ClosedPonca City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 622
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 April 2024Case 27-CA-340461OpenBillings, MTRegion 27Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 April 2024Case 15-CA-340621OpenLake Charles, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 April 2024Case 14-CA-340466OpenPonca City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 April 2024Case 32-CA-340861OpenRodeo, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 April 2024Case 22-CA-340526OpenLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 460
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 April 2024Case 21-CA-340251OpenWilmington, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 April 2024Case 19-CA-339939OpenFerndale, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2024Case 14-CA-338628ClosedPonca City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2024Case 14-CA-338626OpenPonca City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 March 2024Case 14-CA-337500ClosedPonca City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2024Case 14-CA-337325ClosedPonca City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 700
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 18 January 2024Case 31-RD-333815ClosedTorrance, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 34
Included: Gaugers, Mechanics, Operators, Utility Person
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 August 2023Case 14-CA-323998ClosedPonca City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 April 2023Case 14-CA-318091ClosedPonca City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2021Case 15-CA-271213ClosedBelle Chasse, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 850
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 2020Case 19-CA-264370ClosedFerndale, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2020Case 22-CA-264045ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 May 2020Case 22-CA-259895ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 February 2020Case 22-CA-255746ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2020Case 22-CA-254645ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 450
PHILLIPS 66
RD
Filed 3 September 2019Case 16-RD-247503ClosedSweeny, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 27
Included: The operating and maintenance employees at the Employers Alvin, Texas operations, comprising the Chocolate Bayou District, including those operating and maintenance employees employed on the Employer's 10-inch main line originating at the Benedum, Texas Pump Station and extending to the Phillips 66 Company's Refinery at Sweeny, Texas. Excluded: Employees at the Benedum, Texas Pump Station technical ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 August 2019Case 16-CA-246004ClosedBorger, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2019Case 22-CA-245538ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2019Case 22-CA-241838ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2019Case 22-CA-241550ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 April 2019Case 22-CA-239475ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2019Case 22-CA-238518ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 March 2019Case 22-CA-238313ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 March 2019Case 22-CA-237856ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 November 2017Case 22-CA-210580ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 September 2017Case 19-CA-205519ClosedMissoula, MTRegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 April 2017Case 22-CA-197221ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2017Case 22-CA-191669ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 November 2016Case 22-CA-188024ClosedLinden, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 800
PHILLIPS 66
CA
Filed 7 December 2015Case 22-CA-165618ClosedLINDEN, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 650
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2015Case 16-CA-163271ClosedBorger, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2015Case 31-CA-156657ClosedArroyo Grande, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2015Case 31-CA-156651ClosedArroyo Grande, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 September 2014Case 14-CA-136148ClosedPonca City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 June 2013Case 14-CA-108315ClosedPonca City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2013Case 31-CA-096709ClosedARROYO GRANDE, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 January 2013Case 31-CA-096057ClosedArroyo Grande, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 75
PHILLIPS 66
CA
Filed 25 October 2012Case 22-CA-092539ClosedLINDEN, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2012Case 16-CA-090333ClosedSweeny, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 September 2012Case 31-CA-090171ClosedArroyo Grande, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 75
PHILLIPS 66
CA
Filed 14 September 2012Case 16-CA-089250ClosedSweeny, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 September 2012Case 16-CA-089036ClosedSweeny, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 August 2012Case 16-CA-087373ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2012Case 15-CA-085731ClosedBelle Chasse, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 July 2012Case 31-CA-085243ClosedArroyo Grande, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 October 2007Case 03-CA-026465ClosedBath, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 365

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.