Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Rite Aid Corporation

97 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 97 are marked open by the Board · Region 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 19, 20, 21, 22, 29, 31 · Akron, OH; Brooklyn, NY; Camp Hill, PA; Camp hill, PA; Canonsburg, PA; Chino Hills, CA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	93
RC	Petition for an election	2
RD	Petition to decertify	1
UD	Petition on union security	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 June 2019Case 19-CA-244280ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 225
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2018Case 31-CA-227373ClosedChino Hills, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 60,800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 November 2017Case 31-CA-210810ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2017Case 31-CA-205485ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2017Case 21-CA-191809ClosedIrvine, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 2,000
Rite-Aid Corporation
CA
Filed 18 August 2015Case 20-CA-158399ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Rite-Aid Corporation
CA
Filed 2 February 2015Case 20-CA-145796ClosedRancho Cordova, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2014Case 19-CA-138197ClosedRedmond, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2014Case 31-CA-122091ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2013Case 31-CA-117700ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2013Case 31-CA-105533ClosedSHERMAN OAKS, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 April 2013Case 31-CA-103608ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 February 2013Case 31-CA-097980ClosedCamp Hill, PARegion 31Workers in the unit 460
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 December 2012Case 19-CA-094427ClosedWoodinville, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 October 2011Case 02-CA-067827ClosedFlushing, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2011Case 31-CA-030303ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 530
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 May 2011Case 31-CA-030238ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 May 2011Case 07-CA-053674ClosedFenwick, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 30
Rite-Aid Corporation
CA
Filed 9 March 2011Case 31-CA-030138ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 January 2011Case 04-CA-037930ClosedCamp Hill, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 522
Rite-Aid Corporation
CA
Filed 17 December 2010Case 31-CA-030062ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 600
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 13 December 2010Case 04-RD-002195ClosedMedford, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 13
All full-time and regular part-time cashiers, shift supervisors and pharmacy technicians employed by the Employer currently at its 409 Stokes Road, Medford facility.
Rite-Aid Corporation
CA
Filed 2 December 2010Case 31-CA-030051ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 600
Rite-Aid Corporation
CA
Filed 2 December 2010Case 31-CA-030050ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 600
Rite-Aid Corporation
CA
Filed 2 December 2010Case 31-CA-030049ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 600
Rite-Aid Corporation
CA
Filed 7 October 2010Case 31-CA-029971ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 600
Rite-Aid Corporation
CA
Filed 10 September 2010Case 31-CA-029928ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2010Case 31-CA-029895ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 August 2010Case 31-CA-029865ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 June 2010Case 31-CA-029812ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2010Case 29-CA-030259ClosedStaten Island, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Rite-Aid Corporation
CA
Filed 24 May 2010Case 31-CA-029742ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2010Case 04-CA-037390ClosedCollingswood, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 January 2010Case 31-CA-029567ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2009Case 29-CA-029965ClosedQueens, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2009Case 19-CA-032213ClosedRedmond, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 May 2009Case 31-CA-029265ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 680
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 April 2009Case 31-CA-029223ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 680
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 March 2009Case 29-CA-029517ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 March 2009Case 29-CA-029499ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 January 2009Case 04-CA-036566ClosedCamp Hill, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 January 2009Case 31-CA-029064ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 680
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2009Case 29-CA-029393ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2008Case 31-CA-028992ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 680
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 October 2008Case 31-CA-028976ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 680
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 October 2008Case 02-CA-039015ClosedCamp Hill, PARegion 02Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 October 2008Case 02-CA-038987ClosedCamp hill, PARegion 02Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2008Case 31-CA-028862ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 680
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 August 2008Case 31-CA-028858ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 680
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 June 2008Case 31-CA-028806ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 680
Rite-Aid Corporation
RC
Filed 12 June 2008Case 04-RC-021457ClosedMedford, NJRegion 04Workers in the unit 18
All full time and regular part time clerks, key supervisors and pharmacy tech personnel employed by the Employer at its 409 Stokes Road, Medford, NJ facility.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2008Case 31-CA-028779ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 680
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2008Case 31-CA-028753ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 680
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2008Case 31-CA-028741ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 680
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 November 2007Case 02-CA-038543ClosedCamp Hill, PARegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 October 2007Case 31-CA-028546ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 680
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 October 2007Case 02-CA-038486ClosedCamp Hill, PARegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000
Rite-Aid Corporation
CA
Filed 26 September 2007Case 31-CA-028496ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 670
Rite-Aid Corporation
CA
Filed 26 September 2007Case 31-CA-028495ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 670
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 August 2007Case 04-CA-035590ClosedCamp Hill, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 592
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 August 2007Case 02-CA-038411ClosedCamp Hill, PARegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 July 2007Case 31-CA-028402ClosedLindcove, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 June 2007Case 02-CA-038307ClosedCamp Hill, PARegion 02Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 May 2007Case 31-CA-028295ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 April 2007Case 04-CA-035295ClosedCamp Hill, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 667
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 April 2007Case 31-CA-028224ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 March 2007Case 31-CA-028203ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2007Case 31-CA-028200ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2007Case 31-CA-028156ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2007Case 31-CA-028142ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 January 2007Case 31-CA-028136ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 December 2006Case 31-CA-028093ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2006Case 31-CA-028035ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2006Case 31-CA-028034ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2006Case 31-CA-028033ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2006Case 31-CA-028032ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2006Case 31-CA-028031ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2006Case 31-CA-028030ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2006Case 31-CA-028029ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2006Case 31-CA-028028ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2006Case 31-CA-028027ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2006Case 31-CA-028026ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2006Case 31-CA-028025ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 620
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 September 2006Case 31-CA-027970ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 750
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 July 2006Case 31-CA-027920ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 750
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 2 June 2006Case 31-RC-008587ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 615
Includes: All regular full time & regular part-time general warehouse & maintenance employees employed by Rite Aid Corporation at its facility located at 2801 W. H. Lancaster, CA 93536. Excluded: Leads in the following dep'ts: Replenishment, Inbound, Outbound, SYIC, Cigarette; Coordinators in Each Pick dep't; Administrative Office Clerical, Corporate & Professional Employees, Manager, Temporary Employees, ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2006Case 03-CA-025879ClosedHarrisburg, PARegion 03Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2006Case 31-CA-027790ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 820
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2005Case 08-CA-036099ClosedAkron, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 400
Petition on union security
UD
Filed 8 September 2005Case 06-UD-000187ClosedWellsburg, WVRegion 06Workers in the unit 18
Included: All non-professional employees including front end clerks, key cashiers and pharmacy technicians employed by the Employer at its Wellsburg, WV facility;excluding, all managers, assistant managers, pharmacists, office clerical employees and guards, other professional employees and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 2005Case 04-CA-033713ClosedCamp Hill, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 February 2004Case 22-CA-026202ClosedHoboken, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 June 2002Case 05-CA-030513ClosedPerryman, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 1,400
RITE AID CORPORATION
CA
Filed 25 February 2002Case 09-CA-039106ClosedDayton, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 131
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2000Case 06-CA-031499ClosedCanonsburg, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 July 2000Case 06-CA-031475ClosedCresson, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 9
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 October 1997Case 20-CA-028090ClosedWoodland, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 67

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.