Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

The Boeing Company

299 cases in this site's copy of the record · 11 of those 299 are marked open by the Board · Region 04, 10, 14, 16, 19, 20, 21, 27, 28, 31, 32 · AFB, Edwards, CA; Algona, WA; Anaheim, CA; Auburn, WA; CHARLESTON, SC; Charleston, SC and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	269
RC	Petition for an election	15
RD	Petition to decertify	8
RM	Petition filed by an employer	4
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	3

The cases

Page 2 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 April 2016Case 19-CA-174906ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 April 2016Case 19-CA-173301ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 March 2016Case 19-CA-172334ClosedAuburn, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 9,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 18 March 2016Case 28-RC-172114ClosedYuma, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 12
Included: All full time and Aircraft Mechanics. Excluded: Office clerk employees, professional employees, managerial employees, guards, supervisors and other employees as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2016Case 19-CA-167570ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50,000
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 11 December 2015Case 19-RD-165896ClosedRenton, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Included: All full-time and regular part-time pilots employed by the Employer in Instructor Pilot positions with flying duties and requiring a current FAA pilot certificate who are employed at the Longacres Training Center located at 1301SW16th Street, Renton, Washington, and all full-time and. regular part-time standards pilots, safety pilots, technical pilots, and simulator-only pilots/instructors employed by the ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2015Case 10-CA-165431ClosedNorth Charleston, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 October 2015Case 19-CA-162857ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 September 2015Case 19-CA-159841ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 160,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2015Case 31-CA-159138ClosedEl Segundo, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 August 2015Case 19-CA-158939ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 April 2015Case 10-CA-151396ClosedNorth Charleston, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 April 2015Case 19-CA-150558ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 22,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 April 2015Case 10-CA-150341ClosedNorth Charleston, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 3,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 16 March 2015Case 10-RC-148171ClosedNorth Charleston, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 2,500
Included: All hourly employees involved in aircraft assembly at the Main Campus (North Charleston) and all hourly fabrication employees at the IRC (Interiors) facility (Ladson). Excluded: All office clerical employees, professional employees, managerial employees, temporary employees, contractors, guards and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2015Case 19-CA-147636ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 January 2015Case 04-CA-145478ClosedRidley Park, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 100
THE BOEING COMPANY
CA
Filed 4 September 2014Case 21-CA-136064ClosedLONG BEACH, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 August 2014Case 19-CA-135714ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 August 2014Case 19-CA-135406ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 22,000
THE BOEING COMPANY
CA
Filed 18 July 2014Case 21-CA-133179ClosedLONG BEACH, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,050
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 July 2014Case 19-CA-132858ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 22,000
THE BOEING COMPANY
CA
Filed 9 July 2014Case 21-CA-132446ClosedLONG BEACH, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,000
THE BOEING COMPANY
CA
Filed 9 July 2014Case 21-CA-132445ClosedLONG BEACH, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2014Case 19-CA-130052ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 168,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2014Case 19-CA-128941ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2014Case 19-CA-128328ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 22,000
THE BOEING COMPANY
CA
Filed 17 April 2014Case 21-CA-126929ClosedLONG BEACH, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,050
THE BOEING COMPANY
CA
Filed 17 April 2014Case 21-CA-126928ClosedLONG BEACH, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,050
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 April 2014Case 19-CA-126391ClosedEVERETT, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2014Case 19-CA-123314ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 8,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 2014Case 19-CA-122798ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 February 2014Case 19-CA-122678ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2014Case 19-CA-122524ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 48,000
THE BOEING COMPANY
CA
Filed 6 February 2014Case 21-CA-122108ClosedHUNTINGTON BEACH, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2014Case 19-CA-122009ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 32,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2014Case 19-CA-120705ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 32,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2014Case 19-CA-120695ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 32,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2014Case 19-CA-120665ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2014Case 19-CA-120664ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2014Case 19-CA-120662ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2014Case 19-CA-120624ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 January 2014Case 19-CA-120303ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 January 2014Case 19-CA-120281ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 January 2014Case 19-CA-120213ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 32,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2013Case 19-CA-114983ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 5,000
THE BOEING COMPANY
RC
Filed 13 September 2013Case 19-RC-113247ClosedSEATTLE, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 2
all full-time and regular part-time employees performing the work of product review engineers with Boeing Commercial Airplanes employed by the EMployer at its Miami, Florida location. Excluding all other employees and guards and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 May 2013Case 19-CA-104449ClosedSEATTLE, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 21,002
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 March 2013Case 19-CA-101061ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2013Case 19-CA-098292ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 21,002
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 January 2013Case 19-CA-097370ClosedRenton, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 January 2013Case 19-CA-096578ClosedRenton, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 January 2013Case 19-CA-095926ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 21,002
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 December 2012Case 14-CA-095034ClosedTulsa, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 November 2012Case 19-CA-093656ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 21,002
