Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Rogers Corporation

15 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 15 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 04 · Killingly, CT; Moosup, CT; Narragansett, RI; Newark, DE; Roger, CT; Rogers, CT

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	11
RC	Petition for an election	1
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	3

The cases

Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 13 January 2020Case 01-UC-254546ClosedNarragansett, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 135
Included: All full-time and regular part-time production, maintenance and shipping/receiving employees employed by the employer at its Narragansett, Rhode Island facility. Excluded: All other employees, managers, guards, professional employees and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 19 August 2019Case 01-RC-246785ClosedNarragansett, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 120
Included: All full time and regular part-time production, maintenance, shipping/receiving and quality assurance employees employed by the employer at its Narragansett, RI facility. Excluded: All other employees, managers, supervisors and guards as defined in the act.
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 9 October 2018Case 01-UC-228838ClosedMoosup, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 138
Included: All production and maintenance employees employed by Rogers Corporation. Excluded: Office clerical, professional and supervisory employees, and guards.
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 10 July 2018Case 01-UC-223398ClosedRogers, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 138
Included: All production and maintenance employees employed by Rogers Corporation. Excluded: Office clerical, professional and supervisory employees, and guards.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2017Case 01-CA-202555ClosedRogers, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 1,700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 March 2016Case 04-CA-172955ClosedNewark, DERegion 04Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 December 2015Case 01-CA-165937ClosedRogers, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 175
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2015Case 01-CA-147539ClosedRogers, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 175
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2013Case 01-CA-105673ClosedRogers, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 November 2010Case 34-CA-012834ClosedRoger, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2007Case 34-CA-011891ClosedRogers, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 April 2005Case 34-CA-011151ClosedRogers, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2000Case 34-CA-009117ClosedKillingly, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 1998Case 34-CA-008470ClosedRogers, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 July 1998Case 34-CA-008463ClosedRogers, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 120

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.