Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Starbucks Coffee Company

30 cases in this site's copy of the record · 4 of those 30 are marked open by the Board · Region 02, 04, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 · Asbury Park, NJ; Atlanta, GA; Bloomington, MN; Bossier City, LA; Bradenton, FL; Cornelius, NC and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

This name is gathered, along with others, on the Starbucks page.

The Board has also spelled this name Starbucks Coffee Co. (2), Starbucks Coffee Corporation (4), Starbucks Coffee (1). Every spelling of this name.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	27
RD	Petition to decertify	3

The cases

Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 21 September 2026Case 12-RD-395389OpenOviedo, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 28
Included: Food, beverages, retail Excluded: Alcohol, clothing
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2026Case 20-CA-394693OpenSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 13
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 18 August 2026Case 16-RD-393059OpenSan Antonio, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 14
Included: All full-time and regular part-time Baristas and shift Supervisors Employed by the Employer at its 200 E. Houston Street, San Antonio, TX 78205 Facility. Excluded: Official Clerical Employees, Store managers, Professional Employees, Guards, and Supervisors as Defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 June 2025Case 02-CA-368071OpenNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 September 2023Case 12-CA-325061ClosedBradenton, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2023Case 21-CA-322590ClosedSan Marcos, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 48
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 July 2023Case 12-CA-321578ClosedBradenton, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2023Case 10-CA-315402ClosedCornelius, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 25
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 18 October 2022Case 14-RD-305461ClosedNichols Hills, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 30
All full-time and regular part-time hourly Baristas and Shift Supervisors employed by the Employer at 1123 NW 63rd Ave., Oklahoma City, OK 73116 (Store 6490 - often referred to as “Nichols Hills”) but excluding all Store Managers, office clerical employees, professional employees, guards, and supervisors as defined by the Act, and all other employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 April 2022Case 14-CA-294548ClosedLees Summit, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 February 2022Case 14-CA-290947ClosedLees Summit, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 March 2020Case 04-CA-258416ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 14
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2020Case 04-CA-257024ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 February 2020Case 04-CA-256671ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 February 2020Case 04-CA-256656ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 February 2020Case 04-CA-256401ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 16
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 February 2020Case 04-CA-256399ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 February 2020Case 04-CA-256398ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 February 2020Case 04-CA-256390ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 16
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 January 2020Case 04-CA-254174ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 November 2019Case 04-CA-252338ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 16
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 April 2011Case 15-CA-019989ClosedBossier City, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2010Case 10-CA-038665ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 July 2010Case 17-CA-024894ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 January 2009Case 18-CA-018962ClosedBloomington, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 January 2009Case 18-CA-018944ClosedBloomington, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2008Case 22-CA-028610ClosedAsbury Park, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 March 2008Case 18-CA-018699ClosedEagan, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 50,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 July 2006Case 18-CA-018097ClosedEagan, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 21
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2001Case 19-CA-027496ClosedKent, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 175

Last refreshed 22 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.