Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Public Service Company of New Mexico

31 cases in this site's copy of the record · 1 of those 31 are marked open by the Board · Region 28 · Alamogordo, NM; Albuquerque, NM; La Mesa, NM

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	28
RC	Petition for an election	1
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	2

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2026Case 28-CA-394778OpenLa Mesa, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2022Case 28-CA-297242ClosedAlamogordo, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 August 2021Case 28-CA-281343ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 April 2021Case 28-CA-275903ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 May 2018Case 28-CA-220710ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2017Case 28-CA-206709ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 June 2017Case 28-CA-201167ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2017Case 28-CA-199079ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 April 2017Case 28-CA-197065ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 March 2017Case 28-CA-195757ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 August 2015Case 28-CA-158707ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 2015Case 28-CA-157736ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 920
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 August 2013Case 28-CA-111296ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 920
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2013Case 28-CA-105815ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 920
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 October 2011Case 28-CA-066164ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 920
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2011Case 28-CA-023391ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 920
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 November 2010Case 28-CA-023265ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 920
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 August 2010Case 28-CA-023148ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 920
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 August 2010Case 28-CA-023135ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 920
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2010Case 28-CA-023046ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 920
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 April 2010Case 28-CA-022997ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 920
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 October 2009Case 28-CA-022759ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 920
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2009Case 28-CA-022655ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 920
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 October 2008Case 28-CA-022197ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 920
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 July 2008Case 28-CA-022039ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 April 2008Case 28-CA-021870ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 101
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 1 March 2007Case 28-UC-000238ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 600
PRESENT: The existing unit is described in the current collective bargaining agreement in Article 3B, as: B, Appropriate Unit. The appropriate unit to which this Agreement applies, shall consist of all employees of the Company's electric and water transmission departments in the divisions and jobs referenced in the Agreement. The jobs and classifications are described in Article 50, Work Rules for Distribution ...
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 6 February 2007Case 28-UC-000237ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 600
Since on or about January 1, 2007, particulary on January 24, 2007, and continuing to date, the above-named Employer, by and though its officers, agents and supervisors, ahs refused to bargain in good faith with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Woekrs, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 611, by failing and refusing to (1) process a grievance regardibg the proper pay of "TNMP" employees while working as supplemental ...
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 22 February 2005Case 28-RC-006350ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 48
Included: The following classifications in the Customer and Delivery Services/New Service Delivery Group in a self-determination election: Foreman I, Foreman II, Crewman Sr., Crewman I, Crewman II. The employees identified on the petition shall be included in the existing bargaining unit of production and maintenance employees. Excluded: All other employees, office clericals, guards, watchmen and supervisors as ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2004Case 28-CA-019242ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 570
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 October 2003Case 28-CA-019081ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 570

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.