Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Planned Building Services

30 cases in this site's copy of the record · 1 of those 30 are marked open by the Board · Region 02, 22 · Fairfield, NJ; GUTTENBERG, NJ; Guttenberg, NJ; Jersey City, NJ; New Jersey, NJ; New York, NY and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	25
RC	Petition for an election	4
RD	Petition to decertify	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 2020Case 22-CA-264428ClosedJersey City, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 January 2020Case 22-CA-255220ClosedJersey City, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 15
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 21 February 2018Case 22-RD-215188ClosedGuttenberg, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 40
Included: Housekeeping and front desk employees who are employed by Employer a Galaxy Towers. Excluded: professional, office clerical, supervisors and guards as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2017Case 02-CA-201783ClosedValhalla, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 May 2017Case 02-CA-198337ClosedValhalla, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 5
PLANNED BUILDING SERVICES
RC
Filed 3 April 2013Case 22-RC-101864ClosedGUTTENBERG, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 22
INC: ALL FULL TIME AND REGULAR PART TIME HOUSEKEEPING EMPLOYEES EMPLOYED BY THE EMPLOYER BUT. EXCLUDING: ALL OFFICE CLERICAL EMPLOYERS PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYER GUARDS AND SUPERVISORS AS DEFINED IN THE ACT ALL OTHER EMPOYEES...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 June 2011Case 22-CA-030026ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 May 2011Case 02-CA-040481ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 02Workers in the unit 8
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2011Case 02-CA-040469ClosedParsippany-Troy Hills, NJRegion 02Workers in the unit 10
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 4 October 2010Case 02-RC-023541Closednew york, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 8
Included: All full time and regular part time porter, handyman, maintenance workers, doorman and cocierge. Excluded: All supervisors, managers, including the superintendent, and guards as defined by the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 3 September 2010Case 22-RC-013154ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 4
Inc. All full time regular part-time porters, cleaners, and handyperson employed by the Employer at its 1130 Grant St., Hoboken, NJ 07030 facility. Exc. All office employees, guards and supervisors and others as defined in the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 18 March 2010Case 02-RC-023464Closedparsippany, NJRegion 02Workers in the unit 20
Included: All full time and regular part time handymen, porters, and security guards at 747 50th Street and 10th Avenue, (hudson view) Location Excluced: All managers, supervisors clerical employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 July 2008Case 02-CA-038876ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 02Workers in the unit 9
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 January 2004Case 02-CA-036035ClosedFairfield, NJRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 November 2002Case 02-CA-035577ClosedFairfield, NJRegion 02Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 June 2002Case 02-CA-034713ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2002Case 02-CA-034431ClosedNew Jersey, NJRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2002Case 02-CA-034430ClosedNew Jersey, NJRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2001Case 02-CA-034118ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 April 2001Case 02-CA-033687ClosedNew Jersey, NJRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 December 2000Case 02-CA-033482ClosedFairfield, NJRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2000Case 02-CA-033449ClosedFairfield, NJRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 November 2000Case 02-CA-033404ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2000Case 02-CA-033394ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 October 2000Case 02-CA-033387ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 August 2000Case 02-CA-033197ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2000Case 02-CA-033146OpenNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2000Case 02-CA-033055ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 July 1998Case 02-CA-031580ClosedFairfield, NJRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 February 1998Case 02-CA-031268ClosedFairfield, NJRegion 02Workers in the unit 100

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.