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 November 2012Case 21-CA-093678ClosedHuntington Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2012Case 19-CA-090948ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 21,002
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2012Case 19-CA-090932ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 21,002
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 September 2012Case 19-CA-089847ClosedAuburn, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 September 2012Case 19-CA-089374ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 August 2012Case 19-CA-088157ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 21,002
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 2012Case 19-CA-087902ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 August 2012Case 19-CA-087860ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 July 2012Case 19-CA-086035ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2012Case 14-CA-079843ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 501
THE BOEING COMPANY
CA
Filed 3 April 2012Case 11-CA-077979ClosedCHARLESTON, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 1,600
The BOEING COMPANY
RC
Filed 19 January 2012Case 27-RC-072750ClosedMountain Home, IDRegion 27Workers in the unit 6
Including: All full-time and regular part-time Air Crew Training Device Instructors. Excluded: Office clerk employees, professional employees, manageral employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
THE BOEING COMPANY
RC
Filed 6 January 2012Case 19-RC-071950ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 30
Included: (a) Those full time & regular part time employees performing the work of Standards, Safety and Technical Pilots (job code: ADPX) employed by the Employer. (b) Those full time and regular part time Simulator-Only instuctors working in Flight Training-Simulator in the State of Washington. Petitioner seeks an Armour-Globe election in which members of the voting group can choose to join the bargaining unit ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 December 2011Case 14-CA-070442ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 18,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 14 July 2011Case 19-RC-015419ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
INCLUDED: All full-time and regualr part-time employees performing the work of Field Service Representatives within Boeing Commercial Airlines working within the United States. Petitioner seeks an Armour-Globe election in which members of the above voting group can choose to join the professional bargaining unit now described in sections l.l (a) and (e) of the Professional Collective Bargaining Agreement, dated ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 April 2011Case 21-CA-039778ClosedHuntington Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 April 2011Case 10-CA-038921ClosedHuntsville, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 3,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 3 January 2011Case 19-RC-015372ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Included: Those full time and regular part time employees performing the work of Field Service Representatives within Boeing Commercial Airlines working within the United States. Petitioner seeks an Armour-Globe election in which members of the above voting group can choose to join the professional bargaining unit now described in Section 1.1(a) of the Professional Collective Bargaining Agreement dated December 2, ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2010Case 21-CA-039588ClosedLong Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,735
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 September 2010Case 19-CA-032730ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 40
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 24 August 2010Case 16-RD-001603ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 3
INCLUDED: All production and maintenance employees including operating and test employees, inspectors, warehouse employes and leads. EXCLUDED: Office employees, plant clerical, professionaland technical employoyees, chauffeurs, salary payroll employees, guards and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 June 2010Case 21-CA-039400ClosedLong Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,742
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 15 June 2010Case 36-RC-006487ClosedKlamath Falls, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 4
All full-time and part-time Simulator Technicians I, II, III and IV located at the employer's facility at 245 Vandenberg Drive "Kingsley Field", Klamath Falls, OR 97603; excluding office clerk employees, professional employees, managerial employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2010Case 21-CA-039320ClosedLong Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2010Case 19-CA-032431ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 February 2010Case 19-CA-032359ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 21,002
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 2 November 2009Case 19-RC-015256ClosedMcChord AFB, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 18
Included: All full-time and regular part-time AOG Aircraft Mechanics employed by BAO at McChord Air Force Base. Excluded: Clerical employees, managerial employees, statutory supervisors, guards and all other employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2009Case 19-CA-032152ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2009Case 19-CA-032092ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 30 July 2009Case 11-RD-000723ClosedCharleston, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 10
Included All production andmaintenance employees, including assmeblers, tool and die toolmakers, inspectors, bonders, millwrights, operators, maintenance mechanics, and NDI technicians. Excluded All other employees, including all office clerical employees, managerial employees, guards, professional employees and supervisors under the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 May 2009Case 19-CA-031942ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2009Case 04-CA-036780ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 5,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 April 2009Case 04-CA-036697ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 March 2009Case 36-CA-010441ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 20 February 2009Case 20-RC-018230ClosedTravis Afb, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 17
All full-time and regular part-time pilot instructors, loadmaster instructors, simulator maintenance technicians, schedulers, and administrative specialists employed by the Employer at its operations located at Travis Air Force Base, California. Excluded: Parts Office clerical employees, professional employees, managerial employees, guards and supervisors, as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 February 2009Case 17-CA-024404ClosedWichita, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 2,800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 December 2008Case 19-CA-031641ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 October 2008Case 19-CA-031567ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 25,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2008Case 27-CA-021012ClosedClearfield, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 200,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 July 2008Case 04-CA-036270ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 July 2008Case 04-CA-036269ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 July 2008Case 04-CA-036268ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 June 2008Case 04-CA-036182ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 4,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 May 2008Case 19-CA-031383ClosedAuburn, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 May 2008Case 19-CA-031381ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 144,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 April 2008Case 27-CA-020859ClosedClearfield, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 200,000
