Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Pritchard Industries

30 cases in this site's copy of the record · 2 of those 30 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 05, 12, 15, 16, 22 · Arlington, VA; Boston, MA; East Providence, RI; Florham Park, NJ; Houston, TX; Keansburg, NJ and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	26
RC	Petition for an election	1
RM	Petition filed by an employer	3

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 April 2026Case 15-CA-384594OpenNew Orleans, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 16
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2025Case 05-CA-367008OpenArlington, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 11
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2024Case 16-CA-343375ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2024Case 16-CA-343340ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 37
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2024Case 16-CA-343321ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2023Case 02-CA-331957ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 November 2023Case 01-CA-329874ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 May 2023Case 02-CA-318328ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2022Case 22-CA-299625ClosedKeansburg, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 25
Petition filed by an employer
RM
Filed 17 December 2021Case 22-RM-287892ClosedKeansburg, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 26
INCLUDED: Cleaning, service employees at Keansburg schools. EXCLUDED: Management
Petition filed by an employer
RM
Filed 8 December 2021Case 22-RM-287366ClosedKeansburg, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 26
Included: Janitors Excluded: Management
Petition filed by an employer
RM
Filed 29 November 2021Case 22-RM-287128ClosedKeansburg, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 26
INCLUDED: Cleaning, service employee at Keansburg schools. EXCLUDED: Management.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2019Case 12-CA-252851ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2019Case 02-CA-245409ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 June 2018Case 05-CA-222079ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2015Case 02-CA-147647ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 October 2014Case 02-CA-139410ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
PRITCHARD INDUSTRIES
RC
Filed 27 August 2013Case 22-RC-112102ClosedSCOTCH PLAINS, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 10
INC. ALL FULL TIME AND PART TIME COSTODIANS. EXC. SUPERVISORS, CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL SECURITY GUARDS AND MANAGERS AS PER DESCRIBED IN THE ACT.
PRITCHARD INDUSTRIES
CA
Filed 18 December 2012Case 02-CA-095123ClosedNEW YORK, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
PRITCHARD INDUSTRIES
CA
Filed 30 March 2012Case 02-CA-077942ClosedNEW YORK, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 August 2011Case 22-CA-062216ClosedFlorham Park, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 70
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 January 2010Case 16-CA-027253ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 November 2009Case 16-CA-027157ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 November 2009Case 16-CA-027137ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 November 2009Case 16-CA-027113ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 760
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2009Case 02-CA-039478ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2007Case 01-CA-043947ClosedEast Providence, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 March 2006Case 02-CA-037557ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 July 2003Case 02-CA-035631ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2002Case 02-CA-034481ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 13

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.