Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Queens Medical Center

52 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 52 are marked open by the Board · Region 20 · Honolulu, HI

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	49
RC	Petition for an election	3

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2017Case 20-CA-197685ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 2016Case 20-CA-167566ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 March 2015Case 20-CA-148427ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 January 2015Case 20-CA-145410ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 January 2015Case 20-CA-145338ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2015Case 20-CA-143887ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2015Case 20-CA-143885ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 December 2014Case 20-CA-142477ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 November 2014Case 20-CA-141928ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 November 2014Case 20-CA-141925ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 13 August 2014Case 20-RC-134646ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 20
All F/T and P/T Inpatient Case Managers employed at QMC Excluded: Any and all Managerial Employees, Security Personnel, Call-In RNs as described under the Act
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 July 2014Case 20-CA-132312ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2014Case 20-CA-131817ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 June 2014Case 20-CA-130925ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 June 2014Case 20-CA-130463ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 April 2014Case 20-CA-127743ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2014Case 20-CA-127564ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 April 2014Case 20-CA-127557ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2014Case 20-CA-123305ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2014Case 20-CA-122885ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 December 2013Case 20-CA-118858ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 December 2013Case 20-CA-118849ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 December 2013Case 20-CA-118811ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 September 2013Case 20-CA-114465ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 September 2013Case 20-CA-114463ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 September 2013Case 20-CA-114462ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2013Case 20-CA-113025ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2013Case 20-CA-111718ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2013Case 20-CA-111675ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2013Case 20-CA-106394ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2013Case 20-CA-106392ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2013Case 20-CA-106110ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2013Case 20-CA-106109ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2013Case 20-CA-102955ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,300
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 6 March 2013Case 20-RC-099717ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 40
Included: All F/T, P/T, CI Transporter, classification employees, employed with Queen's Medical Center Excluded: Any and all Managerial/Supervisory/Security personnel as described under the Act.
QUEENS MEDICAL CENTER
RC
Filed 6 August 2012Case 20-RC-086686ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 July 2012Case 20-CA-084589ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,179
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 May 2012Case 20-CA-081356ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 April 2012Case 20-CA-079018ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 April 2012Case 20-CA-079017ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 April 2012Case 20-CA-078625ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2011Case 37-CA-008288ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,022
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 March 2011Case 37-CA-008286ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,022
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 May 2008Case 37-CA-007592ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 April 2008Case 37-CA-007552ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 January 2008Case 37-CA-007509ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 550
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 October 2007Case 37-CA-007441ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2007Case 37-CA-007423ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 540
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2007Case 37-CA-007421ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2007Case 37-CA-007420ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 January 2002Case 37-CA-006059ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2000Case 37-CA-005654ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 550

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.