Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company

17 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 17 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 29 · Boston, MA; Branford, CT; Bridgeport, CT; Farmingdale, NY; Farmington, CT; Hartford, CT and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

The Board has also spelled this name Stop and Shop Supermarket Company (11), Stop & Shop Supermarket Company, LLC (7), Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. (4), The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LLC (6), Stop & Shop Supermarket (6), Stop & Shop Supermarket LLC (2), STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET CO LLC (3), Stop & Shop Supermarket Inc. (1). Every spelling of this name.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	17

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 October 2023Case 29-CA-327666ClosedFarmingdale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 February 2007Case 34-CA-011697ClosedFarmington, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 5,000
THE STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET COMPANY
CA
Filed 13 February 2007Case 34-CA-011687ClosedMystic, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 5,000
THE STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET COMPANY
CA
Filed 13 February 2007Case 34-CA-011686ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2007Case 34-CA-011685ClosedFarmington, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2007Case 34-CA-011696ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2007Case 01-CA-043767ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 February 2007Case 34-CA-011695ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 February 2007Case 01-CA-043766ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 February 2007Case 34-CA-011694ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 February 2007Case 34-CA-011675ClosedFarmington, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 February 2007Case 01-CA-043762ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 May 2005Case 34-CA-011175ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 May 2005Case 34-CA-011174ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 July 2003Case 34-CA-010533ClosedBridgeport, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 2,800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 July 2003Case 34-CA-010532ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 9,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 November 2002Case 34-CA-010305ClosedBranford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100

Last refreshed 22 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.