Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

The Kroger Company

97 cases in this site's copy of the record · 6 of those 97 are marked open by the Board · Region 05, 07, 08, 09, 10, 14, 15, 16, 25 · Atlanta, GA; Birmingham, MI; Bourbonnais, IL; CINCINNATI, OH; Charleston, WV; Cincinnati, OH and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	95
RC	Petition for an election	2

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2026Case 08-CA-391844OpenTiffin, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2026Case 08-CA-391839OpenToledo, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 10
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 23 December 2025Case 09-CA-378131OpenLockbourne, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 175
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 November 2025Case 25-CA-375444OpenIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 8,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 September 2025Case 25-CA-372734ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 8,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 July 2024Case 07-CA-346930OpenLambertville, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 328
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 June 2024Case 25-CA-344678ClosedFishers, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 100
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 11 June 2024Case 09-CA-344297ClosedColumbus, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 25
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 26 January 2024Case 09-CA-334950OpenCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 December 2023Case 07-CA-332859ClosedBirmingham, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 105
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 11 August 2023Case 09-CA-325922ClosedFlorence, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 19 July 2023Case 09-CA-323002ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 11,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 June 2023Case 25-CA-320694ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 465,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 April 2023Case 25-CA-316212ClosedPeoria, ILRegion 25Workers in the unit 465,000
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 14 April 2023Case 09-CA-316680ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 10,000
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 28 December 2022Case 09-CA-309576ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 11,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 5 May 2022Case 07-RC-295305ClosedSaginaw, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 9
Included: All Full-Time and Part-Time Pharmacy Clerks. Excluded: Supervisors, Managers and Guards.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2021Case 08-CA-273348ClosedToledo, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2020Case 07-CA-261023ClosedRichmond, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 240
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2020Case 07-CA-260745ClosedHazel Park, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 February 2020Case 07-CA-256148ClosedLambertville, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2019Case 08-CA-246505ClosedMansfield, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 3
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 April 2019Case 07-CA-240208ClosedYpsilanti, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 March 2019Case 15-CA-237979ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 May 2018Case 07-CA-219770ClosedNovi, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 15,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2018Case 07-CA-217203ClosedMilford, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 January 2018Case 07-CA-213175ClosedWaterford, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 July 2017Case 07-CA-202611ClosedFarmington, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2016Case 07-CA-169341ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 07Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 January 2016Case 07-CA-167134ClosedWesterville, OHRegion 07Workers in the unit 15,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2015Case 10-CA-165581ClosedNashville, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 375,000
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 23 November 2015Case 09-CA-164866ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 70
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 August 2015Case 07-CA-158631ClosedNovi, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 16,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2015Case 07-CA-153646ClosedNovi, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 15,500
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 22 May 2015Case 09-CA-152852ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 70
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 29 January 2015Case 07-RC-145351ClosedNovi, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 36
Included: All pharmacy technicians employed in the New Market Division of The Kroger Company within the jurisdiction of UFCW Local 876 Excluded: Guards, supervisors as defined in the Act and all others
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 10 October 2014Case 09-CA-138635ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 12,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2014Case 07-CA-138221ClosedNovi, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 14,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2014Case 07-CA-131906ClosedRedford, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2014Case 08-CA-127813ClosedDelaware, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 850
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 April 2014Case 07-CA-127348ClosedLansing, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 112
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 20 February 2014Case 15-CA-123042ClosedMEMPHIS, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 November 2013Case 07-CA-116771ClosedSturgis, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 August 2013Case 07-CA-111545ClosedNovi, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 August 2013Case 07-CA-111518ClosedNovi, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2013Case 08-CA-111171ClosedWesterville, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2013Case 07-CA-106579ClosedHarper Woods, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 140
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 April 2013Case 15-CA-101764ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 100
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 1 April 2013Case 09-CA-101584ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 March 2013Case 07-CA-101365ClosedLivonia, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 March 2013Case 15-CA-101047ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 7,000
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 27 February 2013Case 15-CA-099229ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 October 2012Case 07-CA-092291ClosedNovi, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 28 September 2012Case 25-CA-090185ClosedINDIANAPOLIS, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 September 2012Case 07-CA-088749ClosedNovi, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 August 2012Case 05-CA-087717ClosedRichmond, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 7,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 August 2012Case 05-CA-087523ClosedRichmond, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 7,500
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 15 June 2012Case 25-CA-083151ClosedINDIANAPOLIS, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 9,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 June 2012Case 07-CA-083200ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2012Case 10-CA-082496ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2012Case 25-CA-081589ClosedMorton, ILRegion 25Workers in the unit 300,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2012Case 14-CA-077489ClosedBourbonnais, ILRegion 14Workers in the unit 117
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 23 February 2012Case 09-CA-075196ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 February 2012Case 07-CA-075046ClosedNovi, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 9 February 2012Case 09-CA-074172ClosedLOUISVILLE, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 11,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2011Case 09-CA-067300ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 210
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 5 October 2011Case 09-CA-066191ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 August 2011Case 11-CA-063216ClosedRoanoke, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 August 2011Case 14-CA-062722ClosedBourbonnais, ILRegion 14Workers in the unit 117
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 28 July 2011Case 05-CA-061819ClosedRICHMOND, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2011Case 07-CA-053590ClosedNovi, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 13,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2011Case 07-CA-053531ClosedNovi, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 13,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 October 2010Case 10-CA-038644ClosedFayetteville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2010Case 09-CA-046003ClosedDunbar, WVRegion 09Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2010Case 25-CA-031480ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2009Case 11-CA-022439ClosedRoanoke, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2009Case 09-CA-044989ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2009Case 26-CA-023409ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 8,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 April 2009Case 26-CA-023392ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 8,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 May 2008Case 26-CA-023055ClosedNashville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 December 2007Case 08-CA-037558ClosedToledo, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,900
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 26 October 2007Case 09-CA-043959ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 11,000
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 12 July 2007Case 09-CA-043709ClosedDayton, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2007Case 08-CA-037259ClosedToledo, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2007Case 08-CA-037258ClosedToledo, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 June 2007Case 08-CA-037239ClosedToledo, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,900
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 13 March 2007Case 09-CA-043484ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 March 2007Case 08-CA-037070ClosedWestfield, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,900
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 30 January 2007Case 09-CA-043433ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 December 2006Case 08-CA-036921ClosedMansfield, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 July 2006Case 08-CA-036679ClosedToledo, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,818
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 17 January 2006Case 09-CA-042576ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 12
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 22 April 2004Case 09-CA-041058ClosedHuber Heights, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 75
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 20 August 2003Case 25-CA-028839ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 105
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 11 July 2002Case 09-CA-039436ClosedHuntington, WVRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 March 1998Case 16-CA-019195ClosedHOUSTON, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 18,000
THE KROGER COMPANY
CA
Filed 16 September 1997Case 09-CA-035302ClosedCharleston, WVRegion 09Workers in the unit 200

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.