Petition filed by an employer
RM
Filed 8 April 2008Case 31-RM-001290ClosedPalmdale, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 63
Included: All professional engineering employees in the post-acquisition/post-merger combined engineering operations at AFB, Edwards and Palmdale, California Excluded:All other employees and all guards and supervisors as defined by the National :Labor Relations Act.
Petition filed by an employer
RM
Filed 8 April 2008Case 31-RM-001289ClosedAFB, Edwards, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 151
Included: All professional engineering employees in the post-acquisition/post-merger combined engineering operations at AFB, Edwards and Palmdale, California Excluded:All other employees and all guards and supervisors as defined by the National :Labor Relations Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 April 2008Case 04-CA-036067ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 4,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2008Case 19-CA-031261ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 October 2007Case 19-CA-031096ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 October 2007Case 21-CA-038058ClosedAnaheim, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 120
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 21 September 2007Case 21-RD-002839ClosedLong Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 22
Included All employees in the classifications of the Shared Services Group – Southern California at Boeing Commercial Airplane – Long Beach, previously known as Douglas Products Division and Integrated Defense Systems, previously known as Military Aircraft and Missile Systems as were certified by the National Labor Relations Board in Case 21-RC-19052, or as agreed upon between the Company and the Union to be ...
Petition filed by an employer
RM
Filed 14 September 2007Case 27-RM-000679ClosedOgden, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 101
Included: All engineering employees of the Company in the post-acquisition, combined engineering operations at the Company plants located in Weber and Davis counties, Uah. Excluded: All other employees and all guards and supervisors as defined by the National Labor Relations Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2007Case 19-CA-031048ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 144,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 September 2007Case 19-CA-031044ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 144,000
Petition filed by an employer
RM
Filed 20 August 2007Case 27-RM-000678ClosedOgden, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 101
Included: All engineering employees of the Company in the post-acquisistion, combined engineering operations at the Company plants located in Weber and Davis Counties, UT. Excluded: All other employees and all guards and supervisors as defined by the Nationa Labor Relations Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 July 2007Case 21-CA-037872ClosedLong Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 150,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 June 2007Case 19-CA-030909ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 5
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 27 April 2007Case 17-RD-001755ClosedWichita, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 930
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 April 2007Case 21-CA-037756ClosedLong Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 8,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 April 2007Case 21-CA-037755ClosedLong Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 2,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 March 2007Case 19-CA-030745ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 144,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 November 2006Case 19-CA-030611ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 144,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 October 2006Case 04-CA-034980ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2006Case 17-CA-023626ClosedWichita, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2006Case 04-CA-034494ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2006Case 17-CA-023419ClosedWichita, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 8,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 December 2005Case 17-CA-023358ClosedWichita, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 10,000
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 8 April 2005Case 31-UC-000311ClosedPalmdale, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 11
Included: See Attached Excluded: See Attached
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2004Case 17-CA-022613ClosedWichita, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 144,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 January 2004Case 17-CA-022562ClosedWichita, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 12,339
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 9 December 2003Case 17-RD-001686ClosedWichita, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 3,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2003Case 17-CA-022368ClosedWichita, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 146,217
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 June 2003Case 19-CA-028752ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 80,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2003Case 19-CA-028587ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 160,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 February 2003Case 19-CA-028481ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2002Case 21-CA-035254ClosedHuntington Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 6,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 June 2002Case 21-CA-035204ClosedLong Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 April 2002Case 21-CA-035087ClosedHuntington Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 November 2001Case 17-CA-021427ClosedWichita, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 18,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 October 2001Case 19-CA-027791ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 April 2001Case 19-CA-027482ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 April 2001Case 19-CA-027481ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 2000Case 19-CA-027119ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 1,000
THE BOEING COMPANY
CA
Filed 13 April 2000Case 21-CA-033926ClosedLONG BEACH, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 12,000
THE BOEING COMPANY
CA
Filed 27 October 1999Case 21-CA-033581ClosedLONG BEACH, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 July 1999Case 21-CA-033421ClosedHuntington Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 8,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 July 1999Case 14-CA-025655ClosedHazelwood, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 20,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 1999Case 17-CA-020214ClosedWichita, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 June 1999Case 36-CA-008483ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 2,000
THE BOEING COMPANY
CA
Filed 30 April 1999Case 21-CA-033294ClosedLONG BEACH, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 40
THE BOEING COMPANY
CA
Filed 17 March 1999Case 21-CA-033233ClosedHuntington Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 October 1998Case 17-CA-019912ClosedWichita, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 5,000

Page 2 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.