Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Tradesmen International, Inc.

35 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 35 are marked open by the Board · Region 03, 04, 05, 08, 14, 16, 18, 25 · Austin, TX; Butler, IN; Indianapolis, IN; Linthicum, MD; Macedonia, OH; Marshfield, WI and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	32
RC	Petition for an election	3

The cases

Petition for an election
RC
Filed 13 August 2014Case 03-RC-134652ClosedRochester, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 13
All full-time and regular part-time Sheet Metal, Fabricators, Installers and HVAC Service workers in the Rochester, New York office. Excluded: Guards, Supervisors provided by the Act.
TRADESMEN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CA
Filed 11 January 2013Case 04-CA-096151ClosedWest Chester, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 55
TRADESMEN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CA
Filed 9 January 2013Case 04-CA-096157ClosedWest Chester, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 January 2013Case 04-CA-096146ClosedWest Chester, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 55
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 18 March 2011Case 17-RC-012698ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 4
Included: Electricians working from the 140th Street Office Excluded: Any other craft, office staff
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 July 2009Case 17-CA-024582ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 November 2006Case 30-CA-017632ClosedMcFarland, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 October 2006Case 30-CA-017595ClosedMcFarland, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 September 2006Case 30-CA-017570ClosedMarshfield, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 11
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 August 2006Case 30-CA-017558ClosedNeenah, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 July 2006Case 30-CA-017531ClosedWaukesha, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 July 2006Case 30-CA-017529ClosedMcFarland, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 10
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 11 May 2006Case 08-RC-016820ClosedMacedonia, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 12
Included: All full time and regular part time employees employed by the employer, leased to M.W. Mielke Inc., preforming pipefitting, fire protection, hvac-r Services. Excluded: Excluding all office, clerical employees, professional employees, guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act, and all other employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2005Case 08-CA-035941ClosedValley View, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 February 2005Case 08-CA-035648ClosedValley View, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 February 2005Case 08-CA-035646ClosedValley View, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 December 2004Case 08-CA-035526ClosedValley View, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 December 2004Case 08-CA-035525ClosedValley View, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 December 2004Case 08-CA-035524ClosedValley View, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 September 2001Case 16-CA-021389ClosedAustin, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 September 1998Case 05-CA-027927ClosedLinthicum, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 1998Case 25-CA-025885ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 1998Case 25-CA-025815ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 7
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 December 1997Case 05-CA-027482ClosedLinthicum, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 1997Case 25-CA-025545ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 August 1997Case 25-CA-025531ClosedButler, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 May 1997Case 25-CA-025353ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 9
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 August 1996Case 05-CA-026466ClosedLinthicum, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 August 1996Case 05-CA-026465ClosedLinthicum, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 July 1996Case 05-CA-026412ClosedLinthicum, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 March 1996Case 25-CA-024520ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 March 1996Case 25-CA-024519ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 1995Case 25-CA-024126ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 August 1995Case 25-CA-024108ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 1995Case 25-CA-024030ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 200

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.