Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.

36 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 36 are marked open by the Board · Region 01 · East Bridgewater, MA; Methuen, MA; South Easton, MA; WELLS, ME; Wareham, MA; West Bridgewater, MA

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	35
RC	Petition for an election	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2022Case 01-CA-306550ClosedMethuen, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
SHAW'S SUPERMARKETS, INC.
CA
Filed 12 December 2014Case 01-CA-142753ClosedWELLS, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 100
SHAW'S SUPERMARKETS, INC.
CA
Filed 12 November 2013Case 01-CA-116846ClosedEast Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
SHAW'S SUPERMARKETS, INC.
CA
Filed 4 January 2012Case 01-CA-071849ClosedEast Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2010Case 01-CA-046283ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 July 2010Case 01-CA-046251ClosedSouth Easton, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 July 2010Case 01-CA-046243ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 May 2010Case 01-CA-046134ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 April 2010Case 01-CA-046115ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 March 2010Case 01-CA-046046ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 March 2010Case 01-CA-046017ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2009Case 01-CA-045675ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 September 2009Case 01-CA-045660ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 September 2009Case 01-CA-045659ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2009Case 01-CA-045477ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2009Case 01-CA-045476ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 June 2009Case 01-CA-045459ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2009Case 01-CA-045422ClosedEast Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 600
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 8 May 2009Case 01-RC-022320ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 130
Included: All full time and regular part time employees, including per diem employees who average at least 4 hours/week over the 90 days preceeding the cut-off date for the election employed by the Employer at its supermarket located at 1150 Eastman Road, Center Conway, New Hampshire 03813 Excluded: Managers, supervisors, confidential employees, security guards
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 May 2009Case 01-CA-045399ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 June 2008Case 01-CA-044731ClosedEast Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 June 2008Case 01-CA-044730ClosedEast Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2005Case 01-CA-042773ClosedWareham, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2003Case 01-CA-041391ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 November 2003Case 01-CA-041382ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 August 2003Case 01-CA-041201ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 August 2002Case 01-CA-040139ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2002Case 01-CA-039972ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2002Case 01-CA-039971ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 March 2002Case 01-CA-039764ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2002Case 01-CA-039718ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 December 2001Case 01-CA-039568ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 July 2001Case 01-CA-039200ClosedEast Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 6,750
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2001Case 34-CA-009701ClosedWest Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2000Case 01-CA-038399ClosedEast Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 1999Case 01-CA-037499ClosedEast Bridgewater, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 15,000

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.