Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Rock Tenn

23 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 23 are marked open by the Board · Region 03, 04, 05, 07, 09, 10, 13, 15, 16, 18, 32 · BLUE ASH, OH; Battle Creek, MI; Blue Ash, OH; Bridgeview, IL; Coatpoe, AL; Conway, AR and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	22
RC	Petition for an election	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2015Case 04-CA-147618ClosedLancaster, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 110
Rock-Tenn
CA
Filed 8 October 2014Case 03-CA-138351ClosedNorth Tonawanda, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2013Case 05-CA-115906ClosedWest Point, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 September 2013Case 05-CA-113160ClosedWest Point, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 500
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 15 August 2013Case 15-RC-111246ClosedCoatpoe, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 6
Included: All heavy equipment operators, mechanics, welders & laborers employed by Rock Tenn at its Chip Yard facilities located in Coatopa, Alabama Excluded: Aoo ther employees, office Clerical Employees, Managerial Employees, Guards nad Supervisors as defined in the Act.
ROCK TENN
CA
Filed 9 July 2013Case 10-CA-108720ClosedWINSTON-SALEM, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 June 2013Case 10-CA-106749ClosedWINSTON-SALEM, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 96
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 June 2013Case 10-CA-106745ClosedWINSTON-SALEM, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 96
ROCK TENN
CA
Filed 18 March 2013Case 09-CA-100616ClosedBlue Ash, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 130
ROCK TENN
CA
Filed 14 December 2012Case 09-CA-094992ClosedBLUE ASH, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 September 2012Case 13-CA-089664ClosedBridgeview, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 April 2012Case 05-CA-079984ClosedWest Point, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 650
ROCK TENN
CA
Filed 2 April 2012Case 04-CA-077958ClosedPHILADELPHIA, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 February 2012Case 07-CA-075114ClosedBattle Creek, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 105
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 September 2011Case 26-CA-063862ClosedHumboldt, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 103
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 August 2011Case 32-CA-063679ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 40
Rock-Tenn
CA
Filed 16 June 2009Case 26-CA-023435ClosedConway, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 248
Rock-Tenn
CA
Filed 5 June 2009Case 26-CA-023431ClosedConway, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 246
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 December 2008Case 16-CA-026532ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 115
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 December 2008Case 16-CA-026513ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 115
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2005Case 30-CA-017292ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 220
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 December 2002Case 16-CA-022419ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 90
Rock-Tenn
CA
Filed 23 October 2001Case 16-CA-021497ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 50

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.