Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Shamrock Foods Company

17 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 17 are marked open by the Board · Region 21, 27, 28 · EASTVALE, CA; Meridian, ID; Phoenix, AZ

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	15
RC	Petition for an election	1
RD	Petition to decertify	1

The cases

Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 7 December 2020Case 27-RD-269810ClosedMeridian, IDRegion 27Workers in the unit 37
Include: Truck drivers and transportation department employees. Exclude: Supervisors, managers, confidential employees and mechanics
SHAMROCK FOODS COMPANY
RC
Filed 6 September 2016Case 21-RC-183691ClosedEASTVALE, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 96
Included: All regular full time and regular part time drivers working out of the Employer's facilities located at: 1) 12400 Riverside Drive, Eastvale, CA 91752; 2) 8823 Millergrove Dr., Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670; 3) 1101 W. San Marcos Bl., San Marcos, CA 9078; 4) 4711 Marriott Dr., Bakersfield, CA 93308; and 5) 3702 Losee Road, N. Las Vegas, NV 89030 Excluded: All other employees including office clerical ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 2016Case 28-CA-182541ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 August 2016Case 28-CA-181714ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2016Case 28-CA-179231ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 June 2016Case 28-CA-178621ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 May 2016Case 28-CA-177035ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 May 2016Case 28-CA-175800ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 March 2016Case 28-CA-171380ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2016Case 28-CA-171042ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 2016Case 28-CA-169970ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2016Case 28-CA-167910ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 December 2015Case 28-CA-165951ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 October 2015Case 28-CA-162851ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2015Case 28-CA-161831ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 September 2015Case 28-CA-160100ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2015Case 28-CA-150157ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 1,000

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.