Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Ryder Logistics

27 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 27 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 03, 04, 07, 09, 10, 12, 13, 16, 25 · Auburn Hills, MI; BURLINGTON, KY; Burlington, KY; Dayton, OH; FORT WORTH, TX; Groveport, OH and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	25
RD	Petition to decertify	2

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 December 2025Case 04-CA-377751ClosedMorrisville, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2025Case 10-CA-371356ClosedSpring Hill, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 October 2024Case 07-CA-354330ClosedHighland Park, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 14
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 October 2023Case 12-CA-327032ClosedSouthwest Ranches, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 May 2023Case 12-CA-318840ClosedPembroke Pines, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 October 2022Case 12-CA-305023ClosedSouthwest Ranches, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2022Case 12-CA-304787ClosedSouthwest Ranches, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2022Case 03-CA-302986ClosedMiami, FLRegion 03Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 July 2022Case 12-CA-299236ClosedSouthwest Ranches, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 July 2022Case 12-CA-299203ClosedSouthwest Ranches, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2022Case 12-CA-296123ClosedSouthwest Ranches, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 March 2021Case 04-CA-273618ClosedNanticoke, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 31
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2020Case 13-CA-259619ClosedRomeoville, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
RYDER LOGISTICS
CA
Filed 19 February 2019Case 09-CA-236198ClosedBurlington, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 January 2019Case 12-CA-233490ClosedSouthwest Ranches, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 September 2018Case 12-CA-227185ClosedPembroke Pines, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 35
RYDER LOGISTICS
CA
Filed 28 November 2017Case 09-CA-210647ClosedBurlington, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
RYDER LOGISTICS
CA
Filed 20 November 2017Case 09-CA-210233ClosedDayton, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 25
RYDER LOGISTICS
CA
Filed 23 March 2016Case 09-CA-172460ClosedBURLINGTON, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 63
RYDER LOGISTICS
RD
Filed 29 October 2013Case 16-RD-115811ClosedFORT WORTH, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 30
Included: All full time warehouse associates employed at the Employer's Railhead, Meacham and Gold Spike facilities in Fort Worth including forklife operators, checker, janitors, warehouse laborers, inventory and maintenance associates. Excluded: All office clerical and confidential associates, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
RYDER LOGISTICS
RD
Filed 20 November 2012Case 16-RD-093505ClosedFORT WORTH, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 47
Included: All fulltime warehouse associaties employed at the Employer's Railhead, Meacham and Gold Spike facilities in Fort Worth including forklift operators, checkers, janitors, warehouse laborers, inventory and maintenance associates. Excluded: All office clerical and confidential associates, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
RYDER LOGISTICS
CA
Filed 26 August 2009Case 25-CA-031114ClosedPlainfield, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2008Case 01-CA-045066ClosedWoburn, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 13
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 August 2008Case 09-CA-044535ClosedMiddletown, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 August 2008Case 07-CA-051432ClosedAuburn Hills, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 August 2008Case 09-CA-044524ClosedGroveport, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 October 2007Case 16-CA-025870ClosedRoanoke, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 50

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.