Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Securitas

72 cases in this site's copy of the record · 1 of those 72 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 05, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 29, 31, 32 · Akron, OH; Anaheim, CA; Atlanta, GA; Babylon, NY; Boston, MA; Brooklyn, NY and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	66
RC	Petition for an election	3
RD	Petition to decertify	3

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2026Case 20-CA-379328OpenSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 September 2025Case 02-CA-374239ClosedManhattan, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 August 2025Case 02-CA-371660ClosedManhattan, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 August 2025Case 02-CA-371638ClosedManhattan, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10
SECURITAS
CA
Filed 17 July 2025Case 09-CA-369738ClosedGrove City, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 6 December 2024Case 02-RD-356233ClosedManhattan, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 14
Included: Security Guards Excluded: Management
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 November 2024Case 25-CA-354176ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 October 2024Case 25-CA-353306ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 August 2024Case 25-CA-348019ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 January 2024Case 13-CA-334444ClosedMerrillville, INRegion 13Workers in the unit 106
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2023Case 18-CA-328611ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 July 2022Case 18-CA-298897ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2022Case 02-CA-297301ClosedManhattan, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 March 2022Case 02-CA-293670ClosedManhattan, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2021Case 08-CA-286633ClosedToledo, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2021Case 25-CA-272416ClosedEvansville, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 August 2020Case 08-CA-264431ClosedMaumee, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 May 2020Case 32-CA-260406ClosedRichmond, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 January 2020Case 18-CA-254096ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 501
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 December 2019Case 20-CA-253110ClosedHilo, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 50
SECURITAS
CA
Filed 5 February 2019Case 18-CA-235389ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
SECURITAS
CA
Filed 20 December 2017Case 18-CA-211978ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
SECURITAS
CA
Filed 12 September 2017Case 18-CA-206164ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 October 2016Case 13-CA-185701ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2016Case 20-CA-182367ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2016Case 19-CA-182321ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 323
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 August 2013Case 13-CA-110402ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
SECURITAS
CA
Filed 12 March 2013Case 22-CA-100194ClosedJERSEY CITY, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 1,000
SECURITAS
CA
Filed 5 March 2013Case 01-CA-099640ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2012Case 13-CA-093096ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 November 2011Case 13-CA-068521ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 July 2011Case 31-CA-030296ClosedWestlake Village, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2011Case 20-CA-035608ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2011Case 36-CA-010844ClosedVancouver, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 240,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2010Case 25-CA-031712ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 December 2010Case 09-CA-046170ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2010Case 21-CA-039578ClosedAnaheim, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2010Case 14-CA-030216ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 October 2010Case 13-CA-046367ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
SECURITAS
RC
Filed 23 July 2010Case 10-RC-015796ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 325
Included All security officers performing duties in Section 9(b)(3) of the Act employed by the successor employer throughout the State of Georgia underthe contract with the Department of Homeland Security Federal Protective Services Excluded all Lieutenants and supervisors as defined by the Act, and all non-guard employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 May 2010Case 29-CA-030207ClosedStaten Island, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 March 2010Case 34-CA-012641ClosedSalem, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 170
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 March 2010Case 14-CA-030061ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 147
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2009Case 20-CA-034803ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2009Case 20-CA-034802ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2009Case 20-CA-034801ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2009Case 20-CA-034800ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2009Case 14-CA-029914ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 143
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 September 2009Case 05-CA-035293ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 August 2009Case 21-CA-038960ClosedSanta Ana, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 43
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 9 June 2009Case 19-RC-015217ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 25
Included: All full time and regular part time Security Officers (Guards) assigned to work at the APM Terminal and Horizon Terminal in Tacoma, Washington. Excluded: All office, clerical employees, professional employees, managers, supervisors as defined by the National Labor Relations Act, as well as any temporarily assigned employees or substitute employees as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 December 2008Case 29-CA-029342ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 November 2008Case 07-CA-051665ClosedPontiac, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 12
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 28 October 2008Case 29-RD-001122ClosedBabylon, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 32
All full-time and regualar part-time guards. All other employees, including office clerical workers and supervisors defined in Secion 2(11) of the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 February 2008Case 32-CA-023763ClosedCampbell, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2008Case 14-CA-029213ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 143
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 August 2007Case 13-CA-044192ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 9
SECURITAS
CA
Filed 3 August 2007Case 25-CA-030406ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 July 2007Case 14-CA-029027ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 May 2007Case 07-CA-050393ClosedWarren, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2007Case 31-CA-028111ClosedVan Nuys, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 November 2006Case 13-CA-043712ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 18 May 2005Case 19-RD-003673ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 21
Included: All full-time and regular part-time security guards, bus drivers, clerical, control room operators, pedestrian gate, and main gate employees empoyed by the Employer. Excluded: All shift leaders, site supervisors, and guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 March 2005Case 19-CA-029679ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 February 2005Case 08-CA-035635ClosedAkron, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 25
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 1 October 2004Case 12-RC-009082ClosedChicago, ILRegion 12Workers in the unit 12
Included: All full time and/or regular part time alarm station operator sergeants performing guard duties as defined in section 9(b)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended employed by Securitas @ Crystal River Nuclear, Crystal River, Floirda. Excluded: All office clerical employees, professional employees, supervisors, as defined in the act, as amended, and all other employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 September 2004Case 18-CA-017407ClosedRoseville, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 November 2002Case 13-CA-040658ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2002Case 13-CA-040165ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2002Case 18-CA-016342ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2002Case 13-CA-039988ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 January 2002Case 13-CA-039949ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 300

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.