Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

The Brooklyn Hospital Center

40 cases in this site's copy of the record · 2 of those 40 are marked open by the Board · Region 29 · BROOKLYN, NY; Brooklyn, NY

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	37
RC	Petition for an election	2
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2026Case 29-CA-383032OpenBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 485
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2026Case 29-CA-381784ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 485
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 December 2025Case 29-CA-376934ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 December 2024Case 29-CA-356435ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 3,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 12 February 2024Case 29-RC-335631ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 11
Included: All full-time, part-time, and per diem nurse educators residual to the existing unit of registered nurses represented by the New York State Nurses Association employed by the Employer at its facility located at 121 Dekalb Avenue, Brooklyn NY 11201. Excluded: All other employees, guards, supervisors, and confidential employees as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 October 2023Case 29-CA-327918ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 March 2022Case 29-CA-293250OpenBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2022Case 29-CA-288739ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2021Case 29-CA-283184ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 February 2020Case 29-CA-255675ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2018Case 29-CA-216864ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
THE BROOKLYN HOSPITAL CENTER
CA
Filed 15 May 2017Case 29-CA-198844ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 8 March 2017Case 29-RC-194449ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 26
Included: All full time and part time security officers. Excluded: All other employees as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2016Case 29-CA-187327ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 September 2016Case 29-CA-183538ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2016Case 29-CA-174292ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 June 2015Case 29-CA-154841ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 September 2013Case 29-CA-113246ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2011Case 29-CA-067352ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 August 2011Case 29-CA-063131ClosedBROOKLYN, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 August 2011Case 29-CA-062248ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2011Case 29-CA-030921ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2011Case 29-CA-030732ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 July 2010Case 29-CA-030331ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 April 2010Case 29-CA-030195ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 April 2010Case 29-CA-030194ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2010Case 29-CA-030057ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2010Case 29-CA-030018ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2009Case 29-CA-029881ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 December 2008Case 29-CA-029323ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 November 2008Case 29-CA-029288ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 31 December 2007Case 29-UC-000558ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 38
Included: All full time and regular part time employees in the Engineering & Biomedical Engineering Departments Excluded: supervisors confidential & all other employees
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2007Case 29-CA-028445ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 January 2007Case 29-CA-028139ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2006Case 29-CA-027369ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2005Case 29-CA-026737ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 December 2004Case 29-CA-026681ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 October 2004Case 29-CA-026598ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2004Case 29-CA-026597ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 January 1998Case 29-CA-021694ClosedBROOKLYN, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.