Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Raley's

41 cases in this site's copy of the record · 3 of those 41 are marked open by the Board · Region 20, 28, 32 · ALAMEDA, CA; Chico, CA; Elko, NV; FREMONT, CA; Jackson, CA; LOS GATOS, CA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	35
RC	Petition for an election	5
RD	Petition to decertify	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 June 2026Case 20-CA-389495OpenWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 117
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2026Case 32-CA-388427OpenElko, NVRegion 32Workers in the unit 46
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2026Case 28-CA-382325OpenTonopah, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 3
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 April 2025Case 20-CA-363696ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 124
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 March 2025Case 32-CA-361809ClosedElko, NVRegion 32Workers in the unit 46
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 12 February 2025Case 32-RC-360184ClosedElko, NVRegion 32Workers in the unit 46
Included: All full-time and regular part-time employees of the employer employed at 2505 Mountain City Hwy, Elko, NV Excluded: Store team leader, assistant store leader and operations team leader, supervisors and guards
Raley’s
CA
Filed 13 September 2024Case 20-CA-350582ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 March 2019Case 32-CA-237434ClosedReno, NVRegion 32Workers in the unit 12,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 19 April 2018Case 20-RC-218751ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 40
lncluded. All Pharmacists or Pharmacy interns duly licensed to and holding a valid license issued by the State of Califomia, employed at Employer's Bel Air pharmacy locations for potential addition to the existing bargaining unit at Employer's Raley's pharmacy locations currently represented by Independent Pharmacists Association, as a result of an Armour-Globe election. Excluded: All oiher employees, managers, ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 December 2014Case 20-CA-142073ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 September 2014Case 20-CA-136468ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 July 2014Case 20-CA-132850ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 February 2014Case 20-CA-123198ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 December 2013Case 20-CA-119127ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 November 2012Case 32-CA-093072ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 November 2012Case 32-CA-093058ClosedMARTINEZ, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 November 2012Case 32-CA-092932ClosedALAMEDA, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2012Case 32-CA-092849ClosedWATSONVILLE, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2012Case 32-CA-092847ClosedLOS GATOS, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2012Case 32-CA-092842ClosedWALNUT CREEK, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2012Case 32-CA-092817ClosedFREMONT, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2012Case 20-CA-092937ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2012Case 20-CA-092482ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 7,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 April 2012Case 20-CA-078892ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 November 2011Case 32-CA-069804ClosedJackson, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 25 February 2009Case 32-RD-001570ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Included: All full-time and regualr part-time warehouse employees, group leaders and janitors employed by the Employer at its 1919 Boeing Way, Stockton, California facility. Excluded: All managerial and adminstrative employees, salespersons, office clerical employees, all other employees, guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 July 2008Case 32-CA-024016ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 March 2008Case 32-CA-023794ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 60
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 14 November 2007Case 32-RC-005542ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 56
Included: Forklift drivers, selectors, lift drivers, hostlers, janitors, cage employees, shipping and receiving, inventory control, leadworkers, replenishment employess, packaging employees, audit employees, loaders. Excluded: Supervisors, guards
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 October 2005Case 20-CA-032753ClosedChico, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 8 August 2005Case 20-RC-018050ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 137
Pharmacy Technicians at all Raley's Retail Drug Centers. Excluded: All other employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 25 July 2005Case 20-RC-018047ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 137
Included: Pharmacy Technicians at all Raley's Drug Centers. Excluded: All other employees, guards and supervisors as define din the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 September 2003Case 32-CA-020911ClosedSan Pablo, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 70
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2003Case 32-CA-020809ClosedSan Pablo, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 July 2003Case 32-CA-020747ClosedSan Pablo, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2001Case 20-CA-030265ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 July 1997Case 20-CA-027938ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 March 1997Case 20-CA-027729ClosedShoshone, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 1993Case 20-CA-025825ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 1993Case 20-CA-025195ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 October 1992Case 20-CA-024973ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,200

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.