Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.

203 cases in this site's copy of the record · 3 of those 203 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 05, 06, 07, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32 · Anaheim, CA; Anchorage, AK; Aurora, CO; BOSTON, MA; Bellevue, WA; Boston, MA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
AC	Petition to amend a certification	1
CA	Charge against an employer	174
RC	Petition for an election	18
RD	Petition to decertify	10

The cases

Page 2 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 April 2009Case 07-CA-051954ClosedILRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 April 2009Case 06-CA-036414ClosedChicago, ILRegion 06Workers in the unit 50
Securitas Security Services USA Inc.
CA
Filed 2 April 2009Case 01-CA-045316ClosedChicago, ILRegion 01Workers in the unit 50
Securitas Security Services, USA, Inc.
CA
Filed 9 March 2009Case 13-CA-045166ClosedLincolnshire, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2009Case 09-CA-044829ClosedDayton, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2009Case 19-CA-031728ClosedAnchorage, AKRegion 19Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 January 2009Case 12-CA-026171ClosedCrystal River, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 140
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 January 2009Case 12-CA-026162ClosedCrystal River, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 140
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2009Case 19-CA-031680ClosedAnchorage, AKRegion 19Workers in the unit 57
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 September 2008Case 19-CA-031523ClosedFife, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 September 2008Case 19-CA-031522ClosedFife, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 July 2008Case 19-CA-031475ClosedAnchorage, AKRegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 July 2008Case 34-CA-012082ClosedDanbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 9
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 July 2008Case 29-CA-029070ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 June 2008Case 19-CA-031430ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 June 2008Case 34-CA-012067ClosedDanbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 9
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 June 2008Case 19-CA-031415ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 May 2008Case 19-CA-031379ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2008Case 14-CA-029363ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 143
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 March 2008Case 19-CA-031276ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Securitas Security Services USA Inc.
CA
Filed 17 March 2008Case 07-CA-051133ClosedFlint, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 March 2008Case 18-CA-018687ClosedGolden Valley, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 March 2008Case 19-CA-031256ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 March 2008Case 19-CA-031255ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 March 2008Case 18-CA-018674ClosedGolden Valley, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 18
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2008Case 19-CA-031228ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2008Case 19-CA-031206ClosedBellevue, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 January 2008Case 19-CA-031194ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 January 2008Case 19-CA-031193ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 January 2008Case 19-CA-031175ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 November 2007Case 20-CA-033720ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2007Case 19-CA-031112ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 October 2007Case 19-CA-031103ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2007Case 20-CA-033619ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2007Case 19-CA-031070ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2007Case 32-CA-023542ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2007Case 29-CA-028524ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2007Case 19-CA-031033ClosedAnchorage, AKRegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 13 August 2007Case 11-RD-000698ClosedNew Hill, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 118
Included: All full-time and regular part-time security officers, guards and security police officers employed by the Employer at the Harris nucler Plant located in New Hill, North Carolina Excluded: All other employees, sergeants, technical employees, office clerical employees, professional employees and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 23 July 2007Case 19-RD-003768ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 22
Included: All guards employed by Securitas at APM terminal in Port of Tacoma. Excluded: All clericals, stutory supervisors, and confidential employees as defined by and in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 July 2007Case 14-CA-029026ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 June 2007Case 19-CA-030928ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 105
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2007Case 29-CA-028327ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 27
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 May 2007Case 19-CA-030871ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 110
Securitas Security Services USA Inc.
CA
Filed 25 April 2007Case 12-CA-025386ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2007Case 13-CA-043933ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2006Case 11-CA-021302ClosedChicago, ILRegion 10Workers in the unit 80
SECURITAS, SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
CA
Filed 1 August 2006Case 09-CA-042988ClosedDayton, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
SECURITAS, SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
CA
Filed 5 July 2006Case 09-CA-042941ClosedDayton, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 May 2006Case 19-CA-030322ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 25
Securitas Security Services USA Inc.
RD
Filed 4 November 2004Case 06-RD-001546ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 4
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2004Case 12-CA-024023ClosedCrystal River, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Securitas Security Services, USA, Inc.
CA
Filed 20 May 2004Case 07-CA-047511ClosedWestlake Village, CARegion 07Workers in the unit 200

Page 2 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.