Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Time Warner Cable

70 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 70 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 03, 06, 08, 09, 10, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, 28, 29, 31 · Akron, OH; Austin, TX; Ballston Spa, NY; Brooklyn, NY; Buffalo, NY; Butler, PA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	64
RC	Petition for an election	1
RD	Petition to decertify	5

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2016Case 29-CA-185167ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 3,000
TIME WARNER CABLE
CA
Filed 28 July 2016Case 01-CA-181103ClosedPITTSFIELD, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 July 2016Case 29-CA-180230ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 3,000
TIME WARNER CABLE
CA
Filed 18 February 2016Case 01-CA-170047ClosedPittsfield, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2016Case 29-CA-169200ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 5
TIME WARNER CABLE
CA
Filed 15 July 2015Case 01-CA-156001ClosedPITTSFIELD, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
TIME WARNER CABLE
CA
Filed 29 May 2015Case 02-CA-153240ClosedNEW YORK, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2015Case 02-CA-152655ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 May 2015Case 02-CA-151838ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 April 2015Case 02-CA-149744ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 2015Case 03-CA-149062ClosedBuffalo, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 8
TIME WARNER CABLE
CA
Filed 24 February 2015Case 01-CA-147029ClosedPITTSFIELD, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 December 2014Case 28-CA-142110ClosedEl Paso, TXRegion 28Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 June 2014Case 02-CA-131456ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 June 2014Case 28-CA-131119ClosedEl Paso, TXRegion 28Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 May 2014Case 28-CA-128538ClosedEl Paso, TXRegion 28Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 April 2014Case 02-CA-127152ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,600
TIME WARNER CABLE
CA
Filed 9 April 2014Case 02-CA-126154ClosedNEW YORK, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,600
TIME WARNER CABLE
CA
Filed 2 April 2014Case 02-CA-125694ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 March 2014Case 29-CA-125192ClosedQueens, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2013Case 02-CA-113342ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2013Case 29-CA-113095ClosedJamaica, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
TIME WARNER CABLE
CA
Filed 10 September 2013Case 02-CA-113026ClosedNEW YORK, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,500
TIME WARNER CABLE
CA
Filed 6 September 2013Case 22-CA-112702ClosedPALISADES PARK, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 32
TIME WARNER CABLE
RD
Filed 3 January 2013Case 22-RD-095758ClosedPALISADES PARK, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 29
Inc. Technicians in all area, Dispatch, Warehouse, Business Service , Construction, Headend.. Exc. Managers, guards and supervisors as defined in the act...
TIME WARNER CABLE
RD
Filed 30 April 2012Case 22-RD-079886ClosedPALISADES PARK, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 30
INC. TECHICIANS & DISPATCHERS.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 April 2012Case 03-CA-078865ClosedEast Syracuse, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 February 2012Case 21-CA-075300ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2010Case 30-CA-018834ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 September 2010Case 16-CA-027614ClosedAustin, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 100,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 August 2010Case 02-CA-040053ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 May 2010Case 16-CA-027428ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2010Case 29-CA-030166ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2010Case 29-CA-030165ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 March 2010Case 16-CA-027364ClosedAustin, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 March 2010Case 29-CA-030142ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 February 2010Case 29-CA-030061ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2010Case 29-CA-030062ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 December 2009Case 29-CA-029963ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2009Case 11-CA-022303ClosedWest columbia, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2009Case 16-CA-026588ClosedAustin, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 January 2009Case 16-CA-026548ClosedAustin, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 October 2008Case 01-CA-045033ClosedPortland, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2008Case 01-CA-045031ClosedPortland, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 August 2008Case 02-CA-038920ClosedCharlotte, NCRegion 02Workers in the unit 5,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 23 June 2008Case 11-RC-006702ClosedWake Forest, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 29
INC: Installation Technicians, Service Technicians, Maintenance Technicians. EXC: Profession and managerial employees, customer service employees, guards, office clerical, supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2008Case 08-CA-037788ClosedWarren, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 37
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 April 2008Case 08-CA-037706ClosedWarren, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 37
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 July 2007Case 29-CA-028406ClosedCollege Point, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 July 2007Case 29-CA-028374ClosedCollege Point, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 20 June 2007Case 03-RD-001521ClosedUtica, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 33
Included: All hourly employees Excluded: Guards and Supervisors as defined in the Act
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 May 2007Case 03-CA-026325ClosedBallston Spa, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 May 2007Case 31-CA-028280ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2007Case 31-CA-028258ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2007Case 02-CA-038233ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 March 2007Case 08-CA-037088ClosedAkron, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 March 2007Case 03-CA-026220ClosedBallston Spa, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2007Case 08-CA-037044ClosedAkron, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2007Case 30-CA-017679ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2006Case 16-CA-025251ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 500
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 2 October 2006Case 06-RD-001589ClosedButler, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 12
Included: All full-time and regular part-time service, maintenance and installation employees and bench technicians employed by the Employer at its Hermitage, Pennsylvania, facility; Excluding, all office and clerical employees, programming employees, sales personnel, chief technician, warehouse employees, and guards, professional employees and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2006Case 08-CA-036793ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 18
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 August 2006Case 16-CA-025155ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2005Case 31-CA-027400ClosedTorrance, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 200
TIME WARNER CABLE
CA
Filed 28 November 2001Case 09-CA-038912ClosedKettering, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 600
TIME WARNER CABLE
CA
Filed 23 November 2001Case 09-CA-038901ClosedKettering, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 350
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 17 November 2000Case 34-RD-000270ClosedMiddletown, NYRegion 01Workers in the unit 42
all full-time and regular part-time technicians, including all installers, service technicians, maintenance technicians, CLI technicians and lead technicians, and all dispatchers and warehouse employees; but excluding all other employees, deputy directors, office clerical employees, CSRs, and guards, professional employees and supervisors as defined in the Act.
TIME-WARNER CABLE
CA
Filed 1 November 2000Case 15-CA-015979ClosedWEST MONROE, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 May 2000Case 03-CA-022532ClosedIthaca, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 18
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 January 1999Case 03-CA-021716ClosedLiberty, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 15

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.